peer graded assignment submit your portfolio project

Niyander Tech

Learn with fun

• All Coursera Quiz Answers

Peer-graded Assignment: Submit your portfolio project Solution

In this article i am gone to share HTML and CSS in depth by Meta Week 3 | Peer-graded Assignment: Submit your portfolio project Solution with you..

How to create and submit your assignment

• You need to develop your home page by creating an HTML file called index.html and a CSS file called style.css.
• You can develop these pages using VS Code on your local machine or in the UGL Project sandbox provided earlier in this lesson.
• The reading Setting up your local development environment provides the steps on how to set up VS Code on your computer if your choose to do so.

If you plan on using the UGL sandbox, your work will only be available during that session. Take note that the Project Sandbox only allows you to work for one hour at a time. Make sure you download your files before exiting the UGL. To work on your project again later, you can simply open the HTML and CSS files on your local machine and copy and paste the code again into the template files in the Project Sandbox. Remember to download the edited versions again at the end of the session.

To submit your project you need to download your files to your local machine by right-clicking on them in the Explorer panel and selecting “Download”.

Project Look Like

You will be required to submit your home page by uploading a zipped project folder that contains your HTML and CSS file. To learn more about how to zip and unzip folders visit the Mac or Windows support page.

Download this Zip File and Make Some Changes if you want and just upload it..

7 thoughts on “ Peer-graded Assignment: Submit your portfolio project Solution ”

Hello, I tried to download the links with the code but it does not work. Can you email it to me please? Thanks! [email protected]

Please Check your email , i send it

Please take a moment to review the updated link..

The page doesn’t exist, could you email those projects [email protected]

Hello, I tried to download the links with the code but it does not work. Could you email it to me please? ThankYou! [email protected]

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• GDPR Privacy Policy
• Privacy Policy
• Terms and Conditions

Greetings, Hey i am Niyander, and I hail from India, we strive to impart knowledge and offer assistance to those in need.

• COURSE OVERVIEW
• Lesson 1: Introduction to Portfolio
• Lesson 2: Introduction to Reflection
• Lesson 3: Using Technology
• Lesson 4: Instructional Technology
• Lesson 5: Your ITMA Portfolio
• Lesson 6: Your Professional Needs
• Lesson 7: Technology and IT to Meet Your Needs
• Lesson 8: IT in Your Professional Context

Lesson 9: Portfolio Peer Evaluation & Revision Process

• Lesson 10: Reflection on Past Practices
• Lesson 11: Reflection on Current Practices
• Lesson 12: Future Implications
• Lesson 13: Reflecting on Learning & Preliminary Review
• Lesson 14: Final Portfolio Submission
• ASSIGNMENTS
• AECT Standards

Peer and Self Evaluations

The itma evaluation process, the itma evaluation form, evaluation criteria, submitting your portfolio for the peer evaluation activity, your plan for revision, activity: your plan for revision, submitting your plan.

It's time to return to our portfolios. Before your portfolio can be reviewed by your peers, it needs to be a step closer to completion. As noted in Lessons 6, 7, and 8, you should have been searching for and adding the items listed as optional in Lesson 5. This includes artifacts that fit the definition of the task, a brief description of each artifact that explains what you learned about the task or subtask while completing the work in the artifact, the resources you used in the program and found especially valuable, and your resume. No task reflective statements are to be part of your portfolio for this submission. This lesson reviews the ITMA portfolio evaluation process and the evaluation criteria, and provides instructions for the Plan for Revisions for your portfolio. After the peer evaluation, you will have time make any necessary revisions before submitting your portfolio to the committee for final faculty review. Please note that our faculty review of student portfolios is the "final exam" for this master's program.

The purpose for this evaluation is to point out areas that need to be addressed before it is ready to submit for the Preliminary Review. The ITMA portfolio evaluation process is two-fold.  First, you will evaluate the portfolios of at least two peers.   Second, you will evaluate your own portfolio.  Before you can begin to evaluate portfolios, you must submit your portfolio into the online Peer Review Evaluation Interface (PEI).  Your submission into the PEI places you in a group of peers.  Instructions for submitting your portfolio are listed later in this lesson.

The Peer Evaluation Interface contains the form to be used for both the self and peer evaluations. To evaluate a portfolio, login to the Peer Review Evaluation Interface, select the course, then the option. When you want to evaluate a peer’s portfolio, simply click the radio button for the student. The evaluation form will open in the browser and the peer’s portfolio will open in a new browser window. Once you have both items available you are ready to begin the evaluation. It may be helpful to print out a copy of the evaluation form to use when performing the evaluation, and then transcribe your results back to the web form when you are finished.

