literature review on crime in nigeria

Advertisement

Plea bargaining in the Nigerian criminal justice system: A procedural tool for loot recovery or justice administration?

• Published: 02 February 2022
• Volume 78 , pages 145–164, ( 2022 )

Cite this article

• Habeeb Abdulrauf Salihu   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6049-5143 1  

273 Accesses

2 Citations

Explore all metrics

Plea bargaining is one of the procedural tools introduced into the Nigerian Criminal Justice System to ensure quick dispensation of justice, save time and resources that would have been spent on a trial, and solve the problem of prison congestion in the country. This paper examines the application of this procedural tool in the administration of justice in corruption cases in Nigeria. It argues that plea bargaining is used by the Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC) mainly to recover looted resources from the culprits without giving due consideration to the provisions of the law and the essence and purposes that punishment serves. Also, the application of plea bargaining in various corruption cases has resulted in lighter punishments for the culprits. The paper draws on Deterrence Theory to argue that the way plea bargaining is being applied in corruption cases may encourage corrupt practices, rather than deter offending. Therefore, to achieve a reasonable outcome in fighting corruption in Nigeria, the rule of law must be upheld.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Semiotics of Legal Transplants: Exploring Domestic Violence Justice in Uzbekistan

Utkirbek Kholmirzaev & Zayniddin Shamsidinov

Death Penalty Abolition, the Right to Life, and Necessity

Independence and Accountability of the South African Judiciary

See Section 75-76 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Repeal and Re-enactment Law of Lagos State 2011.

Section 180(1) of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (Establishment) Act 2004 states that ‘Subject to the provisions of Section 174 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 which relates to the power of the Attorney General of the Federation to institute; continue or discontinue criminal proceedings against any provisions in any court of law, the Commission may compound any offence punishable under this Act by accepting such sums of money as it thinks fit, not exceeding the amount of the maximum fine to which that person would be liable if he had been convicted of that offence.

Section 14(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act 1990 states that ‘when more charges than one are made against a person and a conviction has been had on one or more of them the prosecutor may, with the consent of the court, withdraw the remaining charge or charges or the court, of its own motion, may stay the trial of such charge or charges’.

Abdulrahaman, D. A., Ogundiya, I. S., Garba, I., & Danlami, I. M. (2012). “A Nation in the Wilderness: Corruption, Elite Conspiracy and the Illusion of Development in Nigeria” in 50 Years of Nigeria’s Nationhood: Issues and Challenges for Sustainable Development . Faculty of Social Sciences, Usman Dan Fodio University.

Google Scholar  

Abu, N., & Abd Karim, M. Z. (2021). Is the relationship between corruption and domestic investment non-linear in Nigeria? Empirical evidence from quarterly data. Estudios De Economia Aplicada, 39 (3), 1–18.

Adekunle, T. K. (2013). Plea bargaining and the Nigerian penal system: Giving judicial imprimatur to corruption. New Ground Research Journal of Legal Studies Research and Essays, 1 (1), 10–17.

Adeleke, G. O. (2012). Prosecuting Corruption and the Application of Plea Bargaining in Nigeria: A Critique. International Journal of Advanced Legal Stud. & Governance, 3 (1), 53–70.

Adisa, W. B., & Alabi, T. A. (2021). An empirical investigation of court users’ encounters with bribery, judicial extortion and corruption victimisation in Lagos State. Crime Law Soc Change, 75 , 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-020-09931-0

Article   Google Scholar  

Aidonojie, P. A., Oyemwen, O. A., & Omohoste, A. P. (2021). The Legal Impact of Plea Bargain in Settlement of High Profile Financial Criminal Cases in Nigeria. Sriwijaya Law Review, 5 (2), 161–174.

Ajagun, S. O. (2010). ICPC and EFCC: Instruments of Selective Justice in Nigeria. Lwati: A Journal of Contemporary Research , 7 (1), 151-.

Akor, L. Y. (2014). Plea Bargain And The Anti-Corruption Campaign In Nigeria. Global Journal of International Social Sciences, 3 (4), 116–121.

Aluko, O. (2020). Breaking the cycle of corruption in Nigeria: the myth and reality. Journal of Co-Operative and Business Studies, 5 (1), 115–125.

Anaba, I. (2017). Money laundering: INEC official convicted, sentenced. Retrieved June 24, 2021, from https://www.vanguardngr.com/2017/05/money-laundering-inec-official-convicted-sentenced/

Aniche, E.T, Alumona, I.M., & Obiwulu, U.S. (2021). Temper justice with mercy: A public perception of the use of plea bargain in the fight against corruption in Nigeria. Journal of Public Affairs , 21 (2), early cite. 10.1002/pa.2212

Apel, R., & Nagin, D. S. (2011). General deterrence: A review of recent evidence. In M. Tonry (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Crime and Criminal Justice (pp. 179–206). Oxford University Press.

Arikibe, E. O. (2010). Plea bargaining and the Nigerian legal system (2). Daily Sun .

Azubuike, L. (2020). Plea bargaining in Nigeria under the Administration of Criminal justice Act. African Journal of Legal Studies, 1 , 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1163/17087384-12340065

Beccaria, C. (1985). On Crimes and Punishments . Macmillan.

Bezuaye, B., & Oriakhogba, D. (2016). Combating Corruption and the Role of the Judiciary in Nigeria: Beyond Rhetoric and Crassness. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 10 (1), 125–147.

Black’s Law Dictionary. (2004). Plea Bargain Definition. Retrieved April 23, 2017, from http://thelawdictionary.org/.%0A

Brooks, G., Walsh, D., Lewis, C., & Kim, H. (2013). Preventing corruption investigation, enforcement and governance . Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Book   Google Scholar  

Dada, A. A., Dosunmu, A. G., & Oyedeji, G. O. (2015). Criminal Justice System: The Nigeria Scenario. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 3 (3), 437–444.

