Geographical focus of social enterprise and network studies
Geographical focus | No. of articles |
---|---|
Developed economies | 35 |
Emerging/transition economies | 11 |
Developing economies | 8 |
Multiple country studies | 30 |
No explicit geographical focus | 21 |
Positions of networks in social enterprise literature
Network as the empirical focus | Social entrepreneur networking activities | Social enterprise network compositions and implications | Networks and social enterprise/social entrepreneurship processes |
---|---|---|---|
, , ); ; Scott and Laine (2011); ; ; | . (2006), , , ), . (2009), . (2017), Rakic . (2017), , Jammulamadaka . (2018) | , . (2012), Meyskens . (2009, 2013), ; , , | , , Christopoulos and Vogl (2014), . (2016), . (2016), , |
Examples: examine what they describe as a social enterprise network in Bradford, West Yorkshire. They explore sense-making by various actors within this network. Interestingly in this case, this network is not formalised. This contrasts with the earlier work of . (2006) where the network ‘WestFocus’ Partnership was formalised. Finally, more recent work by , examine developments in the global fair trade movement/network | Examples: Early work by . (2006) highlighted the importance of “strategic networking” in developing emerging social enterprises. More recent work by . (2017) identifies not only the significance of social entrepreneur’s networks in motivating their activity but also the important role networking activity and domestic and international networks can play for social entrepreneurs to acquire resources, achieve legitimacy and in social value creation | Examples: argue that the embeddedness of the social entrepreneur and social enterprise, which is in turn affected by geographic factors, has implications for their selection of social entrepreneurial pursuits. They also suggest that degree of structural embeddedness influence processes of measuring and scaling social value creation. In a second example, examine the social capital of social enterprise and the opportunities stemming from this for collaboration and sustainability | Examples: . (2016) examine the emergence of social enterprise ecosystems drawing upon stakeholder network perspectives and biological evolutionary theory. Baringa (2017) explores through a framework of ANT the nascent organising of social entrepreneurial ventures |
Keywords Plus® is an additional feature of Web of Science whereby all titles are reviewed, and additional relevant but overlooked keywords that were not listed by the author or publisher, are highlighted. This potentially enables the discovery of more relevant papers in a search.
Adler , PS and Kwon , SW ( 2002 ), “ Social capital: prospects for a new concept ”, Academy of Management Review , Vol. 27 , pp. 17 - 40 .
Aguinis , H. and Glavas , A. ( 2012 ), “ What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda ”, Journal of Management , Vol. 38 No. 4 , pp. 932 - 968 .
Aidis , R. , Estrin , S. , Mickiewcz , T. and, ( 2008 ), “ Institutions and entrepreneurship development in russia: a comparative perspective ”, Journal of Business Venturing , Vol. 23 No. 6 , pp. 656 - 672 .
Bacq , S. and Janssen , F. ( 2011 ), “ The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: a review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria ”, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development , Vol. 23 Nos 5/6 , pp. 373 - 403 .
Baker , T. , Miner , A. and Eesley , D. ( 2003 ), “ Improvising firms: Bricolage, retrospective interpretation and improvisational competencies in the founding process ”, Research Policy , Vol. 32 No. 2 , pp. 255 - 276 .
Barinaga , E. ( 2017 ), “ Tinkering with space: the organizational practices of a nascent social venture, organisation ”, Studies , Vol. 38 No. 7 , pp. 937 - 958 .
Baum , J.A.C. , Calabrese , T. and Silverman , B.S. ( 2000 ), “ Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups’ performance in canadian biotechnology ”, Strategic Management Journal , Vol. 21 No. 3 , pp. 267 - 294 .
Bhatt , P. and Ahmad , A.J. ( 2017 ), “ Financial social innovation to engage the economically marginalized: insights from an indian case study ”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , Vol. 29 No. 56 , pp. 391 - 413 .
Birley , S. ( 1985 ), “ The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process ”, Journal of Business Venturing , Vol. 1 No. 1 , pp. 107 - 117 .
Bourdieu , P. ( 1980 ), “ Le Capital social[social Capital.] ”, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 31 Sociales , pp. 2 - 3 .
Bradley , S.W. , McMullen , J.S. , Artz , K. and Simiyu , E.M. ( 2012 ), “ Capital is not enough: innovation in developing economies ”, Journal of Management Studies , Vol. 49 No. 4 , pp. 684 - 717 .
Bruderl , J. and Preisendo , P. ( 1998 ), “ Network support and the success of newly founded businesses ”, Small Business Economics , Vol. 10 , pp. 213 - 225 .
Burt , R. ( 1992 ), Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , Harvard University Press , Cambridge .
Butler , J.E. and Hansen , G.S. ( 1991 ), “ Network evolution, entrepreneurial success, and regional development ”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , Vol. 3 , pp. 1 - 15 .
Casson , M. and Della Giusta , M. ( 2007 ), “ Entrepreneurship and social Capital: analysing the impact of social networks on entrepreneurial activity from a rational action perspective ”, International Small Business Journal , Vol. 25 No. 3 , pp. 220 - 244 .
Chell , E. and Baines , S. ( 2000 ), “ Networking, entrepreneurship and microbusiness behaviour ”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , Vol. 12 , pp. 195 - 215 .
Choi , N. and Majumdar , S. ( 2014 ), “ Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: opening a new avenue for systematic future research ”, Journal of Business Venturing , Vol. 29 No. 3 , pp. 363 - 376 .