The evaluation form has two sections. The first section of the form relates to the individual portfolio tasks, and asks you to rate each task page based on five criteria: Navigation, Functionality, Relevance, Content, and Appearance. Select one radio button next to each of the criterion according to how well you feel the portfolio meets that criterion, with 1 being a low score (does not meet the criterion) and 5 being a high score (meets or exceeds the criterion). You can select only one radio button on the each line. In addition, there is a space for you to enter comments next to each of the criterion. To add comments click your mouse on the appropriate comments box and start typing. These comments are very important, as they will provide important feedback for the creator of the portfolio. Don't worry if your comments exceed one line - it will just wrap to the next line.

The second section of the form concerns the portfolio as a whole. After you have evaluated each of the task pages, you will then rate the overall portfolio on the same criteria used for each task page. Again, please make use of the "Comments" fields to provide feedback.

We anticipate your comments will adhere to the highest standards of professional communication practices, as we are a community of learners. In other words, be fair honest, and be respectful in your review process; be constructive in your criticism, and, be timely in your completion of the activity. Your feedback will be essential to other students as they progress through the revision process. If you give a low score in a particular area, be sure to use the "Comments" field to elaborate as to why you did so. Just giving a score, whether low or high, will not provide a student with enough effective feedback to make the required changes; your accompanying comments are essential.

Please note that this evaluation form is nearly identical to the one the faculty will use when they evaluate your portfolio.  Comments that are constructive, objective, and provide details are expected from an evaluation process.  Evaluation comments that are repeated, lack details, or are missing entirely provide little information to your peers.   What questions come to mind as you are reviewing the portfolio?  Which elements seem to be missing or lacking depth?  Which elements were done well?

Finally, timeliness is critical for this activity. It is very important that you submit your portfolio and complete your evaluations by the due date s advertised in the Course Overview document, or sooner. Other students will be depending on the feedback you provide in order to create their plan for revision. Please refer to the "Course Overview" document for the semester's assignment due dates. If you encounter problems with the interface, the peer’s portfolio, or the assignment due dates, please contact the facilitator for the course.

As you are evaluating your peers’ portfolios, the facilitator for the course may also be conducting an expert evaluation. He or she will be able to view your portfolio from a different perspective, providing you with additional valuable information and comments. This process will help you prepare your portfolio for the final faculty review.

• Looking at the home page, is the main menu easy to understand?
• Are there links to each of the portfolio pages?
• Is it obvious which links lead to which portfolio page? It should be easy for you to determine how to get where you need to go, and also obvious where each link goes. This means that each link should adequately describe the page to which it leads.
• Do all of the links work? 
• Do the links from each page lead to the proper place?
• Do the links work from your computer? 
• Do the links work with the browser you use most often?  We recommend the Firefox browser, but you may use another.
• Is there enough content to address each task?
• Are there tasks or subtasks without artifacts?
• Are artifacts included from the author's professional work?
• Are there any recommendations regarding content that you would like to offer?
• Is everything spelled correctly?
• Is correct grammar used?
• Is your name found easily throughout the portfolio?
• Is the name of the task found easily on the page?
• Does the homepage contain the author's name, photo, and contact information, at a minimum?

Functionality

• Can you see what the author expected you to see?
• Can you read all of the text? Is it easy to read?
• Is there content that requires a certain plug-in (QuickTime, Acrobat, etc.)? Is a link to the plug-in included? Is this clearly noted on the page?
• Does all content load properly?
• Does everything function in the browser you use most often?
• Does everything function on your computer and monitor?
• Are page titles included?
• Did the author create his/her own definitions of each task? Do they make sense?
• Based on the definitions provided by AECT, does the definition fit the task?
• Is the content relevant to the task? Do the artifacts fit the definition of the task?
• Are the subtasks correct for the task or are they for another one?
• In your opinion, do the artifacts fit the definition of the sub-task provided by the author?
• Are there any artifacts that you question…that you would like to know why the author placed them there? Be sure to include these types of questions in your evaluation comments.
• Does the description of the artifact help you understand why the author associated them with the task? If not, be sure to ask in your comments.
• Are the page titles relevant? This page title is the information that appears at the top of the browser window.
• Is the "look and feel" of the portfolio appropriate for a professional portfolio? Does the appearance distract from the content?
• Is there too much white space on the page?
• Is the page cluttered?
• Could a better color combination be helpful to the reader?
• Is the layout attractive? Is it consistent on all pages?
• Are the menus found easily?
• Are the graphics appropriate for the content? Are they of an appropriate size for the layout?
• Do the graphics take too long to load? Are there too many?
• Is the font face and style appropriate for a professional portfolio? Is it consistent throughout the portfolio?
• Does your background distract from the content? Does it make the text difficult to read?

