• ...is an important factor/concept/idea/ to consider because...
• … will be argued/outlined in this paper.
Once you have finished writing your first draft it is recommended that you spend time revising your work. Proofreading and editing are two different stages of the revision process.
As can be seen in the figure above there are four main areas that you should review during the editing phase of the revision process. The main things to consider when editing include content, structure, style, and sources. It is important to check that all the content relates to the assignment task, the structure is appropriate for the purposes of the assignment, the writing is academic in style, and that sources have been adequately acknowledged. Use the checklist below when editing your work.
Editing checklist
There are also several key things to look out for during the proofreading phase of the revision process. In this stage it is important to check your work for word choice, grammar and spelling, punctuation and referencing errors. It can be easy to mis-type words like ‘from’ and ‘form’ or mix up words like ‘trail’ and ‘trial’ when writing about research, apply American rather than Australian spelling, include unnecessary commas or incorrectly format your references list. The checklist below is a useful guide that you can use when proofreading your work.
Proofreading checklist
This chapter has examined the experience of writing assignments. It began by focusing on how to read and break down an assignment question, then highlighted the key components of essays. Next, it examined some techniques for paraphrasing and summarising, and how to build an argument. It concluded with a discussion on planning and structuring your assignment and giving it that essential polish with editing and proof-reading. Combining these skills and practising them, can greatly improve your success with this very common form of assessment.
Academic Skills Centre. (2013). Writing an introduction and conclusion . University of Canberra, accessed 13 August, 2013, http://www.canberra.edu.au/studyskills/writing/conclusions
Balkis, M., & Duru, E. (2016). Procrastination, self-regulation failure, academic life satisfaction, and affective well-being: underregulation or misregulation form. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31 (3), 439-459.
Custer, N. (2018). Test anxiety and academic procrastination among prelicensure nursing students. Nursing education perspectives, 39 (3), 162-163.
Yerdelen, S., McCaffrey, A., & Klassen, R. M. (2016). Longitudinal examination of procrastination and anxiety, and their relation to self-efficacy for self-regulated learning: Latent growth curve modeling. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16 (1).
Writing Assignments Copyright © 2021 by Kate Derrington; Cristy Bartlett; and Sarah Irvine is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.
Before you can answer a question, you need to know what it means. When you are trying to understand the question look for instructional words, words that tell you what to do. Examples of these are analyse, describe and review.
This table provides a list of instructional words and explains clearly what they require you to do in your essay, assignment or exam.
Break down a topic into parts. Look in depth at each part using supporting arguments and evidence for and against. | |
Present reasons and evidence to support or reject a position or viewpoint. | |
Decide how important, useful, valuable or effective something is and give your reasons and evidence. | |
Arrange information into groups. | |
Present your opinion on the topic and back up your opinion with relevant evidence/information. | |
Identify similarities between two or more topics/ideas. | |
Identify differences between two or more topics/ideas. | |
Identify and discuss both the similarities and differences between ideas/topics etc. | |
Give your judgement about the value or truth of something. Discuss both positive and negative points. Support with evidence. | |
Clearly state the exact meaning of something. | |
Use examples or evidence to clarify and support your answer. | |
Give a detailed account of something. No explanation or interpretation is required. | |
Make a graph, chart or drawing to illustrate an idea. Label it and include a brief explanation. | |
Present both sides of an issue/subject with evidence and then draw conclusions. | |
Provide more detail with reasons and examples. | |
Investigate closely a topic/issue etc. | |
Make something clear by providing reasons and evidence. | |
Select relevant details and discuss these. | |
Examine a statement or idea and give a clear explanation/judgement of what it means. | |
Use evidence to support an argument or idea. The aim is to convince the reader. | |
Give a concise numbered list of things or ideas. | |
Give the main points, do not include detail. | |
Establish the truth of something using evidence. | |
Show how things are connected or related to each other. | |
Briefly and clearly present the main points. | |
Give a concise account of the key points of the topic removing unnecessary detail. | |
Describe the development or history of a topic from some point of origin. |
4-minute read
Writing a thesis or dissertation is hard work. You’ve devoted countless hours to your research, and you want your results to be taken seriously. But how does your professor or evaluating committee know that they can trust your results? You convince them by justifying your research methods.
In simple terms, your methods are the tools you use to obtain your data, and the justification (which is also called the methodology ) is the analysis of those tools. In your justification, your goal is to demonstrate that your research is both rigorously conducted and replicable so your audience recognizes that your results are legitimate.
