mit phd political science linkedin

• Core Members
• Affiliate Members
• Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program in Statistics
• Minor in Statistics and Data Science
• MicroMasters program in Statistics and Data Science
• Data Science and Machine Learning: Making Data-Driven Decisions
• Stochastics and Statistics Seminar
• IDSS Distinguished Seminars
• IDSS Special Seminar
• SDSC Special Events
• Online events
• IDS.190 Topics in Bayesian Modeling and Computation
• Past Events
• LIDS & Stats Tea
• Interdisciplinary PhD in Political Science and Statistics

Requirements: Students must complete their primary program’s degree requirements along with the IDPS requirements. Statistics requirements must not unreasonably impact performance or progress in a student’s primary degree program.

Grade Requirements:  B- in all required coursework (see options below)

PhD Earned on Completion: Political Science and Statistics

IDPS/Political Science Chair : Teppei Yamamoto

MIT Statistics + Data Science Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139-4307 617-253-1764

• Accessibility
• Interdisciplinary PhD in Aero/Astro and Statistics
• Interdisciplinary PhD in Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Statistics
• Interdisciplinary PhD in Economics and Statistics
• Interdisciplinary PhD in Mathematics and Statistics
• Interdisciplinary PhD in Mechanical Engineering and Statistics
• Interdisciplinary PhD in Physics and Statistics
• Interdisciplinary PhD in Social & Engineering Systems and Statistics
• LIDS & Stats Tea
• Spring 2023
• Spring 2022
• Spring 2021
• Fall – Spring 2020
• Fall 2019 – IDS.190 – Topics in Bayesian Modeling and Computation
• Fall 2019 – Spring 2019
• Fall 2018 and earlier

Mit Political Science Phd: Mastering the Art of Political Research

• political science

A PhD in Political Science from MIT is a prestigious and rigorous program. The degree offers in-depth study of political processes, theories, and public policy.

With a focus on research and academic scholarship, graduates are prepared for careers in academia, government, and research organizations. The program’s interdisciplinary approach and access to leading experts provide students with a highly competitive and influential academic experience. Furthermore, MIT’s strong emphasis on innovation and cutting-edge research ensures that graduates are well-equipped to address the contemporary and future challenges of political science.

Importance Of Political Research In Mit Political Science Phd

Political research plays a vital role in the pursuit of a PhD in Political Science at MIT. The importance of political research in this program cannot be overstated, as it forms the foundation for deepening our understanding of political systems, behaviors, and phenomena. Rigorous research is integral to advancing political theories, conducting empirical studies, and addressing real-world challenges faced by governments and societies.

Research As A Foundation For Political Science Studies

In MIT’s Political Science Ph.D. program, research serves as the cornerstone of academic inquiry and scholarly pursuits. It provides students with the tools and methodologies needed to critically analyze complex political issues, develop informed perspectives, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field. Through a combination of quantitative and qualitative research approaches, students gain valuable insights into various political phenomena and are equipped to undertake in-depth investigations into diverse political topics.

The Role Of Research In Advancing Political Theories

Research plays a pivotal role in advancing political theories by fostering a deeper understanding of the intricacies of political systems and dynamics. Through empirical research, students can test and refine existing theories, or form new ones, shaping the discourse in political science and pushing forward the boundaries of knowledge. The rigorous application of research methodologies allows for the exploration of diverse perspectives and the development of innovative theoretical frameworks that can be applied to contemporary political challenges.

Credit: computing.mit.edu

Research Methodologies In Political Science

The field of political science relies on various research methodologies to analyze and interpret political phenomena. These methodologies guide researchers in studying political behavior, institutions, and processes. In exploring political issues, researchers often employ quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches to gain a comprehensive understanding of complex political systems and dynamics.

Quantitative Research Methods In Political Science

Quantitative research methods in political science involve the collection and analysis of numerical data to investigate political phenomena. This method utilizes statistical techniques to measure and quantify political variables, such as public opinion, voting behavior, and policy preferences. Surveys, experiments, and content analysis are common tools used in quantitative research to examine patterns and relationships within political systems.