Overall Evaluation

In the end, when you are finished browsing through a portfolio, ask yourself the following questions:

• Is it easy to navigate to each portfolio task?
• Is it easy to find the pertinent information relating to each task?
• Does the information load properly?
• Is the information legible?
• Is it obvious how and why the artifact fits in with each task?
• Is it easy to move to another task?
• Is the design of the site distracting in any way?
• Is it easy to contact the creator of the portfolio?

Step 1: Upload your portfolio

Submit the URL of the home page for your IDT Portfolio into the Peer Review Evaluation Interface (see Step 2) as well as into the assignment submission interface (see Step 3).

Step 2: Submit your portfolio for evaluations:

Use the link to the Peer Review Evaluation Interface listed below.  Log-in with your ITMA username and its password.  On the next page, select the course, the lesson, then “Submit Project to be Evaluated”.   When you submit your portfolio, the interface will place you in a group of three or four.   Use the link below to log into the Peer Evaluation Interface.  After logging-in, select the course, the lesson, then “Submit Project to be Evaluated”.

Link to Peer Review Evaluation Interface

Step 3: Submit your portfolio for grading:

The URL for your portfolio homepage must also be submitted into the online submission form so that we can grade your evaluations and review your portfolio. This submission should be done when you submit your portfolio for evaluation.

Just as the development of instruction begins with a design plan, a good revision process begins with a plan.  In this lesson, you are asked to describe your plan for the revisions needed to your portfolio.

Your plan is comprised of two parts.  In the first part, summarize the evaluation comments from your peers and your self-evaluation.  Your summary should cover each of the five evaluation criteria – navigation, functionality, relevance, content, and appearance.  It should include the strengths and weaknesses identified in the evaluation comments.

In the second part, describe the actions you will take to revise the things that need to be changed.  How will you change the appearance?  How will you include a large artifact?  How will you be sure that your reflection is adequate?  While a bulleted list may be the best method to guide you as you revise your portfolio, it does not allow you to elaborate as you describe the strengths, weaknesses, and revisions for your portfolio.

You may have evaluation comments from the course facilitator at this time.  You may include them in your plan, however it is not required.

In the end, step back from your portfolio and ask yourself the following:

• Does my portfolio showcase me and my new skills?
• Have I included a definition for each task and sub-task?
• Does my portfolio include a reflection (i.e., commentary) for each task that demonstrates careful thought, a self-assessment of changes in your abilities, critical thinking skills regarding the artifact and its impact on your learning, the impact this artifact may have on future events, and any growth in your learning?
• Will an outside user be able to navigate easily to each portfolio task?
• Will they be able to find the pertinent information relating to each task?
• Will this information load properly?
• Will this information be legible?
• Will it be obvious as to how and why this information fits in with that task?
• Will it then be easy to move to another task?
• Will they be hindered by the design of your site?
• Will they be able to contact you easily to ask questions?

If you can answer yes to each of these questions then your portfolio should be in good shape.

• Add a link to your revision plan to the Reflection page of your portfolio and save the page.
• Your name, email address, date, and title of the assignment.
• The link to your revision plan.

• Upload the document from Step 3 into the student interface.

Your plan for revision should be created in Microsoft Word. At the top of the paper include your name, email address, date, and the title of the assignment. Name the file "revision.doc". When you have completed your plan create a link to this file from the "Reflections" page of your electronic portfolio. Be sure to include an appropriate heading and a short description of what the link is, so that it is easy to find. Then, upload the Microsoft Word document and your revised "Reflections" page to your portfolio folder.

When you have finished uploading your files, proceed to the online submission form . Submit the URL for your portfolio’s Reflection page into the online submission form, rather than the URL for the Microsoft Word document. Your plan should be completed and submitted by the listed due date.