The formatting and structure of your justification will depend on your field of study and your institution’s requirements, but below, we’ve provided questions to ask yourself as you outline your justification.
Does your study rely on quantitative data, qualitative data, or both? Certain types of data work better for certain studies. How did you choose to gather that data? Evaluate your approach to collecting data in light of your research question. Did you consider any alternative approaches? If so, why did you decide not to use them? Highlight the pros and cons of various possible methods if necessary. Research results aren’t valid unless the data are valid, so you have to convince your reader that they are.
Collecting your data was only the first part of your study. Once you had them, how did you use them? Do your results involve cross-referencing? If so, how was this accomplished? Which statistical analyses did you run, and why did you choose them? Are they common in your field? How did you make sure your data were statistically significant ? Is your effect size small, medium, or large? Numbers don’t always lend themselves to an obvious outcome. Here, you want to provide a clear link between the Methods and Results sections of your paper.
Most fields have standard approaches to the research they use, but these approaches don’t work for every project. Did you use methods that other fields normally use, or did you need to come up with a different way of obtaining your data? Your reader will look at unconventional approaches with a more critical eye. Acknowledge the limitations of your method, but explain why the strengths of the method outweigh those limitations.
Subscribe to our newsletter and get writing tips from our editors straight to your inbox.
You can strengthen your justification by referencing existing research in your field. Citing these references can demonstrate that you’ve followed established practices for your type of research. Or you can discuss how you decided on your approach by evaluating other studies. Highlight the use of established techniques, tools, and measurements in your study. If you used an unconventional approach, justify it by providing evidence of a gap in the existing literature.
● When you’re writing your justification, write for your audience. Your purpose here is to provide more than a technical list of details and procedures. This section should focus more on the why and less on the how .
● Consider your methodology as you’re conducting your research. Take thorough notes as you work to make sure you capture all the necessary details correctly. Eliminating any possible confusion or ambiguity will go a long way toward helping your justification.
Your goal in writing your justification is to explain not only the decisions you made but also the reasoning behind those decisions. It should be overwhelmingly clear to your audience that your study used the best possible methods to answer your research question. Properly justifying your methods will let your audience know that your research was effective and its results are valid.
Want more writing tips? Check out Proofed’s Writing Tips and Academic Writing Tips blogs. And once you’ve written your thesis or dissertation, consider sending it to us. Our editors will be happy to check your grammar, spelling, and punctuation to make sure your document is the best it can be. Check out our services for free .
Post A New Comment
9-minute read
Is your content getting noticed? Capturing and maintaining an audience’s attention is a challenge when...
8-minute read
Are you looking to enhance engagement and captivate your audience through your professional documents? Interactive...
7-minute read
Voice search optimization is rapidly shaping the digital landscape, requiring content professionals to adapt their...
Are you a creative freelancer looking to make a lasting impression on potential clients or...
Effective professional communication is an important skill for contractors and freelancers navigating remote work environments....
3-minute read
Google Docs is a powerful collaborative tool, and mastering its features can significantly enhance your...
Search suggestions update instantly to match the search query.
Explore what different task words mean and how they apply to your assignments
Task words are the words or phrases in a brief that tell you what to do. Common examples of task words are 'discuss', 'evaluate', 'compare and contrast', and 'critically analyse'. These words are used in assessment marking criteria and will showcase how well you've answered the question.
None of these words have a fixed meaning. Your lecturers may have specific definitions for your subject or task so you should make sure you have a good idea of what these terms mean in your field. You can check this by speaking to your lecturer, checking your course handbook and reading your marking criteria carefully.
Download this page as a PDF for your essay writing revision notes.
Explore our top tips for writing clear sentences and download our help sheet.
Assignments usually ask you to demonstrate that you have immersed yourself in the course material and that you've done some thinking on your own; questions not treated at length in class often serve as assignments. Fortunately, if you've put the time into getting to know the material, then you've almost certainly begun thinking independently. In responding to assignments, keep in mind the following advice.
Understanding some key words commonly used in assignments also may simplify your task. Toward this end, let's take a look at two seemingly impenetrable instructions: "discuss" and "analyze."