Qualitative Research Methods In Political Science

Qualitative research methods in political science focus on understanding the complexities of political phenomena through in-depth exploration and interpretation of non-numerical data. This approach often involves methodologies such as case studies, interviews, and ethnography to analyze political behaviors, ideologies, and decision-making processes. Qualitative research provides valuable insights into the nuances and contextual factors that influence political dynamics.

Mixed-method Approaches In Political Research

Mixed-method approaches in political research integrate both quantitative and qualitative techniques to provide a comprehensive understanding of political phenomena. By combining numerical data analysis with in-depth qualitative exploration, researchers can triangulate findings, validate results, and gain a more holistic perspective on complex political issues. This approach allows for a more robust analysis and interpretation of multifaceted political phenomena.

Data Collection And Analysis Techniques

When it comes to conducting robust and comprehensive political science research, data collection and analysis are of paramount importance. The techniques used for collecting and analyzing data play a critical role in shaping the outcomes and conclusions of political research studies. In this post, we will explore the various methods and approaches employed in data collection and analysis within the realm of political science research.

Utilizing Primary Sources For Political Science Research

The utilization of primary sources is integral to conducting rigorous and credible political science research. Primary sources, including original documents, eyewitness accounts, and archival materials, provide researchers with firsthand information that is essential for gaining deeper insights into political phenomena. By leveraging primary sources, researchers can validate the authenticity of their findings and establish a solid foundation for their research inquiries.

Analyzing Secondary Data For Political Research

Equally significant is the analysis of secondary data in political research. Secondary data, consisting of existing datasets, scholarly publications, and governmental reports, offers a wealth of information that can be harnessed to enrich and substantiate political science research. Analyzing secondary data allows researchers to identify trends, patterns, and correlations, enabling them to draw informed conclusions and formulate evidence-based arguments.

The Significance Of Data Visualization In Political Science Research

Data visualization holds immense value in the domain of political science research. Effectively visualizing data through charts, graphs, and infographics enhances the accessibility and interpretability of research findings. It empowers researchers to present complex data in a digestible format, facilitating seamless comprehension and communication of key insights to a broader audience.

Ethical Considerations In Political Research

In the field of political research, ethical considerations play a crucial role in ensuring the integrity and validity of the research findings. It is imperative for political science PhD candidates to understand and adhere to ethical guidelines to maintain the credibility of their research. This blog post will delve into the ethical considerations in political research, focusing on ensuring ethical conduct and addressing biases and conflicts of interest.

Ensuring Ethical Conduct In Political Research

Research Ethics Compliance: Political science PhD candidates must prioritize ethical conduct to maintain the trust and integrity of their research. They should strictly adhere to the ethical guidelines provided by their academic institutions and relevant regulatory bodies.

Informed Consent: When conducting research involving human subjects, obtaining informed consent is essential. Clear and transparent communication with participants regarding the purpose and potential impact of the research is crucial to ensure ethical conduct.

Addressing Biases And Conflicts Of Interest In Political Research

Identifying and Mitigating Biases: Political researchers should be vigilant in identifying and addressing any biases that may affect the objectivity of their findings. Utilizing diverse research methods and engaging in self-reflection can help mitigate biases.

Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest: It is essential for political science PhD candidates to disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may arise during the research process. Transparent disclosure helps maintain the credibility and transparency of the research.

Enhancing Political Research Skills For Mit Political Science Phd

As a student pursuing a Political Science PhD at MIT, it is crucial to develop and refine essential skills for conducting effective political research. This entails sharpening critical thinking abilities, honing analytical and writing skills, and leveraging technology for streamlined data management. Below, we’ll delve into the primary areas where MIT Political Science PhD program focuses on enhancing research skills.

Developing Critical Thinking For Political Research

Critical thinking is integral to the field of political science. The MIT Political Science PhD program emphasizes the cultivation of critical thinking skills to enable students to analyze and evaluate complex political phenomena, theories, and empirical evidence. By fostering a deeper understanding of political systems and ideologies, students can approach research questions with insight and construct well-reasoned arguments.