Points : 50

Grading Criteria:

• Peer evaluations are completed on time (8)
• Peer evaluation points are consistent with comments and overall quality of portfolio (7)
• Peer evaluation includes thoughtful evaluations - good notes, constructive criticism ( 10 )
• Revision plan includes summary of strengths and weaknesses ( 8 )
• Revision plan covers all five criteria - Navigation, Functionality, Relevance, Content, and Appearance ( 7 )
• Revision plan describes revisions to be made (10)

Help Articles

Submit peer reviewed assignments, learner help center nov 29, 2023 • knowledge, article details.

When you submit a peer-reviewed assignment, other learners in the course will review your work and submit feedback . 

You'll also need to give feedback to other learners. Your grade might be affected if you don't give feedback.

If you're having trouble with a peer reviewed assignment, check our troubleshooting page .

Steps to submit

To submit a peer reviewed assignment:

• Open the course you want to submit an assignment for.
• Click the Grades tab.
• Choose the assignment you want to submit work for.
• Read the instructions, then click My submission to submit your assignment.
• To save a draft of your assignment, click Save draft .
• To see what your saved assignment will look like when you submit it, click Preview .
• Before you submit, ensure the assignment is above the minimum word count. The default minimum is five words, but a course may have a unique minimum set.
• To make changes to your saved assignment, click Edit .
• To submit your assignment for peer review, click Submit for review .

By submitting a peer reviewed assignment, you confirm that you understand and will follow our privacy policies about peer reviewed work.

When will I receive feedback from my peers?

You'll receive a grade on your assignment within 7-10 days, as long as you've received at least one peer review.

When you get feedback, you may see the name of the learner who gave it. If your instructor has anonymous feedback turned on, you’ll see a notice at the top of the feedback for the assignment.

I can’t submit my assignment

If you can’t submit your assignment, make sure that your answers are all over the minimum word limit.

You may not be able to submit your assignment if your answers are too similar to another learner’s submission. Please keep in mind that plagiarism is against the Coursera Honor Code. 

If you see a notification letting you know that your assignment answers are similar to another learner’s submission, you’ll need to update your response before submitting. 

Once you’ve updated your answers with original work, the Submit for review button will appear.

If you need more time to work on your assignment, you can click Save draft and come back to it later.

If you think you shouldn’t be seeing this error, you can click the link below the notification to let us know. You’ll be able to submit your assignment after you edit your answers.

If you aren’t seeing any error messages, but are still not able to submit your assignment, try these troubleshooting steps.

Back to top

Attempt limits

Some private courses (such as courses in a Degree or MasterTrack program) may have a limit on how many times you can submit a peer-reviewed assignment.

If there's an attempt limit for your assignment, you'll see an 'Attempts' section listed near the top of the page when you open the assignment.

If you meet the attempt limit and need help with your grade, you can reach out to your program support team. You can find your dedicated support email address in the onboarding course for your program.

Save your work as a draft

If you want to start working on an assignment but you don't want to submit it yet, you can save it as a draft. When you save an assignment as a draft:

• You can work on your saved draft from any computer or device if you log in with your Coursera account.
• No one will be able to see or review your work until you submit it.
• You can save a draft as many times as you want before submitting it.

To save an assignment as a draft, click  Save draft when you're working on it.

Related Articles

• Number of Views 216.52K
• Number of Views 60.57K
• Number of Views 280.08K
• Number of Views 187.59K
• Number of Views 117.85K

© 2021 Coursera Inc. All rights reserved.

Sauce & Spoon: Tips for Your Google Capstone course

This blog is reader-supported. When you purchase something through an affiliate link on this site, I may earn some coffee money. Thanks! Learn more .

I’ve been managing projects for over 20 years and I found the Google Project Management Certificate capstone course quite tricky. It’s hard to know what they are looking for in the Sauce & Spoon case study, so if you’re working through the course, here are some tips as you prepare to submit your capstone assignments.

For more general tips on how to earn the Google project management certificate quickly, read the story of how I passed the certificate in a week .

A solid, professional, well-recognized project management course from a great training provider. Perfect for beginners and people interested in learning more about project management as a career.

Applying Project Management in the Real World capstone: overview

The premise of the capstone is that you work through a realistic project scenario, responding to data as it unfolds. The assignment is peer-assessed and graded based on project documentation you submit.

Sauce & Spoon is a restaurant chain that wants to expand. They are launching new menus on the tablets on each table, with the goal of making it easier for guests to order and speeding up the time it takes to get the food out.

There are multiple stakeholders involved from the senior executives to the kitchen staff, front of hours and the IT team.

You’re acting in the project management role, guiding the project through the lifecycle to completion.