Daniel, S. (2020). EFCC Re-arrests John Yusuf over N32.8bn Pension fraud. Retrieved June 23, 2021, from https://www.vanguardngr.com/2020/06/efcc-re-arrests-john-yusuf-over-n32-8bn-pension-fraud/

Economic and Financial Crimes Commission. (2013). EFCC Statement: Clarification on Ibru Properties. Retrieved June 23, 2021, from https://www.efccnigeria.org/efcc/news/385-efcc-statement-clarification-on-ibru-properties

Economic and Financial Crimes Commission. (2015). EFCC Record. Retrieved June 23, 2021, from https://www.efccnigeria.org/efcc/what-efcc-did-with-recovered-loot

Economic and Financial Crimes Commission. (2017). EFCC Record. Retrieved October 14, 2021, from https://www.efccnigeria.org/efcc/news/2446-n23bn-diezani-bribe-inec-staff-plead-guilty-two-others-to-face-trial?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=pmd_J0I9vA3rZsZ6thO9wLhALmorFBUivk.T7DtWTrWQSjE-1634833965-0-gqNtZGzNAmWjcnBszQlR

Enweremadu, U. D. (2011). The Judiciary and the Survival of Democracy in Nigeria: Analysis of the 2003-2007 Election: Democratization in Nigeria. Journal of African Election, 10 (1), 114–142.

Ethelbert, O. L. (2016). Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Challenges of Managing Corruption in Nigeria: a Critical Analysis. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 6 (4), 339–349.

Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Cullen, F.. T. (1999). The effects of prison sentences on recidivism. A report to the Corrections Research and Development and Aboriginal Policy . Ottawa.

Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Fulton, B. (2000). Intensive probation in probation and parole settings. In C. R. Hollin (Ed.), Handbook of Offender Assessment and Treatment . Wiley.

Graf, L. J. (2003). How Corruption Affects Persistent Capital Flows. Economics of Governance, 4 , 229–243.

Hoffman, L.K, Patel, R. N. (2017). Collective Action on Corruption in Nigeria: A Social Norm Approach to Connecting Society and Institutions . London.

Human Rights Watch. (2007). Criminal Politics: Violence, “Godfathers” and Corruption in Nigeria. Human Rights Watch , 121. Retrieved from http://csaweb114v.csa.com.proxyau.wrlc.org/ids70/view_record.php?id=2&recnum=2&log=from_res&SID=99jqm5k792s4v4hdmu9oiuh777

Idhiarhi, S. E. (2016). A Synoptic Appraisal of the Practice and Procedure for Plea Bargaining Under the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015. African Journal of Law and Criminology, 6 (1), 12–24.

Igiebor, G. O. (2019). Political Corruption in Nigeria: Implications for Economic Development in the Fourth Republic. Journal of Developing Societies, 35 (4), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X19890745

Ijewereme, B. O. (2015). Anatomy of Corruption in the Nigerian Public Sector: Theoretical Perspectives and Some Empirical Explanations. Retrieved January 15, 2017, from http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm

Integrity Nigeria. (2013). Fighting Corruption with Plea Bargain . Abuja.

Issah, M., Amali, S. E., & Ismail, K. O. (2016). Perceived Effectiveness Of Anti-Graft Agencies: Economic And Financial Crimes In Selected Government Ministries, Nigeria. Acta Criminologica: Southern African Journal of Criminology, 29 (2), 53–72.

Jamilu, I.M, (2015). Corruption in Nigeria: A Criminological Analysis. In International Conference of Social Sciences and Law (ICSSL) . Abuja: Nigerian Turkish Nile university.

Klaveren, V.J, (1990). The Concept of Corruption. In T. . Heidenheimer, A., J.; Johnston, M.; and LeVine, V. (Ed.), Political Corruption: A Handbook. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

Lawrence, E. O. (2016). Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Challenges of Managing Corruption in Nigeria: A Critical Analysis. Journal of Scientific and Research Publications , 6 (4).

Laws of the Federation of Nigeria. Criminal Procedure Act. Chapter 80. (1990).

Laws of the Federation of Nigeria. Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Acts 2000 (2000). Nigeria.

Laws of the Federation of Nigeria. Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (Establishment) Act 2004 (2004).

Laws of the Federation of Nigeria. Administration of Criminal Justice Act Act (ACJA) 2015 (2015).

Manski, C. F., & Pepper, J. V. (2013). Deterrence and the death penalty: Partial identification analysis using repeated cross sections. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29 (1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-012-9172-z

Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (3), 681–712.

McFerson, H. M. (2009). Governance and Hyper-Corruption in Resource-Rich African Countries. Third World Quarterly, 30 (8), 1529–1547.

Mitchell, A. (2002). The Impact of Corruption on Regime Legitimacy: A Comparative Study of Four Latin American Countries. The Journal of Politics, 64 (2), 408–433.

Muramatsu, K., Johnson, D. T., & Yano, K. (2017). The death penalty and homicide deterrence in Japan. Punishment and Society, 20 (4), 432–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474517706369

Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence: A review of the evidence by a criminologist for economists. Annual Review of Economics, 5 , 83–105.

Nguyen, D. V., & Duong, M. T. H. (2021). Shadow Economy, Corruption and Economic Growth: An Analysis of BRICS Countries. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8 (4), 665–672.

Nwabueze, N. (2002). Corruption: A Sociology Perspective” in Adejugbe, M.A. (ed) Perspective on Nigeria’s Fledging Fourth Republic . Lagos: Malthouse, Press Limited.

Nwafor, N. E., & Aduma, O. C. (2020). Problems of the administration of criminal justice system in Nigeria and the applicability of alternative dispute resolution. Journal of Commercial and Property Law, 7 (2), 131–142.

Nwogbo, D. C., & Akhakpe, I. (2021). Governance and Corruption in Nigeria. Journal of Good Governance and Sustainable Development in Africa, 6 (2), 81–97.

Nye, J. (1967). Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis. American Political Science Review, 61 , 417–427.

Odusote, A. (2014). Assets Repatriation and Global Best Practices: Lessons for Nigeria. Acta Universitatis Danubius . Administratio, 6 (1), 71–91.