Fine-tuning Analytical And Writing Skills For Political Research

Effective analytical skills are vital for interpreting and synthesizing diverse sources of political information. MIT’s program provides opportunities for students to refine their analytical capabilities, enabling them to dissect intricate political issues and discern patterns within data. Moreover, the development of writing skills empowers scholars to effectively communicate their findings and analyses in a clear, persuasive manner, contributing to the advancement of political discourse.

Leveraging Technology For Efficient Political Research Data Management

Utilizing technology to manage and analyze vast quantities of political data is paramount in modern research. MIT Political Science PhD cultivates proficiency in leveraging technological tools and methodologies for data collection, organization, and analysis. By mastering data management techniques, students can streamline their research processes and derive deeper insights from political datasets, empowering them to contribute meaningfully to the academic and policy spheres.

Frequently Asked Questions On Mit Political Science Phd

What are the admission requirements for the mit political science phd program.

The admission requirements for the MIT Political Science PhD program typically include a strong academic background, letters of recommendation, GRE scores, a statement of purpose, and a writing sample. Additionally, relevant research or work experience may be beneficial.

What Specializations Are Offered Within The Mit Political Science Phd Program?

The MIT Political Science PhD program offers various specializations, including comparative politics, international relations, political theory, and public policy. Students have the opportunity to focus on their area of interest and conduct in-depth research in their chosen specialization.

How Long Does It Take To Complete The Mit Political Science Phd Program?

The duration to complete the MIT Political Science PhD program varies based on individual progress, research, and dissertation completion. On average, students can expect to spend around 5 to 6 years in the program. However, this timeframe may vary for each student based on their research and academic plan.

Earning a Political Science PhD can open numerous career opportunities in research, academia, and public service. With the right expertise and dedication, you can contribute to shaping political landscapes and public policies. Pursuing a PhD in Political Science is a valuable investment in your future and a powerful means to make a real impact.

Related Post

Values definition sociology: uncovering the core principles, how did the industrial revolution lead to imperialism: uncovering the link, how to attach leader to fly line: master the perfect connection, sociology is the study of understanding human society, leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Recent Post

What is the difference between a pastor and a minister: unveiling the distinct roles, who gets voted off big brother tonight unveiling the shocking elimination, why did huck shoot the president: unraveling the mystery, who voted against the cr: the shocking betrayal unveiled, how long is the hall of presidents discover the length of this iconic disney attraction, who was voted out of big brother: unveiling the eviction drama.

Our passion lies in making the complex and fascinating world of political science accessible to learners of all levels, fostering a deep understanding of political dynamics, governance, and global affairs.

© 2023 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED​ BY - PoliticalScienceGuru

By joining our mailing list, you’re not just subscribing to a newsletter; you’re becoming part of the PoliticalScienceGuru.com family.

Doctoral Degrees

A doctoral degree requires the satisfactory completion of an approved program of advanced study and original research of high quality..

Please note that the Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) and Doctor of Science (ScD) degrees are awarded interchangeably by all departments in the School of Engineering and the School of Science, except in the fields of biology, cognitive science, neuroscience, medical engineering, and medical physics. This means that, excepting the departments outlined above, the coursework and expectations to earn a Doctor of Philosophy and for a Doctor of Science degree from these schools are generally the same. Doctoral students may choose which degree they wish to complete.

Applicants interested in graduate education should apply to the department or graduate program conducting research in the area of interest. Some departments require a doctoral candidate to take a “minor” program outside of the student’s principal field of study; if you wish to apply to one of these departments, please consider additional fields you may like to pursue.

Below is a list of programs and departments that offer doctoral-level degrees.

This site uses cookies to give you the best possible experience. By browsing our website, you agree to our use of cookies.

If you require further information, please visit the Privacy Policy page.

"All in the Family? Political Socialization and the Legacies of State Violence"

Elizabeth Nugent, Princeton University

April 24, 2024 12:00PM Millikan Room, E53-482

Comparative Politics Speaker Series

PhD Program

Year after year, our top-ranked PhD program sets the standard for graduate economics training across the country. Graduate students work closely with our world-class faculty to develop their own research and prepare to make impactful contributions to the field.