Christopoulos , D. and Vogl , S. ( 2015 ), “ The motivation of social entrepreneurs: the roles, agendas and relations of altruistic economic actors ”, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship , Vol. 6 No. 1 , pp. 1 - 30 .
Dacin , P.A. , Dacin , M.T. and Tracey , P. ( 2011 ), “ Social entrepreneurship: a critique and future directions ”, Organization Science , Vol. 22 No. 5 , pp. 1203 - 1213 .
Dacin , P.A. , Dacin , M.T. and Matear , M. ( 2010 ), “ Social entrepreneurship: why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here ”, Academy of Management Perspectives , Vol. 24 No. 3 , p. 3 .
De Beer , M. ( 2018 ), “ Local social value creation by neighborhood-based entrepreneurs: local embeddedness and the role of social networks ”, Social Enterprise Journal ,
Dees , J.G. ( 2003 ), “ Social entrepreneurship is about innovation and impact, not income. Social edge ”, available at: https://centers.fuqua.duke.edu/case/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2015/02/Article_Dees_SEisAboutInnovationandImpactNotIncome
Defourny , J. and Nyssens , M. ( 2006 ), “ Defining social enterprise ”, in Social Enterprises – at the Crossroads of Market, Public Policies and Civil Society , (Ed.), M. Nyssens , Routledge , London and New York, NY , pp. 3 - 26 .
Defourny , J. and Nyssens , M. ( 2006 ), “ Social enterprise in Europe: recent trends and developments ”, Social Enterprise Journal , Vol. 4 No. 3 , pp. 202 - 228 .
Di Falco , S. and Bulte , E. ( 2011 ), “ A dark side of social Capital? Kinship, consumption, and savings ”, Journal of Development Studies , Vol. 47 No. 8 , pp. 1128 - 1151 .
Dufays , F. and Huybrechts , B. ( 2014 ), “ Connecting the dots for social value: a review on social networks and social entrepreneurship ”, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship , Vol. 5 No. 2 , pp. 214 - 237 .
Easter , S. and Conway , M. ( 2015 ), “ Bridging ties across contexts to scale social value: the case of a vietnamese social enterprise ”, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship , Vol. 6 No. 3 , pp. 320 - 351 .
Elfring , T. and Hulsink , W. ( 2003 ), Small Business Economics , Vol. 21 , pp. 409 - 422 .
Estrin , S. , Mickiewicz , T. and Stephan , U. ( 2013 ), “ Entrepreneurship, social Capital, and institutions: social and commercial entrepreneurship across nations ”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , Vol. 37 No. 3 , pp. 479 - 504 .
Folmer , E. , Nederveen , C. and Schutjens , V. ( 2018 ), “ Network importance and use: commercial versus social enterprises ”, Social Enterprise Journal , DOI: TBC .
Friedman , V.J. and Desivilya , H. ( 2010 ), “ Integrating social entrepreneurship and conflict engagement for regional development in divided societies ”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , Vol. 22 No. 6 , pp. 495 - 514 .
Granovetter , M. ( 1973 ), “ The strength of weak ties ”, American Journal of Sociology , Vol. 78 No. 6 , pp. 1360 - 1380 .
Greve , A. and Salaff , J. ( 2003 ), “ Social networks and entrepreneurship ”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , Vol. 28 No. 1 , pp. 1 - 22 .
Hazenberg , R. , Bajwa-Patel , M. , Mazzei , M. , Roy , M.J. and Baglioni , S. ( 2016 ), “ The role of institutional and stakeholder networks in shaping social enterprise ecosystems in Europe ”, Social Enterprise Journal , Vol. 12 No. 3 , pp. 302 - 321 .
Hite , J.M. and Hesterly , W.S. ( 2001 ), “ The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm ”, Strategic Management Journal , Vol. 22 No. 3 , pp. 275 - 286 .
Hoang , H. and Bostjan , A. ( 2003 ), “ Network-based research in entrepreneurship ”, a Critical Review. Journal of Business Venturing , Vol. 18 No. 2 , pp. 165 - 187 .
Isenberg , D.J. ( 2010 ), “ The big idea: How to start an entrepreneurial revolution ”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 88 No. 6 , pp. 40 - 50 .
Jack , S.L. ( 2005 ), “ The role, use and activation of strong and weak network ties: a qualitative analysis ”, Journal of Management Studies , Vol. 42 No. 6 , pp. 1231 - 1259 .
Jack , S.L. and Anderson , A.R. ( 2002 ), “ The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process ”, Journal of Business Venturing , Vol. 17 No. 5 , pp. 467 - 487 .
Jammulamadaka , N. and Chakraborty , K. ( 2018 ), “ Local geographies of developing country social enterprises ”, Social Enterprise Journal , Vol. 14 No. 3 , pp. 367 - 386 .
Jenner , P. ( 2016 ), “ Social enterprise sustainability revisited; an international comparative study ”, Social Enterprise Journal , Vol. 12 No. 1 , pp. 42 - 60 .
Kistruck , G.M. and Beamish , P.W. ( 2010 ), “ The interplay of form, structure, and embeddedness in social intrapreneurship ”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , Vol. 34 No. 4 , pp. 735 - 761 .
Ko , W.W. and Liu , G. ( 2015 ), “ Understanding the process of knowledge spillovers: the learning to become social enterprises ”, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal , Vol. 9 No. 3 , pp. 263 - 285 .
Kokko , S. ( 2018 ), “ Social entrepreneurship: creating social value when bridging holes ”, Social Enterprise Journal , DOI: TBC .