Ogundiya, I. S. (2009). Political Corruption in Nigeria: Theoretical Perspectives and Some Explanations. Anthropologist, 11 (4), 281–292.

Ojewale, O. (2017). Can Nigeria’s Whistle-Blower Policy Trigger Further Corruption? Real News Magazine (17/02/2017). Retrieved Apri 20, 2017 from http://realnewsmagazine.net/cover/can-nigerias-whistle-blower-policy-trigger-further-corruption/ .

Ojo, L. B., Eusebius, A. C., Ifeanyi, O. J., & Aderemi, T. A. (2020). Political corruption, income inequality and poverty in Nigeria. Acta Universitatis Danubius . Relationes Internationales, 13 (1), 7–19.

Okafor, G., & Piesse, J. (2017). Empirical Investigation into the Determinants of Terrorism: Evidence from Fragile States. Defence and Peace Economics . https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2017.1289746

Okiwe, N. C., Abu, O. P., & Anele, K. A. (2020). Welfare and Effect of Correctional Congestion amongst Inmates in the Niger Delta Region, Nigeria. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 10 (4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.9734/arjass/2020/v10i430153

Onuegbulam, M. C. (2017). Whistleblowing Policy and the Fight against Corruption in Nigeria: Implications for Criminal Justice and the Due Process. Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of International Law and Jurisprudence, 8 (2), 174–179.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1999). Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (Paris: OECD) . Paris.

Osasona, T. (2015). Time to Reform Nigeria’s Criminal Justice System. Journal of Law and Criminal Justice , 3 (2), 73–79. 10.15640/jlcj.v3n2a7

Otusanya, O. J. (2012). An investigation of the Financial Criminal Practices of the Elite in Developing Countries: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Financial Crime, 19 (2), 175–206.

Ozioma, O., & A. H., Abomeh, O., S., & Nkiru, O., C. (2020). Public-private partnership and infrastructural development: implications for economic diversification in Abuja, Nigeria. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 19 (1), 1–10.

Paternoster, R. (2010). How much do we really know about criminal deterrence? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 10 (3), 765–823.

Rauxloh, R. (2012). Plea bargaining in national and international law . Routledge.

Salihu, H. A., & Gholami, H. (2018a). Corruption in the Nigeria Judicial System: An Overview. Journal of Financial Crimes, 25 (3), 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-01-2017-0005

Salihu, H. A. (2020a). Combating corruption in the Nigerian Civil Service: An empirical assessment of treasury single account (TSA) policy. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 23 (1), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-05-2019-0039

Salihu, H. A. (2021). Corruption: an impediment to good governance. Journal of Financial Crime, ahead-of-p. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2020-0235

Salihu, H. A. (2020b). Combating corruption in the Nigerian Civil Service: An empirical assessment of treasury single account (TSA) policy. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 23 (1). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-05-2019-0039

Salihu, H. A., & Gholami, H. (2018b). Mob justice, corrupt and unproductive justice system in Nigeria: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice , 55 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2018.09.003

Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project- SERAP. (2020). Tackling corruption and promoting transparency in Nigeria . Lagos Retrieved from https://luminategroup.com/posts/blog/tackling-corruption-and-promoting-transparency-in-nigeria

Transparency International- The Global Anti-Corruption Coalition. (2017). Corruption Perceptions Index 2016. Transparency International- The Global Anti-Corruption Coalition , 2017. https://doi.org/978-3-943497-18-2

Transparency International. (2015). Corruption Perceptions Index 2015. Corruption Perceptions Index 2015 , 1–3. https://doi.org/978-3-943497-18-2

Transparency International. (2016). Corruption Perception Index 2015. Retrieved from http://www.transparency.org/cpi2015

Umar, I., Samsudin, R. S., & Mohamed, M. (2016). Understanding the successes and challenges of Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) in Nigeria: A case of Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4 (5), 27–33.

UN Office on Drugs and Crime. (2009). Global Report on Trafficking in Persons . UNODC.

Uwakwe, F. (2020). Plea bargain and anti-graft war in Nigeria. International Review of Law and Jurisprudence, 2 (3), 167–172.

Zephyr, T. (2009). The Anti-Corruption Principle. Cornell Law Review, 94 (341), 342–408 Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol94/iss2/8

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Criminology and Security Studies, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria

Habeeb Abdulrauf Salihu

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Habeeb Abdulrauf Salihu .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest, ethics approval.

Not applicable

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Additional information, publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Salihu, H.A. Plea bargaining in the Nigerian criminal justice system: A procedural tool for loot recovery or justice administration?. Crime Law Soc Change 78 , 145–164 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-022-10022-5

Download citation

Accepted : 28 January 2022

Published : 02 February 2022

Issue Date : September 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-022-10022-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC)
• Nigerian criminal justice system
• Plea bargaining
• Loot recovery
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Empirical study of regional policing and crime prevention in South West Nigeria: Amotekun in Perspective

2022, International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies

Insecurity issues have been a major concern for State and people of Nigeria due to the incessant loss of lives and properties. This study assessed the impact of regional policing on crime prevention in South Western part of Nigeria with emphasis on Amotekun operations in Oke Ogun and Ibarapa communities of Oyo State, Nigeria. Descriptive survey was adopted for the purpose of research methodology. A total of 139 respondents were drawn out of the population 1,602,979 using Taro Yarmane's statistical formula and simple random sampling. Copies of questionnaire were distributed to residents to generate information relevant to the research questions raised. The methods of data analysis consisted of cumulative frequency tables, figure, simple percentage, mean average and hypotheses were tested using Chi-Square and correlation statistical tools (Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 23). The study discovered that criminal activities have significantly affected the socioeconomic development of Oyo State in ways such as decline in investments. Challenges of regional policing include: community mistrust, frosty relationship between government security agencies and community members, godfatherism interference, inadequate infrastructure and poor funding and dearth of modern weapons. The study recommended adequate funding, the State government town hall meetings consisting of members of Amotekun, government officials and other security agencies should be organized regularly as to educate the people about the importance of regional policing and its impact on crime prevention.