Our doctoral program enrolls 20-24 full-time students each year and students complete their degree in five to six years. Students undertake core coursework in microeconomic theory, macroeconomics, and econometrics, and are expected to complete two major and two minor fields in economics. Beyond the classroom, doctoral students work in close collaboration with faculty to develop their research capabilities, gaining hands-on experience in both theoretical and empirical projects.

How to apply

Students are admitted to the program once per year for entry in the fall. The online application opens on September 15 and closes on December 15.

Meet our students

Our PhD graduates go on to teach in leading economics departments, business schools, and schools of public policy, or pursue influential careers with organizations and businesses around the world. 

Suggestions or feedback?

MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology

• Machine learning
• Social justice
• Black holes
• Classes and programs

Departments

• Aeronautics and Astronautics
• Brain and Cognitive Sciences
• Architecture
• Political Science
• Mechanical Engineering

Centers, Labs, & Programs

• Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL)
• Picower Institute for Learning and Memory
• Lincoln Laboratory
• School of Architecture + Planning
• School of Engineering
• School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences
• Sloan School of Management
• School of Science
• MIT Schwarzman College of Computing

A careful rethinking of the Iraq War

Press contact :, media download.

*Terms of Use:

Images for download on the MIT News office website are made available to non-commercial entities, press and the general public under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives license . You may not alter the images provided, other than to crop them to size. A credit line must be used when reproducing images; if one is not provided below, credit the images to "MIT."

Previous image Next image

The term “fog of war” expresses the chaos and uncertainty of the battlefield. Often, it is only in hindsight that people can grasp what was unfolding around them.

Now, additional clarity about the Iraq War has arrived in the form of a new book by MIT political scientist Roger Petersen, which dives into the war’s battlefield operations, political dynamics, and long-term impact. The U.S. launched the Iraq War in 2003 and formally wrapped it up in 2011, but Petersen analyzes the situation in Iraq through the current day and considers what the future holds for the country.

After a decade of research, Petersen identifies four key factors for understanding Iraq’s situation. First, the U.S. invasion created chaos and a lack of clarity in terms of the hierarchy among Shia, Sunni, and Kurdish groups. Second, given these conditions, organizations that comprised a mix of militias, political groups, and religious groups came to the fore and captured elements of the new state the U.S. was attempting to set up. Third, by about 2018, the Shia groups became dominant, establishing a hierarchy, and along with that dominance, sectarian violence has fallen. Finally, the hybrid organizations established many years ago are now highly integrated into the Iraqi state.

Petersen has also come to believe two things about the Iraq War are not fully appreciated. One is how widely U.S. strategy varied over time in response to shifting circumstances.

“This was not one war,” says Petersen. “This was many different wars going on. We had at least five strategies on the U.S. side.”

And while the expressed goal of many U.S. officials was to build a functioning democracy in Iraq, the intense factionalism of Iraqi society led to further military struggles, between and among religious and ethnic groups. Thus, U.S. military strategy shifted as this multisided conflict evolved.

“What really happened in Iraq, and the thing the United States and Westerners did not understand at first, is how much this would become a struggle for dominance among Shias, Sunnis, and Kurds,” says Petersen. “The United States thought they would build a state, and the state would push down and penetrate society. But it was society that created militias and captured the state.”

Attempts to construct a well-functioning state, in Iraq or elsewhere must confront this factor, Petersen adds. “Most people think in terms of groups. They think in terms of group hierarchies, and they’re motivated when they believe their own group is not in a proper space in the hierarchy. This is this emotion of resentment. I think this is just human nature.”

Petersen’s book, “ Death, Dominance, and State-Building: The U.S. in Iraq and the Future of American Military Intervention ,” is published today by Oxford University Press. Petersen is the Arthur and Ruth Sloan Professor of Political Science at MIT and a member of the Security Studies Program based at MIT’s Center for International Studies.

Research on the ground

Petersen spent years interviewing people who were on the ground in Iraq during the war, from U.S. military personnel to former insurgents to regular Iraqi citizens, while extensively analyzing data about the conflict.