Kolk , A. and Rivera-Santos , M. ( 2018 ), “ The state of research on africa in business and management: insights from a systematic review of key international journals ”, Business and Society , Vol. 57 No. 3 , pp. 415 - 436 .
Korsgaard , S. ( 2011 ), “ Entrepreneurship as translation: understanding entrepreneurial opportunities through actor network theory ”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , Vol. 23 Nos 7/8 , pp. 661 - 680 .
Langdon , D. and Burkett , I. ( 2004 ), “ Defining social enterprise enterprising ways to address long-term unemployment ”, Book One: The New Mutualism Series , PI Productions , Palmwoods Queensland .
Lehner , O. ( 2014 ), “ The formation and interplay of social Capital in crowdfunded social ventures ”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , Vol. 26 Nos 5/6 , pp. 478 - 499 .
Leyden , D.P. , Link , A.N. and Siegel , D.S. ( 2014 ), “ A theoretical analysis of the role of social networks in entrepreneurship ”, Research Policy , Vol. 43 No. 7 , pp. 1157 - 1163 .
Lin , N. ( 1999 ), “ Building a network theory of social Capital ”, Connections , Vol. 22 No. 1 , pp. 28 - 51 .
Littlewood , D. and Holt , D. ( 2018 ), “ Social entrepreneurship in South Africa: exploring the influence of environment ”, Business and Society , Vol. 57 No. 3 , pp. 525 - 561 .
Littunen , H. ( 2000 ), “ Networks and local environmental characteristics in the survival of new firms ”, Small Business Economics , Vol. 15 No. 1 , pp. 59 - 71 .
Lundvall , B.-Å. ( 1992 ), National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , Pinter , London .
Lutz , D. ( 2009 ), “ African ubuntu philosophy and global management ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 84 No. S3 , pp. 313 - 328 .
Maclean , M. , Harvey , C. and Gordon , J. ( 2013 ), “ Social innovation, social entrepreneurship and the practice of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy ”, International Small Business Journal , Vol. 31 No. 7 , pp. 747 - 763 .
Mair , J. and Martí , I. ( 2006 ), “ Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction, and delight ”, Journal of World Business , Vol. 41 No. 1 , pp. 36 - 44 .
Meyskens , M. , Carsrud , A.L. and Cardozo , R.N. ( 2010 ), “ The symbiosis of entities in the social engagement network: the role of social ventures ”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , Vol. 22 No. 5 , pp. 425 - 455 .
Nahapiet , J. and Ghoshal , S. ( 1998 ), “ Social Capital, intellectual Capital, and the organizational advantage ”, Academy of Management Review , Vol. 23 No. 2 , pp. 242 - 266 .
Nicholls , A. ( 2010 ), “ Fairtrade in the UK: towards an economics of virtue? ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 92 No. S2 , pp. 241 - 255 .
O’Donnell , A. , Gilmore , A. , Cummins , D. and Carson , D. ( 2001 ), “ The network construct in entrepreneurship research: a review and critique ”, Management Decision , Vol. 39 No. 9 , p. 749 .
Ostgaard , T.A. and Birley , S. ( 1996 ), “ New venture growth and personal networks ”, Journal of Business Research , Vol. 36 No. 1 , pp. 37 - 50 .
Oxford Dictionaries ( 2018 ), “ English Oxford Living Dictionaries ”, available at: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/network (accessed 15 September 2018).
Petitgand , C. ( 2018 ), “ Business tools in nonprofit organizations: a performative story ”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research , Vol. 24 No. 3 , pp. 667 - 682 .
Portes , A. ( 1999 ), “ Social Capital: its origins and the application in modern sociology ”, Annual Review of Sociology , Vol. 24 No. 1 , pp. 1 - 24 .
Pret , T. and Carter , S. ( 2017 ), “ The importance of ‘fitting in’: collaboration and social value creation in response to community norms and expectations ”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , Vol. 29 Nos 7/8 , pp. 639 - 667 .
Putnam , R.D. ( 2000 ), Bowling Alone , Simon and Schuster . New York, NY .
Qureshi , I. , Kistruck , G. and Bhatt , B. ( 2016 ), “ The enabling and constraining effects of social ties in the process of institutional entrepreneurship ”, Organization Studies , Vol. 37 No. 3 , pp. 425 - 447 .
Richards , A. and Reed , J. ( 2015 ), “ Social capital’s role in the development of volunteer-led cooperatives ”, Social Enterprise Journal , Vol. 11 No. 1 , pp. 4 - 23 .
Rivera-Santos , M. , Holt , D. , Littlewood , D. and Kolk , A. ( 2015 ), “ Social entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan africa ”, Academy of Management Perspectives , Vol. 29 No. 1 , pp. 72 - 91 .
Roloff , J. ( 2008 ), “ Learning from multi-stakeholder networks: issue-focussed stakeholder management ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 82 No. 1 , pp. 233 - 250 .
Saebi , T. , Foss , N.J. and Linder , S. ( 2018 ), “ Social entrepreneurship research: past achievements and future promises ”, Journal of Management :, available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318793196
Sarasvathy , S.D. ( 2001 ), “ Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency ”, Academy of Management Review , Vol. 26 No. 2 , pp. 243 - 263 .
Scott , J.W. and Laine , J. ( 2012 ), “ Borderwork: Finnish-Russian co-operation and civil society engagement in the social economy of transformation ”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , Vol. 24 Nos 3/4 , pp. 181 - 197 .