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Public Health Rev

The Burden of Drug Abuse in Nigeria: A Scoping Review of Epidemiological Studies and Drug Laws

Abubakar ibrahim jatau.

1 School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia

Abubakar Sha’aban

2 School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia

3 Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria

Kabiru Abubakar Gulma

4 School of Global Health and Bioethics, Euclid University, The Gambia

Zayyanu Shitu

5 Hospital Services Management Board, Ministry of health, Gusau, Nigeria

Garba Mohammed Khalid

6 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy

Abubakar Isa

7 Malaria Consortium Nigeria, Dutse, Nigeria

Abubakar S. Wada

8 Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Bayero University Kano, Kano, Nigeria

Mohammed Mustapha

Background: The burden of drug abuse is becoming a public health concern in Nigeria. Preventive measures should include identifying the root causes of the burden for targeted intervention. We, therefore, aim to conduct a scoping review of the literature to summarize the findings of epidemiological studies on drug abuse and provisions of drug laws in Nigeria. The review also provides appropriate recommendations as interventions for prevention.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the literature on PubMed to identify information on drug abuse and drug laws in Nigeria from the inception of the database to March 2020. Additional information was retrieved from Google Scholar, a manual search of included articles, discussion with experts on the subject matter, and gray literature. Study selection was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statements. Information from gray literature was assessed for quality and accuracy using the AACODS checklist (authority, accuracy, coverage, objectively, date, significance).

Results: The systematic search of the literature generated 253 studies. Nine articles were obtained from other sources. After the selection process, 23 eligible studies were included for review. A prevalence of 20–40% and 20.9% of drug abuse was reported among students and youths, respectively. Commonly abused drugs include cannabis, cocaine, amphetamine, heroin, diazepam, codeine, cough syrup and tramadol. Sources where abusers obtained drugs, were pharmacies/patent medicine shops, open drug markets, drug hawkers, fellow drug abusers, friends, and drug pushers. Drug abuse was common among undergraduates and secondary school students, youths, commercial bus drivers, farmers, and sex workers. Reason for use included to increase physical performance, stress and to derive pleasure. Poor socioeconomic factors and low educational background were the common risk factors associated with drug abuse. We identified several drug laws and policies that were established under government agencies such as the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA), National Agency for Foods and Drugs Administration and Control (NAFDAC), Pharmacists Council of Nigeria (PCN) and a Presidential Advisory Committee.

Conclusion: Findings from epidemiological studies on drug abuse in Nigeria has demonstrated that the burden of drug abuse is still high despite the existing drug laws, policies, and strategies for prevention. Measures to reduce the burden should involve the community, government, and religious bodies. Preventive measures should target the youths, the students, identified sources of the drugs, reasons and risk factors associated with drug abuse in Nigeria.

Introduction

Drug abuse is emerging as a global public health issue. The recent world drug report-2019 of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) estimated that 271 million (5.5%) of the global population (aged between 15 and 64 years), had used drugs in the previous year [ 1 ]. Also, it has been projected that 35 million individuals will be experiencing drug use disorders [ 1 ]. Further, the Global Burden of disease Study 2017 estimated that, in 2017, there were 585,000 deaths due to drug use, globally [ 1 ]. The burden of drug abuse (usage, abuse, and trafficking) has also been related to the four areas of international concern, viz. organized crime, illicit financial flows, corruption, and terrorism/insurgency [ 2 ]. Therefore, global interventions for preventing drug abuse including its impact on health, governance, and security, requires a widespread understanding of the prevalence, frequently implicated drugs, commonly involved population, sources of the drugs and risk factors associated with the drug abuse.

In Nigeria, the burden of drug abuse is on the rise and becoming a public health concern. Nigeria, which is the most populous country in Africa, has developed a reputation as a center for drug trafficking and usage mostly among the youth population [ 5 , 6 ]. According to the 2018 UNODC report “Drug use in Nigeria”—The first large-scale, nationwide national drug use survey in Nigeria, one in seven persons (aged 15–64 years) had used a drug in the past year [ 3 ]. Also, one in five individuals who had used drug in the past year is suffering from drug-related disorders [ 3 ]. Drug abuse has been a cause of many criminal offences such as theft, burglary, sex work, and shoplifting [ 3 ].

Nigeria is an enormously diverse country with over 400 ethnicities and many religious groups [ 9 ]. Drug abuse is therefore viewed within a broader context in Nigeria, due to its multicultural nature. For instance, most societies do not consider the use of some drugs which do not produce overt behavioral changes as drug abuse. However, despite this multicultural nature of the Nigerian population, there is a consistent outcry from both the public, police, preachers, health professionals, teachers, regulatory agencies and parents on the growing burden of drug abuse (abuse of drugs which affect behavior) in the country. The recent call was that of the President of the Pharmaceutical Society of Nigeria [ 4 ].

Efforts to prevent the growing burden of drug abuse in Nigeria involve the identification of evidence-based information on the extent of the problem, from epidemiological studies. To date, most of the information on drug abuse in Nigeria is reported by the media (print, electronic and online). However, scientific evidence from epidemiological studies has started emerging in recent years. Although there were attempts in the past to summarize such studies in the form of a narrative review, such reviews were limited with lack of systematic search of the literature. Also, such studies were published in 1982 [ 5 ], 1991 [ 6 ], and 1992 [ 7 ]. There is, therefore, a need for recent summarized data on drug abuse in Nigeria. We, therefore, aim to conduct a scoping review of the literature to summarize the findings of epidemiological studies on drug abuse and provisions of drug laws in Nigeria. In this review, we attempt to summarize the results from various studies regarding the prevalence of drug abuse, commonly abused drugs, sources of the drugs, group of people frequently involved, the reason for drug abuse, risk factors, extant policies and laws, and to recommend intervention measures for prevention.