1. Discuss the role of gender in bringing about the French Revolution.
A weak discussion essay in response to the question above might simply list a few aspects of the Revolution—the image of Liberty, the executions of the King and Marie Antoinette, the cry "Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite!" —and make separate comments about how each, being "gendered," is therefore a powerful political force. Such an essay would offer no original thesis, but instead restate the question asked in the assignment (i.e., "The role of gender was very important in the French Revolution" or "Gender did not play a large role in the French Revolution").
In a strong discussion essay, the thesis would go beyond a basic restatement of the assignment question. You might test the similarities and differences of the revolutionary aspects being discussed. You might draw on fresh or unexpected evidence, perhaps using as a source an intriguing reading that was only briefly touched upon in lecture.
2. Analyze two of Chaucer's Canterbury Tales, including one not discussed in class, as literary works and in terms of sources/analogues.
The words "analyze" and "analysis" may seem to denote highly advanced, even arcane skills, possessed in virtual monopoly by mathematicians and scientists. Happily, the terms refer to mental activity we all perform regularly; the terms just need decoding. "Analyze" means two things in this specific assignment prompt.
Second, you need to consider the two tales critically to arrive at some reward for having observed how the tales are made and where they came from (their sources/analogues). In the course of your essay, you might work your way to investigating Chaucer's broader attitude toward his sources, which alternates between playful variation and strict adherence. Your complex analysis of kinds of humor might reveal differing conceptions of masculine and feminine between Chaucer and his literary sources, or some other important cultural distinction.
Analysis involves both a set of observations about the composition or workings of your subject and a critical approach that keeps you from noticing just anything—from excessive listing or summarizing—and instead leads you to construct an interpretation, using textual evidence to support your ideas.
Some Final Advice
If, having read the assignment carefully, you're still confused by it, don't hesitate to ask for clarification from your instructor. He or she may be able to elucidate the question or to furnish some sample responses to the assignment. Knowing the expectations of an assignment can help when you're feeling puzzled. Conversely, knowing the boundaries can head off trouble if you're contemplating an unorthodox approach. In either case, before you go to your instructor, it's a good idea to list, underline or circle the specific places in the assignment where the language makes you feel uncertain.
William C. Rice, for the Writing Center at Harvard University
Home » Microsoft Word » How to justify text in MS Word
To simply put, a justified text is spaced so that the sides of your paragraphs are aligned to both the left and right margins.
MS Word automatically fills in spaces between words to achieve clean-cut edges rendering paragraph lines to be of the same length.
Lets get started.
Step 1: open an ms word document. .
Select the text that you want to be justified. Then, go to the Home tab and select the Justify icon found under the Paragraph group.
This will justify the selected text.
Select the text you want to justify.
Now, hit the CTRL + J keys on your keyboard to justify the selected text.
There you have it! You’ve just used a shortcut key to justify text in Word!
Step 1: open a word document. .
Now that you have your document ready, go ahead and select the text that you want to be justified.
This will display the Paragraph dialogue box right in the middle of your screen.
On the dialogue box, under Indents and Spacing , click the Alignment drop-down menu and select Justified .
Click the OK button to save or Cancel to revert changes.
Voila! You’ve just used the context menu to justify text in Word.
We hope you’ve found this article helpful!
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Adjusting justification in Word is a quick and simple process. It involves selecting the text you want to justify, clicking on the ‘Home’ tab, and then choosing your desired justification option from the ‘Paragraph’ group. Once you click on your chosen justification style, your text will instantly adjust.
After you complete the action, the text will align based on the justification you selected. If you chose left justification, it will align to the left, and if you chose right, it will align to the right. Center justification will center your text, and full justification will spread it out to align both left and right.
When it comes to creating professional-looking documents, the justification of your text is a crucial element that often goes overlooked. Justification refers to the alignment of text within a document. It can affect the overall appearance and readability of your work. Whether you’re typing up an essay, a report, or a resume, knowing how to adjust the justification of your text in Microsoft Word is essential.
Not only does proper justification make your document look neater, but it also impacts how easily your readers can follow along. After all, we’ve all struggled to read a poorly formatted document at some point, right? This article is relevant to students, professionals, writers, and anyone in between who seeks to enhance their Word documents. Let’s dive into the step-by-step process of adjusting justification in Word.
Before we get into the steps, let’s discuss what adjusting justification will accomplish. By following these steps, you’ll be able to change how your text lines up on the page. This is useful for meeting specific formatting guidelines, enhancing the flow of your document, or simply making it look more aesthetically pleasing.