Slimane , K.B. and Lamine , W. ( 2017 ), “ A transaction-based approach to social innovation ”, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation , Vol. 8 No. 4 , pp. 231 - 242 .
Slotte-Kock , S. and Coviello , N. ( 2010 ), “ Entrepreneurship research on network processes: a review and ways forward ”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , Vol. 34 No. 1 , pp. 31 - 57 .
Smallbone , D. , Evans , M. , Ekanem , I. and Butters , S. ( 2001 ), Researching Social Enterprise , Small Business Service , London, England .
Spiegler , A. and Halberstadt , J. ( 2018 ), “ Networks and the idea-fruition process of female social entrepreneurs in South Africa ”, Social Enterprise Journal , DOI: TBC .
Stephan , U. , Uhlaner , L.M. and Stride , C. ( 2015 ), “ Institutions and social entrepreneurship: the role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations ”, Journal of International Business Studies , Vol. 46 No. 3 , pp. 308 - 331 .
Steyaert , C. and Dey , P. ( 2010 ), “ Nine verbs to keep the social entrepreneurship research agenda ‘dangerous ”, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship , Vol. 1 No. 2 , pp. 231 - 254 .
Tasavori , M. , Kwong , C. and Pruthi , S. ( 2018 ), “ Resource bricolage and growth of product and market scope in social enterprises ”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , Vol. 30 Nos 3/4 , pp. 336 - 361 .
Thompson , J. and Doherty , B. ( 2006 ), “ The diverse world of social enterprise: a collection of social enterprise stories ”, International Journal of Social Economics , Vol. 33 , pp. 399 - 410 .
Todres , M. , Cornelius , N. , Janjuha‐Jivraj , S. and Woods , A. ( 2006 ), “ Developing emerging social enterprise through capacity building ”, Social Enterprise Journal , Vol. 2 No. 1 , pp. 61 - 72 .
Vestrum , I. ( 2014 ), “ The embedding process of community ventures: creating a music festival in a rural community ”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , Vol. 26 Nos 7/8 , pp. 619 - 644 .
Wasserman , S. and Faust , K. ( 1994 ), Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , Cambridge University Press , New York, NY .
Witt , P. ( 2004 ), “ Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups, entrepreneurship and regional development ”, Vol. 16 No. 5 , pp. 391 - 412 . (2004) .
Witt , P. , Schroeter , A. and Merz , C. ( 2008 ), “ Entrepreneurial resource acquisition via personal networks: an empirical study of german start-ups ”, The Service Industries Journal , Vol. 28 No. 7 , pp. 953 - 971 .
Peter , W. ( 2004 ), “ Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups ”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , Vol. 16 No. 5 , pp. 391 - 412 , doi: 10.1080/0898562042000188423 .
Chell , E. ( 2007 ), “ Social enterprise and entrepreneurship: towards a convergent theory of the entrepreneurial process ”, International Small Business Journal , Vol. 25 No. 1 , p. 526 .
Ghalwash , S. , Tolba , A. and Ismail , A. ( 2017 ), “ What motivates social entrepreneurs to start social ventures?: an exploratory study in the context of a developing economy ”, Social Enterprise Journal , Vol. 13 No. 3 , pp. 268 - 298 .
Granovetter , M. ( 1985 ), “ Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness ”, American Journal of Sociology , Vol. 91 No. 3 , pp. 481 - 510 .
Grohs , S. , Schneiders , K. and Heinze , R.G. ( 2017 ), “ Outsiders and intrapreneurs: the institutional embeddedness of social entrepreneurship in Germany ”, Voluntas , (2017) , Vol. 28 , pp. 25 - 69 .
Jenner , P. and Oprescu , F. ( 2016 ), “ The sectorial trust of social enterprise: friend or foe? ”, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship , Vol. 7 No. 2 , pp. 236 - 261 .
McKague , K. and Tinsley , S. ( 2012 ), “ Bangladesh’s rural sales program: towards a scalable rural sales agent model for distributing socially beneficial goods to the poor ”, Social Enterprise Journal , Vol. 8 No. 1 , pp. 6 - 30 .
Meyskens , M. and Carsrud , A. ( 2013 ), “ Nascent green-technology ventures: a study assessing the role of partnership diversity in firm success ”, Small Business Economics , Vol. 40 No. 3 , pp. 739 - 759 .
Ryzin , G.G.V. , Grossman , S. , DiPadova-Stocks , L. and Bergrud , E. ( 2009 ), “ Portrait of the social entrepreneur: statistical evidence from a US panel ”, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations , Vol. 20 No. 2 , pp. 129 - 140 .
Scheuerle , T. and Schmitz , B. ( 2016 ), “ Inhibiting factors of scaling up the impact of social entrepreneurial organizations a comprehensive framework and empirical results for Germany ”, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship , Vol. 7 No. 2 , pp. 127 - 161 .
Seanor , P. and Meaton , J. ( 2007 ), “ Making sense of social enterprise ”, Social Enterprise Journal , Vol. 3 No. 1 , pp. 90 - 100 .
Seanor , P. and Meaton , J. ( 2008 ), “ Learning from failure, ambiguity and trust in social enterprise ”, Social Enterprise Journal , Vol. 4 No. 1 , pp. 24 - 40 .
Smith , B. and Stevens , C.E. ( 2010 ), “ Different types of social entrepreneurship: the role of geography and embeddedness on the measurement and scaling of social value ”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , Vol. 22 No. 6 , pp. 575 - 598 .