Literature Search

In the literature search, we have not restricted our sources of information to any specific period. A systematic search of the literature regarding drug abuse in Nigeria was conducted using PubMed from the inception of the database to March 13, 2020. A search strategy using the following terms both as medical sub-heading (MeSH) and free text as title and abstract (tiab) was developed. The search terms used included: “abuse drug” [MeSH], “abuse drug” [tiab], “illicit drug use” [tiab], “drug, illicit” [MeSH], “psychoactive drugs” [MeSH], Nigeria [tiab]. Relevant studies were also identified manually from the reference lists of the included articles and discussion with experts on the subject matter. Additional information was also retrieved from Google Scholar using the following search expression “Drug abuse, illicit drug abuse, psychotropic abuse in Nigeria.” Based on previous recommendations, only the first 200 search results from the Google scholar search were considered for inclusion [ 8 ]. The search strategies employed in the systematic search of the literature in PubMed and Google Scholar is provided in Appendix 1 . Due to limited research on drug abuse in Nigeria, gray literature related to drug abuse in Nigeria were identified in Google search, web pages of drug regulatory agencies in Nigeria, and the UNODC. Information from gray literature was evaluated for trustworthiness and relevance based on AACODS (Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Date, Significance) checklist [ 9 ].

Study Selection

Studies or reports were included in this review based on the following criteria: reporting prevalence/incidence of drug abuse in Nigeria; conducted among different populations in the community, government policies and interventions on drug abuse; and drug laws in Nigeria. Studies or reports were excluded from this review if they focused on alcohol abuse only. Disagreements between authors regarding study selection were resolved through discussion until consensus was reached. Figure 1 demonstrates the study selection process.

PRISMA Flowchart for the study selection process.

Data Extraction

Information extracted from the included studies included: study authors, population/sample size, settings, prevalence, commonly abused drugs, sources, reasons, and factors associated with the drug abuse.

Operational Definition

There was no universal definition of the term “Drug abuse” in the literature. In this review, the definition of drug abuse by Benjamin and Chidi (2014) was adopted and modified [ 10 ]. “the use of a drug that is not generally accepted on medical ground, i.e. continuous or occasional use of drugs that would cause overt behavioral change by the individual either of his own choice or under a feeling of compulsion, to achieve his wellbeing or what he conceives as of his own wellbeing” [ 10 ].

Results and Discussion

The initial search PubMed and Google Scholar generated 53 articles and 200 records, respectively. One study was identified following discussion with an expert, two from a manual search of included studies and six articles from Google search. The screening for duplicates excluded twenty-two articles. One hundred and forty-eight articles were removed after screening for title and abstracts, and 62 studies did not meet the eligibility criteria and were excluded. A total of 30 studies were included in this review; 23 epidemiological studies [ 3 , 11 – 21 , 23 – 32 ], one thesis inclusive [ 22 ], five reports from the websites of drug-related agencies [ 38 , 41 , 43 , 44 ] and UNODC [ 2 ], and two articles from newspapers[ 40 , 45 ]. Figure 1 illustrates the study selection process.

Nine of the included epidemiological studies were conducted among secondary school students [ 12 , 16 , 21 – 24 , 27 , 30 , 31 ], five among drug abusers [ 15 , 18 , 25 , 29 , 32 ], four among undergraduate students [ 17 , 20 , 26 , 28 ], three among members of different populations in the community [ 3 , 11 , 14 ], two among commercial vehicle drivers [ 13 , 19 ]. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the included studies.

Summary of the included epidemiological studies.

FCT, Federal Capital Territory; LSD, Lysergic acid diethylamide; NR, Percentage not reported in the study.

Prevalence of Drug Abuse in Nigeria

Of the 23 epidemiological studies, only seven reported an overall prevalence of drug abuse among the study sample [ 3 , 11 - 13 , 21 , 22 , 27 ]. Given the heterogenic nature of the studies, determination of the pool prevalence of drug abuse in Nigeria may not be possible. Four of the studies were conducted among secondary school students and reported a prevalence between 20 and 40% [ 12 , 21 , 22 , 27 ]. A prevalence of 14.4% was reported among members of the general public (all ages), 20.9% among youths in the community [ 11 ], and 81.1% among commercial bus drivers [ 13 ].

Commonly Abused Drugs in Nigeria

The most frequently implicated drugs, consistently reported by the majority of the studies were; cannabis [ 3 , 12 , 14 , 16 - 19 , 21 , 22 , 24 - 31 ], codeine [ 3 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 24 , 25 , 28 ], amphetamine/dexamphetamine [ 3 , 14 - 17 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 29 , 32 ], heroin [ 3 , 14 , 16 – 18 , 21 , 22 , 26 , 27 ], cocaine [ 12 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 18 , 21 , 22 , 25 ], diazepam [ 26 , 27 , 30 – 32 ], and cough syrup [ 3 , 14 – 16 ], Reactivan (fencamfamine) [ 16 , 31 ], Mandrax [ 27 , 29 – 31 ], and tramadol [ 3 , 11 , 13 ].

Some drugs were frequently reported by studies published in the early 80s [ 29 – 32 ]. Proplus (caffeine 50 mg) was reported by three papers published in 1982 [ 30 – 32 ], and Madrax (Methadone and diphenhydramine) in studies published between 1981 and 2011 [ 27 , 29 – 31 ]. The absence of these drugs in recent studies may be related to the decline in their availability in Nigeria.

Cannabis was the most abused drug reported across the different study populations. The prevalence of cannabis abuse among members of the general public was 10.8% [ 3 ] and 22.7% among adolescents of 25 years and younger [ 14 ]. The frequency of abuse among secondary school students was between 0.6 and 34%, with a pooled prevalence of 12.5% [ 12 , 16 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 31 ]. The abuse of cannabis among undergraduate students was also common, with a prevalence of 8–11% [ 17 , 26 , 28 ].