Once you’ve highlighted the text, you’re ready to start adjusting the justification. Make sure you only select the text you want to change, as the justification will apply to whatever is highlighted.
Find and click on the ‘Home’ tab in the Word ribbon.
The ‘Home’ tab is where you’ll find most of the basic formatting options, including font type, size, and, of course, paragraph justification. It’s usually located at the top of your Word document.
In the ‘Paragraph’ group, click on your desired justification style.
You’ll see four different options for justification: align text left, center, align text right, and justify. The icons are pretty self-explanatory, but feel free to hover over them with your cursor to see a tooltip with each one’s function.
Benefit | Explanation |
---|---|
Improved Readability | Adjusting justification can greatly improve the readability of your document. Proper alignment can make your text more organized and easy to follow, which is especially important for longer documents. |
Professional Appearance | A well-justified document looks neat and professional. It gives the impression that you’ve put thought and care into the presentation of your work, which can be crucial in professional or academic settings. |
Meets Formatting Requirements | Many documents, such as academic papers or business reports, have specific formatting guidelines that include text justification. Knowing how to adjust this in Word helps you meet those requirements with ease. |
Drawback | Explanation |
---|---|
Uneven Spacing | Full justification, while making both sides of the text align, can sometimes create awkward spaces between words. This can disrupt the flow of reading if not adjusted properly. |
Inconsistent Appearance | If used incorrectly, adjusting justification can make different sections of your document look inconsistent. It’s important to apply justification styles thoughtfully to maintain a cohesive look. |
Overlooked Detail | Some may find adjusting justification to be an unnecessary detail that doesn’t impact the overall content. However, overlooking this aspect can detract from the professionalism of your document. |
Adjusting the justification in Word is more than just choosing how your text aligns. It’s about presenting your information in the clearest, most accessible way possible. Remember, the goal is to make your document as reader-friendly as possible.
For instance, if you’re working on a resume, you may want to use left justification for the main body to keep it clean and uniform. But maybe you decide to center-justify your name and contact information at the top to make it stand out. It’s these small details that can make a big difference.
Also, consider the type of document you’re creating. Novels and books usually use full justification because it creates a clean look that’s easy on the eyes for long reading sessions. On the other hand, business emails or letters often use left justification because it’s straightforward and conventional.
Lastly, don’t be afraid to mix and match different justifications in the same document. As long as it’s done tastefully, it can add visual interest and help guide the reader’s eye to the most important information.
What is text justification.
Text justification refers to the alignment of text within a document. It can be aligned to the left, center, right, or justified, which aligns it evenly on both the left and right sides.
Justifying a single word wouldn’t make much sense, as justification affects how a line or paragraph of text aligns. If you’re looking to emphasize a single word, consider other formatting options like bold or italics.
Yes, how you justify your text can affect the overall formatting and appearance of your document. It’s an important aspect of document design.
Absolutely. If you change your mind after justifying text, simply click ‘Undo’ or press ‘Ctrl + Z’ on your keyboard to revert the changes.
Full justification aims to align both sides of the text to the margins, which can sometimes result in irregular spacing to fill the line fully. This can be adjusted manually if needed.
Adjusting justification in Word might seem like a small detail, but it’s one that can have a significant impact on the look and readability of your document. Whether you’re aligning to the left for a formal letter, centering for an invitation, or using full justification for a report, the power is in your hands to enhance your document’s presentation.
Remember, while content is king, presentation is queen. A well-justified document can speak volumes about your attention to detail and care for your audience. So next time you open up Word to start typing, take a moment to adjust your justification—it could make all the difference.
Matthew Burleigh has been writing tech tutorials since 2008. His writing has appeared on dozens of different websites and been read over 50 million times.
After receiving his Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Computer Science he spent several years working in IT management for small businesses. However, he now works full time writing content online and creating websites.
His main writing topics include iPhones, Microsoft Office, Google Apps, Android, and Photoshop, but he has also written about many other tech topics as well.
Read his full bio here.
Join our free newsletter.
Featured guides and deals
You may opt out at any time. Read our Privacy Policy
Task works for science based essays.
It is really important to understand the directive or task word used in your assignment.
This will indicate how you should write and what the purpose of the assignment in. The following examples show some task words and their definitions.
However, it is important to note that none of these words has a fixed meaning. The definitions given are a general guide, and interpretation of the words may vary according to the context and the discipline.