“I didn’t really come to conclusions about Iraq until six or seven years of applying this method,” he says.

Ultimately, one core fact about the country heavily influenced the trajectory of the war. Iraq’s Sunni Muslims made up about 20 percent or less of the country’s population but had been politically dominant before the U.S. took military action. After the U.S. toppled former dictator Saddam Hussein, it created an opening for the Shia majority to grasp more power.

“The United States said, ‘We’re going to have democracy and think in individual terms,’ but this is not the way it played out,” Petersen says. “The way it played out was, over the years, the Shia organizations became the dominant force. The Sunnis and Kurds are now basically subordinate within this Shia-dominated state. The Shias also had advantages in organizing violence over the Sunnis, and they’re the majority. They were going to win.”

As Petersen details in the book, a central unit of power became the political militia, based on ethnic and religious identification. One Shia militia, the Badr Organization, had trained professionally for years in Iran. The local Iraqi leader Moqtada al-Sadr could recruit Shia fighters from among the 2 million people living in the Sadr City slum. And no political militia wanted to back a strong multiethnic government.

“They liked this weaker state,” Petersen says. “The United States wanted to build a new Iraqi state, but what we did was create a situation where multiple and large Shia militia make deals with each other.”

A captain’s war

In turn, these dynamics meant the U.S. had to shift military strategies numerous times, occasionally in high-profile ways. The five strategies Petersen identifies are clear, hold, build (CHB); decapitation; community mobilization; homogenization; and war-fighting.

“The war from the U.S. side was highly decentralized,” Petersen says. Military captains, who typically command about 140 to 150 soldiers, had fairly wide berth in terms of how they were choosing to fight.  

“It was a captain’s war in a lot of ways,” Petersen adds.

The point is emphatically driven home in one chapter, “Captain Wright goes to Baghdad,” co-authored with Col. Timothy Wright PhD ’18, who wrote his MIT political science dissertation based on his experience and company command during the surge period.

As Petersen also notes, drawing on government data, the U.S. also managed to suppress violence fairly effectively at times, particularly before 2006 and after 2008. “The professional soldiers tried to do a good job, but some of the problems they weren’t going to solve,” Petersen says.

Still, all of this raises a conundrum. If trying to start a new state in Iraq was always likely to lead to an increase in Shia power, is there really much the U.S. could have done differently?

“That’s a million-dollar question,” Petersen says.

Perhaps the best way to engage with it, Petersen notes, is to recognize the importance of studying how factional groups grasp power through use of violence, and how that emerges in society. It is a key issue running throughout Petersen’s work, and one, he notes, that has often been studied by his graduate students in MIT’s Security Studies Program.

“Death, Dominance, and State-Building” has received praise from foreign-policy scholars. Paul Staniland, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, has said the work combines “intellectual creativity with careful attention to on-the ground dynamics,” and is “a fascinating macro-level account of the politics of group competition in Iraq. This book is required reading for anyone interested in civil war, U.S. foreign policy, or the politics of violent state-building."

Petersen, for his part, allows that he was pleased when one marine who served in Iraq read the manuscript in advance and found it interesting.

“He said, ‘This is good, and it’s not the way we think about it,’” Petersen says. “That’s my biggest compliment, to have a practitioner say it make them think. If I can get that kind of reaction, I’ll be pleased.”

Share this news article on:

Related links.

• Roger Petersen
• Security Studies Program
• Center for International Studies
• Department of Political Science

Related Topics

• Books and authors
• Political science
• Middle East
• Security studies and military
• International relations
• School of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences

More MIT News

A biomedical engineer pivots from human movement to women’s health

Read full story →

MIT tops among single-campus universities in US patents granted

A new way to detect radiation involving cheap ceramics

A crossroads for computing at MIT

Growing our donated organ supply

New AI method captures uncertainty in medical images

• More news on MIT News homepage →

Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, USA

• Map (opens in new window)
• Events (opens in new window)
• People (opens in new window)
• Careers (opens in new window)
• Accessibility
• Social Media Hub
• MIT on Facebook
• MIT on YouTube
• MIT on Instagram