The frequency of cocaine abuse ranges from 1.6 to 4.8% among secondary school students [ 12 , 16 , 21 , 22 ], 0.6–10% among undergraduate students [ 26 , 28 , 33 ] and 0.1–0.6% among members of the general public [ 3 , 14 ]. The widespread use of cocaine in Nigeria may be related to easy access due to increased trafficking of drugs despite the existing legal control measures [ 22 , 34 ].

Codeine was the third most frequently reported drug of abuse from the included studies. The prevalence of abuse in the general public (all ages) was 2.4% [ 3 ], and 22.7% among adolescent [ 14 ]. A prevalence of 3–8.2% [ 17 , 28 ], and between 5.3 and 28% [ 12 , 24 ] was recorded among undergraduate students and secondary school students respectively. Table 1 indicates the frequently abused drugs. The high rates of drug abuse among the younger persons could reflect the easy accessibility of these drugs, peer group influence and possibly lack of effective counseling programs in secondary schools and universities.

Sources Where Drug Abusers Obtained Drugs

Identifying the sources where drug abusers obtained drugs is essential in preventing drug abuse in Nigeria. Interventions to block the supply of these drugs from identified sources could reduce the increasing prevalence of drug abuse. Only five studies reported the sources of the drugs being abused. The common sources included: pharmacies/patent medicine shops (23–33%) [ 15 , 25 , 31 , 32 ], open markets (17%) [ 31 ], drug hawkers [ 25 , 32 ], hawkers of traditional herbal preparations [ 25 ], fellow drug abusers (8%) [ 15 ], underground agents (57%) [ 31 ], family members (1.6–33%) [ 22 , 27 , 31 ], friends (up to 61%) [ 22 , 27 ], teachers (3%) [ 22 , 27 ], physician (8.3%) [ 22 ], other health practitioners (3.0%) [ 22 ].

Reasons for Drug Abuse in Nigeria

Determination of the reasons why people indulged in drug abuse may guide the development and implementation of targeted interventions for reducing the burden of drug abuse in Nigeria. The eleven studies that reported the reasons for drug abuse gave several reasons. The commonly reported reasons included the following: to increase physical performance [ 11 , 13 , 14 , 17 , 19 , 30 , 32 ], to drive pleasure [ 13 , 14 , 17 , 27 , 30 ], desire to relax/sleep [ 13 , 14 , 17 , 27 , 30 ], experiment/curiosity [ 15 , 19 , 26 , 30 , 31 ], to keep awake [ 19 , 25 , 27 , 30 , 32 ], to relieve stress [ 13 , 14 , 17 ], to relieve anxiety [ 13 , 15 , 27 ], unemployment [ 14 , 17 ], frustration [ 14 , 15 ], and easy access [ 16 , 25 ].

Exterior or curiosity motives, often in the form of extreme explorative curiosity to experience ‘the unknown’ about drugs, motivate individuals into drug use and subsequent drug misuse and abuse. The first experience in drug abuse produces a state of arousal in the form of extreme happiness and pleasure, which in turn motivates users to continue [ 34 ]. With the high poverty rate of about 50% of people living in extreme poverty in Nigeria [ 35 ], and the rising rate of unemployment (23.1%) [ 36 ], indicate how challenging the socioeconomic condition could be for many Nigerians. These conditions could predispose people to engage in drug abuse to work harder to earn a living or to ward off the stress and frustration of daily living in hardship.

Risk Factors Associated With Drug Abuse

Nineteen of the included studies examined factors that could raise people’s likelihood of drug abuse [ 3 , 11 – 23 , 25 , 27 – 32 ]. Among the frequently reported factors included being a male gender [ 3 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 18 - 20 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 32 ], younger age [ 3 , 15 , 17 , 27 , 29 , 32 ], poor economic status [ 13 , 14 , 25 , 28 ], unemployment [ 14 , 18 , 25 ], and parental deprivation (broken home) [ 14 , 15 , 28 , 30 , 31 ], Other factors included having a lower education level [ 13 , 28 , 32 ], and peer-group influence [ 15 , 22 , 23 , 28 , 30 , 31 ].

Younger population aged ≤35 years older was the most common group of people indulged in drug abuse based on the data of the included studies. The prevalence of drug abuse among this population may be the reason why some of the studies were specifically conducted among this group of people in the general population [ 11 , 14 ], undergraduate students [ 17 , 20 , 26 ], and secondary school students [ 12 , 16 , 21 – 24 , 26 , 27 , 30 , 31 ]. Also, studies have shown that over 50% of persons with drug abuse-related psychiatric admission were secondary school students [ 29 , 32 ]. These findings also suggest that the prevalence of drug abuse among secondary school students is high. Young people are the most valuable asset for sustainable social development in any society, but most of this population lacks awareness of substance addiction which would empower them to escape drug abuse. This limitation is demonstrated in a study carried out among secondary school teachers and students in Nigeria [ 37 ]. The study revealed that approximately 60% of students were never exposed to drug abuse education, while 73% of teachers reported that they currently did not teach their students about drug abuse education. This finding could be another reason for the highest prevalence in younger populations, and a crucial gap that could be targeted for interventions.

Determinants of drug abuse also included those related to family background. Individuals from polygamous family backgrounds, dysfunctional families (parental deprivation), being single and having parents or relatives who abuse drugs are more likely than those who are not to abuse drugs [ 14 , 17 , 18 , 28 ]. Since in most cases children from broken families or polygamous families are left alone to feed themselves and their desire to go to school is often not of great concern to family members. Thus, to escape the reality of frustration and family strain, they find themselves entangled in substance abuse habits.

The peer-group influence was a predictor of drug abuse which most studies consistently reported. People with friends who abuse drugs are more likely than those with friends who do not abuse drugs to engage in the act [ 15 , 22 , 23 , 30 , 31 ].