If you are unsure as the exactly what a lecturer means by a particular task word, you should ask for clarification.
Analyse : Break up into parts; investigate
Comment on : Identify and write about the main issues; give your reactions based on what you've read/ heard in lectures. Avoid just personal opinion.
Compare : Look for the similarities between two things. Show the relevance or consequences of these similarities concluding which is preferable.
Contrast : Identify the differences between two items or arguments. Show whether the differences are significant. Perhaps give reasons why one is preferable.
Criticise : Requires an answer that points out mistakes or weaknesses, and which also indicates any favourable aspects of the subject of the question. It requires a balanced answer.
Critically evaluate : Weigh arguments for and against something, assessing the strength of the evidence on both sides. Use criteria to guide your assessment of which opinions, theories, models or items are preferable.
Define : Give the exact meaning of. Where relevant, show you understand how the definition may be problematic.
Describe : To describe is to give an observational account of something and would deal with what happened, where it happened, when it happened and who was involved. Spell out the main aspects of an idea or topic or the sequence in which a series of things happened.
Discuss : Investigate or examine by argument; sift and debate; give reasons for and against; examine the implications.
Evaluate : Assess and give your judgement about the merit, importance or usefulness of something using evidence to support your argument.
Examine : Look closely into something
Explain : Offer a detailed and exact rationale behind an idea or principle, or a set of reasons for a situation or attitude. Make clear how and why something happens.
Explore : Examine thoroughly; consider from a variety of viewpoints
Illustrate : Make something clear and explicit, give examples of evidence
Justify : Give evidence that supports and argument or idea; show why a decision or conclusions were made
Outline : Give the main points/features/general principles; show the main structure and interrelations; omit details and examples
State : Give the main features briefly and clearly
Summarise : Draw out the main points only; omit details and examples
To what extent... : Consider how far something is true, or contributes to a final outcome. Consider also ways in which it is not true.
How to write e.g., discuss, argue etc.
What you should be writing about.
May narrow or change the focus of your answer. (Important - they stop you from including irrelevant info)
Below are some examples of questions and tips on how you might think about answering them.
Compare - Make sure you are comparing and not just describing the two things in isolation
Acute and chronic pain - Subject matter
In terms of pathophysiology and treatment - Important limiting phrase - focus ONLY on these things. Use them as a lens to highlight the differences between acute and chronic pain.
Tip : Assignments that ask you to compare two things can be structured in different ways. You may choose to alternate continually between the two things, making direct comparisons and organising your essay according to themes. Alternatively, you may choose to discuss one thing fully and then the next. If you choose the second approach, you must make the links and comparisons between the two things completely clear.
With reference to any particular example enzyme - Important limiting phase - focus your answer on a specific example. Use this example to help demonstrate your understanding.
Outline - Factual description is needed. You must demonstrate your knowledge and understanding.
The key structural and functional properties of its active site - Subject matter
Tip : Assignments that ask you to outline or describe are assessing your understanding of the topic. You must express facts clearly and precisely, using examples to illuminate them.
There is - Task words not so obvious this time. Try turning the title into a question: 'Is there any convincing evidence for...?'
Convincing - Important limiting word- there may be evidence but you need to assess whether or not it is convincing.
For the existence of life outside of our solar system - Subject matter
Tip : Assignment titles that are on actually a question are often simply asking 'how true is this statement?' You must present reasons it could be true and reasons it might not be, supported by evidence and recognising the complexity of the statement.
Discuss - Explore the topic from different angles, in a critical way (not purely descriptive)
Nuclear power - Subject matter
Provide a solution to - Limiting phrase: discuss ways it can and ways it can't- don't be afraid to take a position based on evidence.
Environmental issues - Subject matter. Might be an idea to define/ discuss what could be meant by environmental issues? This might be important for your argument.
Tip : If an assignment is asking a direct question, make sure your essay answers it. Address it directly in the introduction, make sure each paragraph contributes something towards your response to it, and reinforce your response in your conclusion.
The issue of patient autonomy - Subject matter
In relation to at least one case study - Important limiting phrase - don't just discuss the issue of patient autonomy in general; discuss it in the context of one or more case studies. You should use the case study to illustrate all of your points about patient autonomy.