Somerville , P. and McElwee , G. ( 2011 ), “ Situating community enterprise: a theoretical exploration ”, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development , Vol. 23 Nos 5/6 , pp. 317 - 330 .
Squazzoni , F. ( 2009 ), “ Social entrepreneurship and economic development in silicon valley: a case study on the joint venture: Silicon valley network ”, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly , Vol. 38 No. 5 , pp. 869 - 883 .
Tallontire , A. and Nelson , V. ( 2013 ), “ Fair trade narratives and political dynamics ”, Social Enterprise Journal , Vol. 9 No. 1 , pp. 28 - 52 .
Toivonen , T. ( 2016 ), “ What is the social innovation community? Conceptualizing an emergent collaborative organization ”, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship , Vol. 7 No. 1 , pp. 49 - 73 .
Žarković-Rakić , J. , Aleksić-Mirić , A. , Lebedinski , L. and Vladisavljević , M. ( 2017 ), “ Welfare state and social enterprise in transition: Evidence from serbia ”, VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations , Vol. 28 No. 6 , pp. 2423 - 2448 .
Related articles, all feedback is valuable.
Please share your general feedback
Contact Customer Support
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review existing literature on marketing in social enterprises (SEs). It identifies major trends and issues and highlights gaps in the existing knowledge base on social enterprise marketing (SEM). Design/methodology/approach Relevant articles on SEM were searched, following the PRISMA framework, in online databases using keywords and phrases like “marketing in social enterprises,” “marketing strategy/practice in social enterprises,” “social enterprise marketing” and “business practices in social enterprises.” After screening and checking for eligibility, 47 significant articles published in 21 peer-reviewed journals during 1995–2018 were selected for review. Findings The findings suggest that marketing in SEs has different issues and challenges when compared to marketing practices adopted by conventional business organizations. They are forced to address the varied expectations of the stakeholders in a resource-constrained situation, which creates problems for them. The review also highlights the fact that resource constraints, legacy mindset, and lack of marketing skills limit the impact of marketing practices in SEs. To address these issues, many social entrepreneurs survive through cost-effective marketing techniques. Originality/value To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first effort to identify and analyze extant literature in SEM. The resultant themes and research gaps highlight the current status of SEM literature. The paper can help SEs to understand and plan their marketing activities for better impact and profitability. Future research can draw on the findings of this review.
Purpose – This paper aims to provide a detailed analysis of the key capabilities needed for social enterprises to succeed in the context of extreme poverty. Facilitating growth and alleviating poverty in the world’s most impoverished regions requires introducing innovative solutions to achieve social impact while generating financial returns. Design/methodology/approach – This paper studies two social enterprises operating in Africa. Semi-structured interviewers were conducted with co-founders of the organizations. The transcribed interviews were analyzed through an open coding process, iterated to overarching categories, and compared between the organizations using a grounded theory approach. Secondary archival data and respondent validation were used to triangulate these findings. Findings – This paper proposes a model that highlights five key capabilities social enterprises need to tackle complex societal challenges while overcoming resource constraints and institutional voids. The processes followed to develop and deploy these capabilities are delineated, and the necessity of hybrid mechanisms that blend non-profit and private-sector approaches is shown as a key enabler for social enterprises to meet their dual objectives. Research limitations/implications – This research is limited to two cases studies from two different industries in Africa. Future research would refine and extend the proposed model to increase generalizability. Originality/value – This paper addresses a gap in the literature on understanding innovation and entrepreneurship in Africa, and it proposes a model for innovation derived from data. This paper also offers insights to the growing community of social entrepreneurs looking to develop sustainable solutions to societal challenges.
Purpose Despite the importance gained by social enterprises (SEs) and the increased number of social enterprise networks (SENs) in the UK, there is a paucity of research into the role of these networks in enhancing the sector and creating value. The purpose of this paper is to provide empirical evidence assessing this value. Design/methodology/approach The assessment and insights were derived through a concurrent mixed method data collection strategy with 241 responses from members of SEs in the UK. Findings In terms of frequency, the use of SENs is still sporadic, denoting an immature stage of network lifecycle development. Moreover, it was identified that usage was affected primarily by the perceived usefulness of the information available. The ultimate value created was primarily of an informative nature rather than knowledge exchange. Practical implications A framework is developed describing the structure, content and interaction dimensions of value of SENs. The understanding of this value offers opportunities to shape government interventions and current practices of SENs in assisting SEs and providing an active, knowledge sharing community. Originality/value By exploring the value perceived by social entrepreneurs of being part of an SEN, the paper considered an under-researched area of SE literature that can maximised the impact of the sector.
Purpose Social enterprise has the potential to serve as a mechanism of social and economic opportunity for persons experiencing homelessness. This paper aims to identify potential outcomes of work integration social enterprises (WISEs) for people who are homeless, at risk of homelessness, or transitioning out of homelessness. Design/methodology/approach Searches of 14 databases were completed using keywords and subject headings pertaining to homelessness, social enterprise and employment, respectively. These searches were then combined to identify literature concerning WISEs with homeless populations. The initial search yielded 784 unique articles. Through screening, 29 articles were selected and independently coded to establish themes. Findings The analysis identified the potential for WISEs to contribute positively to the lives of the target population in the areas of connection to the community, employment skill building, mental health, personal agency and empowerment, relationship-building, structure and time use, financial stability and housing. There were less positive and mixed findings regarding substance use, crime/delinquency, physical health and transition to mainstream employment. Future research should further explore causal relationships between WISE approaches and strategies and their potential implications for persons emerging from homelessness. Originality/value Prior to this research, there have not been any recent publications that synthesize the existing body of literature to evaluate the potential outcomes of WISE participation for homeless populations. This paper lays the groundwork for future empirical studies.