The same author identified religion as a protective determinant of drug abuse in Nigeria in two studies [ 19 , 20 ]. Makanjuola et al. found that undergraduate medical students who are religious are less likely than those who were not to engage in drug abuse [ 20 ]. Further, religious commercial drivers are less probable to engage in drug abuse than those who are not religious [ 19 ]. Commercial drivers in Nigeria constitute an integral part of socioeconomic growth, on which the majority of the public depend for transport. Preventing drug abuse among commercial vehicle operators in Nigeria will, therefore ensure optimum safety for the people.

Psychiatric Admission due to Drug Abuse

Three studies were on psychiatric admission due to drug abuse [ 25 , 29 , 32 ]. The studies were conducted in Kaduna state (northwestern region) in 1986 [ 29 ], Edo state (south southern region) in 1976 [ 32 ], and the other was performed at all psychiatric facilities in Nigeria [ 25 ]. Findings of these studies showed the psychiatric symptoms resulting in admissions included toxic psychosis, anxiety state, schizophrenia, delusion [ 25 , 32 ]. There was no suicide case recorded in all the studies.

Policy and Laws Against Drug Abuse in Nigeria

In Nigeria, the fight against drug abuse is backed by federal laws as far back as 1935. Since then, many laws were enacted, while others were amended leading to the establishment of the National Drug Laws Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) -an agency with the sole responsibility of tackling drug abuse and related offences [ 38 ]. Some of the most important laws against the cultivation, trafficking, and abuse of illicit drugs in Nigeria are as follows [ 38 ]:

• 1 The Dangerous Drugs Ordinance of 1935 enacted by the British Colonial administration.
• 2 The Indian Hemp Decree No. 19 of 1966.
• 3 The Indian Hemp (Amendment) Decree No. 34 of 1979.
• 4 The Indian Hemp (Amendment) Decree, and the Special Tribunal (Miscellaneous Offences) Decree No. 20 of 1984.
• 5 >The Special Tribunal (Miscellaneous Offences) (Amendment) Decree of 1986 and the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency Decree No. 48 of 1989 (as amended by Decree No.33 of 1990, Decree No 15 of 1992 and Decree No. 62 of 1999). These laws were harmonized as an Act of the parliament, CAP N30 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria (LFN) 2004. This Act established the NDLEA.

Government Efforts in Preventing Drug Abuse in Nigeria

The NDLEA has been launching nationwide enforcement activities to seize drugs of abuse and arrest drug abusers in the community; sensitization program, rehabilitation and border patrol to checkmate trafficking of illicit drugs to and from Nigeria [ 38 ]. The 2019 NDLEA report has shown that in the last 10 years of operations, a total of 56, 745, 795, 555 kg of drugs were seized, 85, 058 persons with drug-related offences were arrested and 16, 937 cases were secured and convicted [ 39 ].

Recently, The Federal government of Nigeria, through Pharmacists Council of Nigeria (PCN) -an agency in charge of regulating the practice of pharmacy in Nigeria, banned the operation of open drug markets in Nigeria [ 40 ]. This effort was introduced to sanitize the drug distribution system in the country. The PCN also prohibits the handling of drugs by unlicensed personnel, especially prescription and controlled only drugs [ 41 ].

The National Agency for Foods and Drugs Administration and Control (NAFDAC), an agency of the Federal government of Nigeria, banned the manufacturing, importation and sale (without a valid prescription) of codeine and codeine-containing syrups in Nigeria [ 42 ]. In 2018, the agency shut down some pharmaceutical companies involved in the manufacturing of codeine-containing syrups in the country [ 43 ].

Other strategies by the Federal government include the establishment of the National Drug Control Master Plan (NDCMP) [ 44 ]. The NDCMP is a national blueprint for addressing the complex issues of drug trafficking, production, cultivation, and abuse in Nigeria. In 2018, the Federal government constituted a Presidential Advisory Committee for the Elimination of Drug abuse in Nigeria. The committee was saddled with the responsibility of advising the government on ways to reduce the increasing burden of drug abuse in the country [ 45 ]. However, the literature suggests that the burden of drug abuse may continue to rise in Nigeria due to the involvement of politics in law enforcement and lack of political goodwill [ 46 , 47 ].

Gaps Identified in the Included Literature

• 1 Results from the included studies have shown that, despite the existence of Federal drug laws, and national drug policies and strategies, the burden of drug abuse and proliferation of controlled drugs are still on the increase in the country.
• 2 Most of the epidemiological studies were conducted among secondary school students. Only a few studies were performed among the general population to identify other vulnerable groups of people involved in drug abuse.
• 3 Only three studies were conducted on psychiatric admission related to drug abuse. Of the three studies, the most recent was published in 1986.
• 4 Only a few studies reported sources of drugs, reasons for the abuse and risk factors associated with drug abuse. Identifying this information could guide the implementation of interventions.

Recommendations

Reports from the included studies demonstrate that intervention measures to prevent drug abuse in Nigeria should be all-inclusive. The government, society, religious bodies, Non-Governmental Organisations as well as individuals all have a role to play. The efforts are numerous and not exhaustive. Below are some recommendations that might be applied to address the growing epidemic:

• (1)The government should provide more employment opportunities to the youths and review existing drug laws to include stiffer penalties for offenders [ 38 ]. Allocation of funds to drug-related agencies should be increased to better the fight against the abuse of drugs. Enforcement activities should be more effective through strengthening the activities of taskforce at Federal and State governments levels. Nigerian borders should be well protected with surveillance activities by responsible agencies.
• (2)Applying the conceptual model for understanding adverse drug events in the community [ 48 ]. Intervention measures based on Group-focused Cognitive Behavioral Health Education Program (GCBHEP) should be adopted to improve awareness and behavioral change [ 49 ]. Based on the model, other community-based education awareness in the form of mass campaigns through media houses both print and electronic, adverts, flyers, banners, radio jingles, lectures and other programs in religious places and public functions should be created and sustained [ 48 ].
• (3)Secondary school-based programs aimed at encouraging healthy practices and lifestyle among adolescents would help to prevent substance use. There is also a need for periodic review of the curriculum in schools to introduce topics centered on dangers of drug abuse.
• (4)Parents need to educate their children early enough on the risks associated with drug abuse [ 3 , 15 , 17 , 27 , 29 , 32 ]. They should monitor the children closely and know the kinds of friends they are keeping [ 15 , 22 , 23 , 28 , 30 , 31 ].