Tip : Assignments that ask you to discuss in relation to a case study, or to a placement or own experience, usually want to see a clear link between theory and practice (reality).
transitive verb
intransitive verb
maintain , assert , defend , vindicate , justify mean to uphold as true, right, just, or reasonable.
maintain stresses firmness of conviction.
assert suggests determination to make others accept one's claim.
defend implies maintaining in the face of attack or criticism.
vindicate implies successfully defending.
justify implies showing to be true, just, or valid by appeal to a standard or to precedent.
These examples are programmatically compiled from various online sources to illustrate current usage of the word 'justify.' Any opinions expressed in the examples do not represent those of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us feedback about these examples.
Middle English justifien , from Anglo-French or Late Latin; Anglo-French justifier , from Late Latin justificare , from Latin justus — see just entry 1
14th century, in the meaning defined at transitive sense 1a
justifying space
“Justify.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary , Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/justify. Accessed 30 Jun. 2024.
Kids definition of justify, legal definition, legal definition of justify, more from merriam-webster on justify.
Nglish: Translation of justify for Spanish Speakers
Britannica English: Translation of justify for Arabic Speakers
Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!
Word of the day.
See Definitions and Examples »
Get Word of the Day daily email!
Plural and possessive names: a guide, your vs. you're: how to use them correctly, every letter is silent, sometimes: a-z list of examples, more commonly mispronounced words, how to use em dashes (—), en dashes (–) , and hyphens (-), popular in wordplay, it's a scorcher words for the summer heat, flower etymologies for your spring garden, 12 star wars words, 'swash', 'praya', and 12 more beachy words, 8 words for lesser-known musical instruments, games & quizzes.
Glossary of Grammatical and Rhetorical Terms
SEAN GLADWELL / Getty Images
In typesetting and printing, the process or result of spacing text so that the lines come out even at the margins .
The lines of text on this page are left-justified— that is, the text is lined up evenly on the left side of the page but not on the right (which is called ragged right ). As a general rule, use left justification when preparing essays, reports, and research papers.
Pronunciation: jus-te-feh-KAY-shen
" Research papers follow a standard presentation format...Do not right- justify (align) your paper. The right margins should be ragged. Your computer will automatically justify your left margin." (Laurie Rozakis, Schaum's Quick Guide to Writing Great Research Papers . McGraw-Hill, 2007)
"To avoid the appearance of inconsistent spacing between words and sentences, all text in a manuscript should be presented flush left (ragged right)--that is, lines should not be 'justified' to the right margin. To leave enough room for handwritten queries, margins of at least one inch should appear on all four sides of the hard copy." ( The Chicago Manual of Style , 16th ed. The University of Chicago Press, 2010)
"Left- justified margins are generally easier to read than full-justified margins that can produce irregular spaces between words and unwanted blocks of text. However, because left-justified (ragged-right) margins look informal, full-justified text is more appropriate for publications aimed at a broad readership that expects a more formal, polished appearance. Further, full justification is often useful with multiple-column formats because the spaces between the columns (called alleys ) need the definition that full justification provides." (Gerald J. Alred, Charles T. Brusaw, and Walter E. Oliu, The Business Writer's Handbook , 7th ed. Macmillan, 2003)
"Do not set full justification on an ASCII resume . Instead, left justify all lines so the right margin is ragged." (Pat Criscito, How to Write Better Résumés and Cover Letters . Barron's Educational Series, 2008)
Justify , justified , justification , or full justified is text that is both left-aligned and right-aligned. For example, this paragraph of text is justified. As you can see, there is no ragged edge on either the left or right side of the text. To make both sides of the text straight extra spacing is added between each of the words.
The last line of the paragraph is always left-aligned, as seen above.
The term "justify" is not a synonym for "align" or "alignment." These terms have different meanings. See the alignment definition for its meaning.
In Microsoft Word , use the Ctrl + J keyboard shortcut to justify any text. In Google Docs , use the Ctrl + Shift + J keyboard shortcut.
Center , Left align , Margin , Right align , Typography terms , Word processor terms , Word wrap
Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Q&A for work
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
When being asked to justify some conclusion, is it same as to prove it?
My memory tells me that "justify" has been used to describe some informal verification, not necessarily formal proof. I wonder if it is true? If yes, in what sense is "justify" informal? For example, only need to prove necessarity not sufficiency?
Thanks and regards!
A computation, properly laid out, is of course a proof. However, many students, after years of multiple choice tests, have learned to take the point of view that the answer is the only thing that matters.
"Justify" can be a reminder that the problem will be graded carefully, that (contrary to their usual experience) a slapdash computation will not necessarily get full marks.