This chapter considers the pathways to becoming an artistic social entrepreneur. Previous research on social entrepreneurs has emphasized the impact of one's stock of human, social, and cultural capital on one's mobilization of requisite resources for launching and sustaining a social enterprise. Less sociological attention has been given to the influence of career-biographical factors, such as family, religion, education, and pivotal career turning points that may inspire and compel one to become a social entrepreneur and to envision and shape one's social enterprise, let alone an artistic social enterprise. The profiles of four artistic social entrepreneurs in this chapter illustrate how their strategic and risk orientations and career pathways shape the social enterprises they envision and influence their assumption and enactment of their roles as artist activists.
ABSTRACTSocial enterprises (SEs) primarily aim to create social value, that is, to generate benefits or reduce costs for society, while maintaining financial sustainability. Owing to their unique operating conditions and organizational characteristics, SEs face more severe resource challenges than their commercial counterparts. These challenges are exacerbated for SEs operating in emerging economies with complex social contexts. Overcoming these resource constraints and social challenges is vital for SEs to achieve their mission. Using an inductive multiple case-study approach, we identify a unique bricolage solution for achieving the dual objectives of SEs. Our findings suggest that identifying locally embedded village level entrepreneurs is a bricolage activity that social entrepreneurs leverage in the resource constrained environment of emerging economies, especially for the social enterprises that are active in the villages but were founded by social entrepreneurs who are not from these villages. This article therefore contributes to both social entrepreneurship literature as well as entrepreneurial bricolage literature and has important implications for future research and practice.
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyze the context, the concept and the main types of social enterprises in Rwanda, and to present its main institutional and contextual trajectories. Design/methodology/approachThe author carried out a literature review and interviews. Six categories were identified; each one is illustrated by one emblematic case. FindingsThe paper presents the evolution of economically oriented social organizations in Rwanda, mostly under the form of cooperatives and NGOs and with inspiration from traditional forms of mutual help. The context of emergence of social enterprise in Rwanda was shaped, among other factors, by Anglo-Saxon influence. Other factors include notably the aftermath of the 1994 genocide against Tutsi, the current governance prevailing in the country and the current entrepreneurships trends. The paper also underlines the absence of research on the subject in Rwanda. Six categories of social enterprises in Rwanda and their main features have been identified and analyzed, namely, NGOs, cooperatives, informal organizations, social entrepreneurs, public/private partnerships and companies carrying out social activities. Finally, the paper analyzes the institutional and contextual trajectories of social enterprise in Rwanda. Originality/valueThe paper explores and provides insights into the specificities and the current trends of social enterprise in Rwanda with a view to fostering further analysis for several research avenues.
Subject area Social Entrepreneurship. Study level/applicability This case study can be used on the module on introduction to social entrepreneurship for postgraduate students specializing in Social Entrepreneurship or Social Work. Case overview This case explores the difference between social entrepreneurship and idealism. It captures the journey of Charlene Vaz and Kavita Gonsalves, two passionate young women, who formed “The Bake Collective” (TBC). Kavita and Charlene are both full-time employees, who spend their weekends and evenings running TBC and through bake sells raise funds for supporting social causes. The women have been able to get a teacher hired for differently abled children, provide water purifiers to victims of the Nepal earthquake, furnish a classroom in a school for less privileged children and provide teaching material for schools in over 400 villages in the State of Maharashtra in India. The case highlights the power of volunteering for a cause that can result in developing a social enterprise. It helps to unfold the steps undertaken to kick-start the cause as well as the risks involved in the start-up stage. It also discusses the measures that can be taken to mitigate the risks in the start-up phase and the ways by which social entrepreneurs can scale and grow their programme. Expected learning outcomes From this case, students will learn about the factors that lead to the germination of a social enterprise and identify characteristics of social entrepreneurs. They will be able to understand critical factors required to sustain start-up enterprises. The case will also enable students to explore systems and processes that need to be designed to sustain the start-up phase. Further, the case will help students to brainstorm on growth strategies for social enterprises. Supplementary materials Teaching Notes are available for educators only. Please contact your library to gain login details or email [email protected] to request teaching notes. Subject code CSS 3: Entrepreneurship.
PurposeIdentify the drivers of social innovation (SI) that bring together the main management tools and approaches associated with the creation of SI in social enterprises (SEs).Design/methodology/approachA systematic review was developed in the Web of Science, Scopus and EBSCO databases, using the keywords: social innovation, social enterprise and management. After analysis of quality and application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 54 articles were selected for full analysis.FindingsSI process was systemised into four steps: mapping and development, consolidation, scaling up and evaluation. The drivers of SI were mapped and classified into three main factors: contextual, organisational and managerial.Practical implicationsIn organisational factors, business model was emphasised, as well as partnerships, participatory culture and intrapreneurship, adequate levels of bricolage and continuous learning. The management factors included the characteristics of the entrepreneur/innovator and managerial practices, where those that facilitate teamwork and the participation of all involved are best suited. In contextual factors, the highlight was the need for support from policy makers; community participation and demand for innovations that consider local context and usability.Originality/valueThis study connects previously scattered knowledge in a generic model of SI, highlighting routines and processes used, and provides a starting point for innovators and social entrepreneurs in the complex, uncertain and often unknown process of SI. Additionally, several research gaps were identified to be addressed by future research in the context of SI management.
Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the dimensions of inclusive and grassroots innovations operationalised by a social enterprise and the impact of these activities on urban regeneration. To this end, the case of Homebaked in Liverpool, UK, is presented and discussed. Design/methodology/approach Face-to-face interviews with members of Homebaked’s management, staff and volunteers were conducted; the interviews were complemented with on-site observations and review of archival information of the social enterprise. Findings The data gathered revealed the organisation’s involvement in both types of innovation as a means to achieve long-term urban regeneration related goals. For instance, innovative, strategic and human dimensions, together with the human dimension emerged as key ways of innovating. The impacts of innovative practices comprised encouraging inclusiveness among residents and non-residents, with approaches including hands-on training workshops, job and volunteering opportunities being predominant. Originality/value First, the study advances the theoretical and applied understanding of grassroots and inclusive innovation in the context of a social enterprise. For instance, an innovative/strategic and human dimension emerged as predominant ways in which grassroots and inclusive innovation elements were manifested. These dimensions were based on technology uptake, implementation of new product/service concepts or harnessing the skills of local and non-local individuals. Similarly, four dimensions associated with the impacts of these types of innovation were revealed. Second, the study addresses acknowledged gaps in the literature, particularly regarding the limited contributions illuminating processes and determinants of innovation among social enterprises.
Purpose This paper aims to explore the emergence and nature of impact investment in Australia and how it is shaping the development of the social enterprise sector. Design/methodology/approach Impact investment is an emerging approach to financing social enterprises that aims to achieve blended value by delivering both impact and financial returns. In seeking to deliver blended value, impact investment combines potentially conflicted logics from investment, philanthropy and government spending. This paper utilizes institutional theory as a lens to understand the nature of these competing logics in impact investment. The paper adopts a sequential exploratory mixed methods approach to study the emergence of impact investment in Australia. The mixed methods include 18 qualitative interviews with impact investors in the Australian market and a subsequent online questionnaire on characteristics of impact investment products, activity and performance. Findings The findings provide empirical evidence of the rapid growth in impact investment in Australia. The analysis reveals the nature of institutional complexity in impact investment and highlights the risk that the impact logic may become overshadowed by the investment logic if the difference in rigor around financial performance measurement and impact performance measurement is maintained. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for the development of the Australian social enterprise sector. Originality/value This paper provides empirical evidence on the emergence of impact investment in Australia and contributes to a growing global body of evidence about the nature, size and characteristics of impact investment.
Share document.
Social enterprise marketing: an analysis of selected cases in india, strategic marketing approaches impact on social enterprises, social enterprise marketing: review of literature and future research agenda, marketing scottish social enterprises using a label, analysis of green marketing for sustainability: evidence from select social enterprises in the philippines, marketing communications of latvian social enterprises from a consumer perspective, digital marketing and communication for social enterprises, do relational outcomes always generate willingness to pay for social enterprises’ products the moderating effect of sustainability orientation, finding the sweet spot between ethics and aesthetics: a social entrepreneurial perspective to sustainable fashion brand (juxta)positioning, paths to the development of social entrepreneurship in russia and central asian countries: standardization versus de-regulation, 94 references, marketing and social enterprises: implications for social marketing.
Marketing social missions—adopting social marketing for social entrepreneurship a conceptual analysis and case study, application of social marketing in social entrepreneurship, marketing amid the uncertainty of the social sector: do social entrepreneurs follow best marketing practices, social entrepreneurship and direct marketing, social enterprise dualities: implications for social marketing, marketing in the social enterprise context : is it entrepreneurial , defining the product in social marketing: an analysis of published research, social enterpriser and entrepreneurial marketing: myth or reality, related papers.
Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers
Abstract: purpose the purpose of this paper is to review existing literature on marketing in social enterprises (ses). it identifies major trends and issues and highlights gaps in the existing knowledge base on social enterprise marketing (sem). design/methodology/approach relevant articles on sem were searched, following the prisma framework, in online databases using keywords and phrases like “marketing in social enterprises,” “marketing strategy/practice in social enterprises,” “social enterprise marketing” and “bu… show more.
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
References 104 publication s, an empirical investigation and conceptual model of perceptions, support, and barriers to marketing in social enterprises in bangladesh.
Existing studies on social enterprises offer conflicting and contrasting perspectives on the impact of social enterprises on developing countries. Although several studies focused on social enterprises in developing countries, an empirical study that examines how social enterprises develop marketing strategies in an increasingly interconnected digital marketing environment is lacking. The current study empirically investigated the effects of consumer perceptions on social enterprises’ marketing strategies in a developing country and, in particular, the perceptions of, and barriers to, social enterprises in Bangladesh. Drawing on the technology–organisation–environment framework and a social constructionist perspective, 22 in-depth interviews were conducted with individuals from social enterprises. The emergent data were analysed using thematic analysis. The current study proposed an enabler and impediment social enterprise conceptual framework. The present study suggests that social enterprise engenders self-reliance and community empowerment, however, technological imbalance and infrastructures are the key impediments to adoption of effective social enterprise. Our analysis contributes to the theory of social enterprises’ marketing strategies and barriers, and suggests practical lessons in managing social enterprises and the development of marketing strategies
The management of marketing and communication strategies involves a complex mix of different requirements, particularly for social enterprises, which try to fulfill both social and business aims while operating in a resource‐constrained context. Although social enterprises are a rising phenomenon, the research on how these businesses communicate their activities remains in its infancy. This study builds on the theory of planned behavior and the source credibility theory, presenting a conceptual framework that distinguishes between high, moderate, and low credibility of a social enterprise's communication, to analyze its effects on potential customers' behavioral intentions. Through an online experiment with 260 subjects, the authors demonstrate that attitude toward a social enterprise, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and, ultimately, the intention to support a social enterprise by purchasing its products increases with the social enterprise's message credibility. The authors also present practical implications and avenues for future research on the communication of social enterprises based on the empirical findings.