Limitations

The present review has the following limitations; first, the systematic search of the literature was limited to two electronic databases. This approach may have excluded some eligible studies in the review. Secondly, we have not assessed the qualities of the included studies in this review. We have attempted to summarize their findings within this limitation and hope that readers, would be aware of such shortcomings, and be cautious in drawing conclusions from them.

Findings from the epidemiological studies, reports and drug laws in Nigeria have shown that the burden of drug abuse is growing despite several drug laws, policies and strategic plans to prevent it. The prevalence is higher among the younger population, males, undergraduate and secondary school students, and commercial vehicle drivers. The most abused drugs included cannabis, amphetamine, codeine, cocaine and heroin. The major sources for the drugs were pharmacies/patent medicine stores, drug hawkers, friends who are abusers and drug pushers. The frequent reasons for indulging into drug abuse were to improve physical performance, to drive pleasure, desire to sleep, to experiment/curiosity motives, and to keep awake. Factors such as poor socioeconomic status, peer-group pressure, family problems and poor academic performance were commonly associated with drug abuse in Nigeria. Drug abuse has been a cause of many debilitating conditions such as schizophrenia and psychosis, leading to psychiatric admissions. Therefore, stringent measures and sustainable interventions are urgently needed to curb the increasing burden of drug abuse in Nigeria.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors will like to thank and appreciate the efforts of: Anas Haruna, Auwal Bala, Baraka Ado, Abubakar Bilyaminu, Sa’idu Burji, Dahiru Malami, Abubakar Danbatta, Abdulmunin Shehu, Hafsat Nasidi, Inuwa Bello, Ismaeel Yunusa, Mubarak Hussain, Safiya Abdulkadir, Sagir Mustapha, and Salim Ilyasu of the Young Pharmacists Scholars (YPS) mentoring forum for the guidance, mentoring, encouragement and support in developing this review.

Search strategies used in the systematic search of the literature

Abbreviations

AACODS, authority, accuracy, coverage, date, significance; FCT, federal capital territory; GCBHEP, group-focused cognitive behavioral health education program; FN, laws of the federation of nigeria; LSD, lysergic acid diethylamide; MeSH, medical sub-heading; NAFDAC, national agency for foods and drugs administration and control; NDCMP, national drug control master plan; NDLEA, national drug law enforcement agency; PCN, pharmacists council of Nigeria; PRISMA, preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses; UNODC, nations office on drugs and crime; YPS, young pharmacists scholars.

The Pivotal Role of Prison Libraries as an Information Resource for Prisoner Rehabilitation

An integrative review of the literature.

• Olusegun Opesanwo Dominion University, Ibadan
• Dr. Oluyọmi Awofeso Dominion University, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria

This article delves into the multifaceted roles of prison libraries in rehabilitating and reintegrating incarcerated individuals. It begins by underscoring the significance of education in correctional facilities and the inherent challenges of providing access to educational resources due to security constraints. The primary objective of this study is to scrutinize the theoretical underpinnings that drive the rehabilitative functions of prison libraries and identify existing gaps in the literature. This research, through a comprehensive analysis of various empirical studies, reveals the pivotal role played by prison libraries in fostering personal growth, facilitating social integration among inmates, serving as havens where prisoners are afforded the autonomy to choose their reading materials, empowering them to enhance their lives through self-directed learning, and contributing to cultural enrichment, literacy advancement, and preparation for successful reintegration into society. The findings of this integrated literature review underscore the constructive influence of prison libraries on effective time management and offering meaningful activities for prisoner rehabilitation. This study highlights the need for further research that amalgamates robust theoretical frameworks with empirical evidence, thereby establishing how prison libraries can efficaciously contribute to prisoner rehabilitation. This study also informs policy formulation to enable correctional institutions to utilize these insights to bolster behavioural management strategies.

Author Biographies

Olusegun opesanwo, dominion university, ibadan.

Olusegun Adebayo Opesanwo is a lecturer, a librarian, and an emerging scholar working at Dominion University in Ibadan, Nigeria. He holds an MLS degree from the University of Ibadan, Nigeria and is currently pursuing a PhD in Academic Librarianship. Before his appointment as a librarian, he had worked as a high school teacher for close to two decades. His research interests include social media, knowledge management, information practices, information literacy, user studies, and emerging technologies in library and information science. His contributions have been published in scholarly journals, and he actively engages in professional networks to foster knowledge exchange. Olusegun Opesanwo plays a vital role in supporting information access and promoting effective use of library resources.

Dr. Oluyọmi Awofeso, Dominion University, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria

Oluyọmi A, Awofẹsọ holds a PhD in Sociology from the University of Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Her PhD research investigated Post-founder business enterprise (dis)continuity. She worked as a Cambridge A- Level Sociology tutor for over a decade teaching module related to mainstream sociology, education, family, global development , religion amongst others. Also, she served as a school administrator (in a private school) for half a decade before joining Dominion University, Ibadan, Oyo State as a lecturer in the Department of Criminology and Security Studies in 2021. Her interest in Criminal Justice, in general, and Criminal Rehabilitation, in particular, was developed while working with the Department.  Awofeso is an early career researcher currently working as an independent researcher with research interests in Sociological theory; enterprise survival; prison entrepreneurship; prisoner re-entry, prisoner rehabilitation; community-based corrections as well as crime prevention. She is also a volunteer with “Environmental Conflict Mediation and Women Development Initiative” - an NGO committed to climate change and the well being of women.

Copyright (c) 2024 Olusegun Opesanwo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License .

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: see Author Agreement . Articles are licensed under a CC-BY-NC-ND license.

Information

• For Readers
• For Authors
• For Librarians

ISSN 2574-3430

IJIDI logo created by Craig Taylor.