I do not think that "justify" carries any connotation of "you need only show necessity but not sufficiency."
"Prove," in a course context, can often mean that a more or less specific set of tools should be used. "Justify" has a more informal feel, but I do not think of it as carrying a lower level of precision.
To me, "justify" means to lay out the mathematical thought process step by step, so that the line from the starting point to the ending point is connected.
It is a bit less formal than a proof, which has certain logical requirements, but it means, "show enough work so that I know that you get the whole thing."
"Justify," just like its buddy "show," really means "prove."
I also encounter "justify", other than as a synonym for "prove", in meta-mathematical discussion. Sometimes (a lot of the time) the author of a book will invent a notation for a particular object being studied. In this case he/she might "justify" the invented notation, which usually means giving a reason why it's not arbitrary.
For example, while the sum of real valued functions is a different operation than the sum of real numbers, the same symbol "+" is used. I don't think this is the best example, but there's a plethora of them if one looks.
I guess justify means don't assume away.
Some possible exam questions:
1 Prove Borel-Cantelli Lemma.
2 Show that the series given below satisfies the differential equation. Justify all your steps.
3 Show that the series given below satisfies the differential equation. You do not have to justify switching derivative and summation.
In case 2, the professor is saying one cannot assume certain steps are valid as was done in previous classes. In this class, we proved things we assumed away in previous classes. You are to prove them here as well.
In case 3, the professor is saying one can assume said steps are valid.
Not the answer you're looking for browse other questions tagged terminology ..
Definition of justify verb from the Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary
present simple I / you / we / they justify | /ˈdʒʌstɪfaɪ/ /ˈdʒʌstɪfaɪ/ |
he / she / it justifies | /ˈdʒʌstɪfaɪz/ /ˈdʒʌstɪfaɪz/ |
past simple justified | /ˈdʒʌstɪfaɪd/ /ˈdʒʌstɪfaɪd/ |
past participle justified | /ˈdʒʌstɪfaɪd/ /ˈdʒʌstɪfaɪd/ |
-ing form justifying | /ˈdʒʌstɪfaɪɪŋ/ /ˈdʒʌstɪfaɪɪŋ/ |
Join our community to access the latest language learning and assessment tips from Oxford University Press!
Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio
Translations of justify.
Get a quick, free translation!
Word of the Day
sink or swim
If you are left to sink or swim, you are given no help so that you succeed or fail completely by your own efforts.
Fakes and forgeries (Things that are not what they seem to be)
To add justify to a word list please sign up or log in.
Add justify to one of your lists below, or create a new one.
{{message}}
Something went wrong.
There was a problem sending your report.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Definition of Question Words with Examples. Words such as 'explain', 'evaluate' or 'analyse' - typical question words used in essay titles - provide a useful indication of how your essay should be structured. They often require varying degrees of critical responses. Sometimes, they may simply require a descriptive answer.
Here's a list of some of the most common instruction/command words you'll see in essay questions (and examination questions as well), together with an explanation of what they mean. Describe: Give a detailed account of…. Outline: Give the main features/general principles; don't include minor details. Explain, account for, interpret: Describe ...
Step Four: Compose the Main Body. The main body of your justification essay should contain all essential ideas and quality arguments that support your opinion about the subject. Remember that you have to justify why you think in the definite way. Teachers often assign controversial topics in order to make students take the definite side in this ...
What is a rationale? A rationale is when you are asked to give the reasoning or justification for an action or a choice you make. There is a focus on the 'why' in a rationale: why you chose to do something, study or focus on something. It is a set of statements of purpose and significance and often addresses a gap or a need.
What this handout is about. The first step in any successful college writing venture is reading the assignment. While this sounds like a simple task, it can be a tough one. This handout will help you unravel your assignment and begin to craft an effective response. Much of the following advice will involve translating typical assignment terms ...
Justify: Give evidence which supports an argument or idea; show why a decision or conclusions were made. Justify may be used with other topic words, such as outline, argue. Write a report outlining the key issues and implications of a welfare cashless debit card trial and make three recommendations for future improvements.
Examine a statement or idea and give a clear explanation/judgement of what it means. Justify: Use evidence to support an argument or idea. The aim is to convince the reader. List: Give a concise numbered list of things or ideas. Outline: Give the main points, do not include detail. Prove: Establish the truth of something using evidence. Relate
Two Final Tips: When you're writing your justification, write for your audience. Your purpose here is to provide more than a technical list of details and procedures. This section should focus more on the why and less on the how. Consider your methodology as you're conducting your research.