It’s not an agile project management case study but I can tell you that it’s realistic. I have never worked on a project where it’s been so easy to elicit requirements and to get information out of stakeholders, but apart from that, it’s realistic! I’ve reviewed the Google Project Management course overall, and generally the content is a good representation of your average, straightforward project.  

Tip: Go back to your documentation for Office Green/Plant Pals and use those as inspiration for the Sauce & Spoon documentation as the templates are the same.

Sauce & Spoon project charter

The information you need for the summary and project goals is dotted throughout the case study material. The charter is the first document you create (as we’re in the project initiation phase), so there isn’t that much information to sift through.

I think it’s important that you do your own work and extract the deliverables, project scope, benefits and costs from the case study materials, but I will share my project summary and appendix. Don’t copy it (Coursera asks you to validate that it is your own work and if they find out you are a copyright thief, they’ll kick you out).

Project summary

This project aims to implement a guest-facing digital menu and point of sale system at two restaurant locations, North and Downtown by Q2. This will include a pilot in the bar area of a tablet system integrated into each table to allow guests to order from their tables and to improve the ticketing system into the kitchen. This will reduce the time it takes for customers to receive their orders.

I added a few bullet points to the appendix box.

• Should we add a goal around decreasing guest wait time? The tablets will reduce table turn time but other factors might influence how busy the restaurant is. 

Resolved: We agreed to exclude this goal as the table turn time goal is more specific.

• Should we reallocate some of the payroll? The tablets will allow servers to cover more tables and that would free up funding to increase the number of kitchen staff (line cooks, bussers and runners). Not yet resolved; next steps: Continue to discuss
• Order return policy: As a result of the data collected by the tablets, we will be able to evidence to customers what they ordered and this should reduce returns and comped food. Resolved; agreement reached. This will be managed outside of the project and will be picked up by operations.
• Should we extend rollout to include all table sections, not just the bar? This has been requested by Omar. Not yet resolved; next steps: Peta to organise a meeting.

I should add that I have never included an appendix like this in a real project charter. The content here would be included in my RAID decision log , or in an action log if they are not yet resolved.

Drafting influential emails

Who is to say what makes an email influential? The second Week 1 peer-reviewed activity is to create an email coalition for the Sauce & Spoon team, writing “influential emails” so you can sway decision-making.

This is hard to do without knowing the individuals, and while Peta the project manager (i.e. you) does have some background information on the personalities to work with, it’s not a lot. You should also have completed a stakeholder analysis document this week, so that helps too.

The task is made harder as there is no right or wrong answer: you have to draft your message in your own words. Remember to check the marking schema so you can hit all the points. Submit your emails in a Google Doc with the settings set to public so anyone can read it – otherwise you risk your peer reviewer not being able to give your project documents any marks at all.

Below, you can see my assignment as an example. I’ve blurred some of the text as encouragement for you to use your own words and not copy my work!

Sauce & Spoon project plan (Excel/Sheets)

Moving on to project planning.

The good thing about the whole Google project management certificate is that you aren’t expected to use any particular project management software . All the templates provided are either Google Docs/Google Sheets or Microsoft Word and Excel, so it’s very straightforward to complete the assignments with tools you already have.

Use the Sheets template to create the task list based on the tasks you’ve identified. Next, fill in the time estimates for project tasks. I saved time by not completing the Gantt chart boxes on the right, but in real life you would do that.

Save more time by not completing aspects you are not graded on, for example, the task owners. You can see in my assignment below that I did not complete that. Again, in real life you would. Equally, if you are using this assignment as evidence to recruiters that you can create a project plan , you’d be better off completing the whole thing to show them that you can!

You can see the task groupings and milestones I used in the image below.

In Week 3 you will add quality standards, evaluation questions and survey questions to the plan and submit it again.

Evaluation findings

I enjoyed this assignment, which is about creating a short slide deck that summarizes the evaluation findings from the test launch event. I really do prefer PowerPoint for creating slides, but I used the Google Slides template because it was right there and it was easier to submit Google doc links.

Whether you go with PowerPoint or Google Slides, you’ll need these slides:

• Overview of what was evaluated during the test launch (make a list of bullet points)
• Findings: Pick one element of the results to present as a graph. I chose to do the question: “Did the kitchen prepare your order correctly?”
• Next steps: Lead with the headline. I chose to focus in on the fact we only served the correct order in 72% of cases, which is a long way from the target. Summarize the next steps to tackle the problem in bullet point form.