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.
Discover the world's research
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Request PDF | Social enterprise marketing: review of literature and future research agenda | Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review existing literature on marketing in social enterprises ...
The review also highlights the fact that resource constraints, legacy mindset, and lack of marketing skills limit the impact of marketing practices in SEs. To address these issues, many social entrepreneurs survive through cost-effective marketing techniques.
Social enterprise marketing: review of literature and future research agenda
The resultant themes and research gaps highlight the current status of SEM literature. The paper can help SEs to understand and plan their marketing activities for better impact and profitability. Future research can draw on the findings of this review.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review existing literature on marketing in social enterprises (SEs). It identifies major trends and issues and highlights gaps in the existing knowledge base on social enterprise marketing (SEM). Design/methodology/approach Relevant articles on SEM were searched, following the PRISMA framework, in online databases using keywords and phrases like ...
Social enterprise marketing: review of literature and future research agenda Chinmoy Bandyopadhyay and Subhasis Ray Xavier Institute of Management, Xavier University, Bhubaneswar, India Abstract Purpose- The purpose ofthis paperis to reviewexistingliterature on marketingin socialenterprises (SEs).
The purpose of this paper is to review existing literature on marketing in social enterprises (SEs). It identifies major trends and issues and highlights gaps in the existing knowledge base on social enterprise marketing (SEM).
<jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review existing literature on marketing in social enterprises (SEs).
Social Entrepreneurship (SE) is a popular area of research and practice. An analysis of the existing literature reviews on SE reveals a dearth of studies classifying the existing SE literature into multiple research themes and further presenting popular and less popular research themes. With the aim of bridging this gap, this study presents a ...
The purpose of this paper is to critically and systematically review and assess the current status of research on practices through which social enterprise manage business relationships and to provide an organising framework for future scholarship. Adopting a systematic literature review approach, a total of 51 articles were reviewed.
Social enterprise (SE) studies are gaining ground as an emerging research domain owing to the duality characterizing their business models for tapping the triple bottom line (TBL) principle, which is a framework measuring the three pillars of sustainability: people, planet, and profit. This rising attention to SE has led to scattering in the ...
This is done through a systematic review of social enterprise and networks literature in business and management journals. Key trends and developments in this literature, and gaps and limitations, are identified, culminating in discussion of what next for social enterprise and networks research.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review existing literature on marketing in social enterprises (SEs). It identifies major trends and issues and highlights gaps in the existing knowledge base on social enterprise marketing (SEM). Design/methodology/approach Relevant articles on SEM were searched, following the PRISMA framework, in online ...
Our review of SE literature further highlights the need for future research to examine SE in resource-constrained environments, technological advancement and its impact on SE, the types of social enterprises and their outcomes, and various emerging topics in SE.
Social enterprise marketing: review of literature and future research agenda. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 38 (1), 121-135. doi:10.1108/mip-02-2019-0079
This review study also helps outline a set of future research directions, including studies examining (a) the process stage at the micro-level and macro-level, (b) linkages across levels and stages, (c) linkages across stages over time or longitudinal studies, (d) SE in resource-constrained environments, (e) technological advancement and its ...
The paper presents a compiled reference base and gives directions about future research and practice re-thinking social enterprise as a collaborative endeavor.
Abstract. Social Entrepreneurship (SE) is a popular area of research and practice. An analysis of the existing literature reviews on SE reveals a dearth of studies classifying the existing SE ...
This approach hinders a comprehensive understanding of the overall phenomenon. Against this background, we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) of 169 articles to develop a causal-chain framework based on inputs, contingency factors, and outputs to illustrate the interrelationships among different research constructs explored so far.
Social enterprise marketing: review of literature and future research agenda - Author: Chinmoy Bandyopadhyay, Subhasis Ray
Relevant publications (14 on social entrepreneurship, 40 on marketing in non-profit organizations and social enterprises and 41 papers on marketing) are selected and reviewed. The result of the literature analysis and synthesis show that social enterprises can gain from a more formal, systematic approach to marketing.
Mentioning: 25 - Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review existing literature on marketing in social enterprises (SEs). It identifies major trends and issues and highlights gaps in the existing knowledge base on social enterprise marketing (SEM). Design/methodology/approach Relevant articles on SEM were searched, following the PRISMA framework, in online databases using keywords and ...
The research concludes with a critical comparison and distillation of the research agendas proposed in the selected reviews; this process generates a meta-agenda for future research in social media marketing.
This review sheds light on understudied mobile app contexts like shopping apps, retail apps, and virtual shopping, allowing researchers to further explore these areas in their future research. However, this study does not cover the advances in mobile app domains comprehensively, as it combined CE and mobile app contexts.
Request PDF | Two decades of research on "masstige" marketing: A systematic literature review and future research agenda | In the 21st century, luxury marketing increasingly utilizes ...