Account for: Similar to 'explain' but with a heavier focus on reasons why something is or is not the way it is.; Analyse: This term has the widest range of meanings according to the subject.Make a justified selection of some of the essential features of an artefact, idea or issue. Examine how these relate to each other and to other ideas, in order to help better understand the topic.
In the context of an assignment, however, discussion entails fulfilling a defined and organized task: to construct an argument that considers and responds to an ample range of materials. To "discuss," in assignment language, means to make a broad argument about a set of arguments you have studied. In the case above, you can do this by
Method 1: Using the Justify Text-alignment Button. Step 1: Open an MS Word document. Step 2: Select the text. Select the text that you want to be justified. Then, go to the Home tab and select the Justify icon found under the Paragraph group. This will justify the selected text.
Step 2: Click on the 'Home' Tab. Find and click on the 'Home' tab in the Word ribbon. The 'Home' tab is where you'll find most of the basic formatting options, including font type, size, and, of course, paragraph justification. It's usually located at the top of your Word document.
Justify: Give evidence that supports and argument or idea; show why a decision or conclusions were made. Outline: Give the main points/features/general principles; show the main structure and interrelations; omit details and examples. State: Give the main features briefly and clearly. Summarise: Draw out the main points only; omit details and ...
the statement. Conclude by listing the most important factors and justify why you agree/disagree. Define Clearly state the meaning, and list the qualities, traits and characteristics. Describe Provide a detailed explanation about how and why something happens. Discuss Make a case for or against an argument and reach a conclusion. Point out the
2 justify something/yourself (to somebody) justify (somebody/something) doing something to give an explanation or excuse for something or for doing something synonym defend The Secretary of Education has been asked to justify the decision to Congress. You don't need to justify yourself to me.
justify: [verb] to prove or show to be just, right, or reasonable. to show to have had a sufficient legal reason. to qualify (oneself) as a surety (see surety 3) by taking oath to the ownership of sufficient property.
In typesetting and printing, the process or result of spacing text so that the lines come out even at the margins . The lines of text on this page are left-justified— that is, the text is lined up evenly on the left side of the page but not on the right (which is called ragged right ). As a general rule, use left justification when preparing ...
Justify, justified, justification, or full justified is text that is both left-aligned and right-aligned. For example, this paragraph of text is justified. As you can see, there is no ragged edge on either the left or right side of the text. To make both sides of the text straight extra spacing is added between each of the words. The last line ...
JUSTIFY meaning: 1. to give or to be a good reason for: 2. If you justify yourself, you give a good reason for what…. Learn more.
To me, "justify" means to lay out the mathematical thought process step by step, so that the line from the starting point to the ending point is connected. It is a bit less formal than a proof, which has certain logical requirements, but it means, "show enough work so that I know that you get the whole thing." Share. Cite.
justify something/yourself The senator made an attempt to justify his actions. justify something/yourself to somebody The Prime Minister has been asked to justify the decision to Parliament. You don't need to justify yourself to me. justify doing something He sought to justify taking these measures by citing the threat of a terrorist attack.
JUSTIFY definition: 1. to give or to be a good reason for: 2. If you justify yourself, you give a good reason for what…. Learn more.
Analyse them.Key instruction words in as. tasksAnalyseWhen you analyse something you consider it carefully and in detail in order to understand. r explain it. To analyse, identify the main parts or ideas of a subject and examine or interpret the connections. m.Comment onWhen you comment on a subject or the ideas in a subject, you say something ...
does not provide an application form, any individual who otherwise indicates a specific desire to an employer or other covered entity to be considered for employment. Except for recordkeeping purposes, "Applicant" is also an individual who can prove that he or she hasthey have been deterred from applying for a job by an employer's or
rejection, or assignment of any executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor not previously rejected under such section; "(3) provide for— "(A) the settlement or adjustment of any claim or interest belonging to the debtor or to the estate; or "(B) the retention and enforcement by the debtor, by the trustee, or
but does not include work of a kind that is excluded from this definition by the regulations. classof accreditation means a class of accreditation prescribed under section 54 (5). classof registration means a class of registration prescribed under section 6 (4). close associatehas the same meaning as it has in theHome Building Act 1989.