I added another Next Steps slide to summarize another major takeaway: only 56% of diners receive their order within 20 minutes. I described how the working groups would be set up to address this.

That’s it! You really don’t need loads of words on each slide.

Email to senior stakeholder

In Week 4 there are two peer-reviewed assignments to do. The first is writing an email to a senior stakeholder, Deanna.

I found the assignments where the answer was one thing or another (like a time estimate) easier to do than drafting narrative text. It is also harder to mark and more subjective, but do check the rubric for each assignment so you can see how you will be assessed.

You can see some of the email I drafted for the assignment below, as a starting point for your own work.

Close out report and exec summary

The Sauce & Spoon close out report was quite time-consuming to do, but worth it as it provides the input to the exec summary for the project impact report.

You don’t have to write the whole impact report, just the executive summary, and that’s a good skill to get into the habit of.

Here’s how I completed my executive summary.

Vision: one sentence on the goals of the project.

Key results: I wrote one sentence on the increase in customer satisfaction, using specific numbers and data from the case study.

Revenue impact: I added a sentence on the revenue increase, using data from the case study.

Lessons learned: two sentences on lessons learned .

Next steps: The final sentence summarized the two main next steps.

Tips for submitting your work

I kept a Word document with my study notes that included links to all my Google docs relevant to the capstone so I knew what I had submitted and could find my files again.

Make sure any Google docs submitted can be viewed by the public or people with the link, otherwise you’ll score zero as your peer reviewer won’t be able to see your work.

Make sure you submit the right file for the right assignment!

Don’t submit random files – I had a few to grade that were files not even relevant to the case study, such as someone’s CV. Zero points for that.

Don’t submit the link to the blank template! You’ll get a zero if there’s nothing in the file to mark.

Yes, you can search online for the answers to the assessed quizzes — the course has been around long enough now for people to have scraped the questions and answers — but you aren’t learning anything from that. Why cheat? That’s truly not going to help you get a job or keep a job.

Completing non-assessed work

There are other tasks to complete, and if you are new to project management I would encourage you to complete all the work. Build your confidence so you know what is expected of a project manager in a real job, and take your time to get familiar with the jargon , tools and documentation.

However, if you already have some project management experience and are not trying to build new skills, you can skip the other activities and only focus on the peer-reviewed content. That’s your risk though: sometimes there are nuggets of information relevant for assignments hidden in the other task descriptions and notes so you’ll potentially miss important information. Just like in real life if you skip over a few important emails!

However thorough this case study, it’s only that: a desk-based exercise. It’s helpful, relevant experience, but until you start talking to humans and working with stakeholders, your experience is going to remain theoretical.

Still, it’s going to give you something to talk about during your job search and I really rate the Google course as project management training for beginners.

Good luck with your capstone completion!

Project manager, author, mentor

Elizabeth Harrin is a Fellow of the Association for Project Management in the UK. She holds degrees from the University of York and Roehampton University, and several project management certifications including APM PMQ. She first took her PRINCE2 Practitioner exam in 2004 and has worked extensively in project delivery for over 20 years. Elizabeth is also the founder of the Project Management Rebels community, a mentoring group for professionals. She's written several books for project managers including Managing Multiple Projects .

Navigation Menu

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests..., provide feedback.

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly.

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation .

peer-graded-assignment

Here are 6 public repositories matching this topic..., akash-goyal-github / coursera_user_experience_course.

Introduction to User Experience Principles and Processes by University of Michigan:100::boom:

• Updated Apr 9, 2020

i-asimkhan / google-project-managment-specialization

This repository lists the material of project managment courses of Google Project Managment Specialization.

• Updated Sep 8, 2022

marmello77 / FARS

Coursera's Peer-graded Assignment: Building an R Package.

• Updated Nov 4, 2020

honlimwong / final-project-html5

• Updated Dec 7, 2021

Dhanush-S-Gowda / module2-solution

Welcome to Module 2 Peer-graded Assignment for the "HTML CSS and JavaScript" course offered by Johns Hopkins University on Coursera.

• Updated Jan 28, 2024

Yashmenaria1 / IBM-AI-ENGINEERING-COURSERA

PEER GRADED AND GRADED ASSIGNMENT

• Updated Nov 4, 2023
• Jupyter Notebook

Improve this page

Add a description, image, and links to the peer-graded-assignment topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.

Curate this topic

Add this topic to your repo

To associate your repository with the peer-graded-assignment topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."