movie review in 300 words

Movie Reviews

Tv/streaming, collections, great movies, chaz's journal, contributors, avengers: endgame.

Now streaming on:

“Avengers: Endgame” is the culmination of a decade of blockbuster filmmaking, the result of years of work from thousands of people. It is designed to be the most blockbuster of all the blockbusters, a movie with a dozen subplots colliding, and familiar faces from over 20 other movies. It’s really like nothing that Hollywood has produced before, existing not just to acknowledge or exploit the fans of this series, but to reward their love, patience, and undying adoration. The blunt thing you probably want to know most: It’s hard to see serious MCU fans walking away from this disappointed. It checks all the boxes, even ticking off a few ones that fans won’t expect to be on the list. It’s a satisfying end to a chapter of blockbuster history that will be hard to top for pure spectacle. In terms of sheer entertainment value, it’s on the higher end of the MCU, a film that elevates its most iconic heroes to the legendary status they deserve and provides a few legitimate thrills along the way.

Don’t worry: I will stay very spoiler-free. The main joy of this film is in how its incredibly complex narrative unfolds, and you can go elsewhere if you want that ruined. The disappointing “ Avengers: Infinity War ” ended with Thanos finally getting all of the six Infinity Stones he so desperately sought, and then using them to wipe out half of existence, including beloved heroes like Black Panther, Star-Lord, and Spider-Man. “Avengers: Endgame” picks up a few weeks after “The Snap,” as the remaining heroes try to pick up the pieces and figure out if there’s a way to reverse Thanos’ destruction.

Immediately, “ Endgame ” is a more focused piece than “Infinity War” by virtue of having a tighter, smaller cast. (Thanks, Thanos.) It’s a more patient, focused film, even as its plot draws in elements of a dozen other movies. Whereas “ Infinity ” often felt bloated, “Endgame” allows some of the more iconic characters in the history of the MCU a chance to be, well, heroic. No longer mere pawns in a Thanos-driven plot, Iron Man, Captain America, Black Widow, Hulk, and Thor break free of the crowd, ably assisted by Hawkeye and Ant-Man. In a sense, this is the new Avengers, and the tighter group of superheroes reminded me of the charm of Joss Whedon ’s first "Avengers" movie, one in which strong personalities were allowed to bounce off each other instead of just feeling like they were strapped into a rollercoaster headed in the same direction. It also allows space for some of the best acting work in the franchise, particularly from Chris Evans and Robert Downey Jr., who one realizes while watching this have turned Captain America and Iron Man into something larger than life for a generation. The most satisfying aspect of “Endgame” is in how much it provides the MCU’s two most popular heroes the story arc they deserve instead of just drowning them in a sea of cameos by lesser characters from other movies. In the way it canonizes them, it becomes an ode to the entire Marvel Cinematic Universe.

What works best about Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely ’s script for “Endgame” is that one feels, for arguably the first time, a sense of looking back instead of merely trying to set the table for something to come. This film incorporates elements of what fans know and love about the MCU, recalling character beats, origins, and the plots of movies like “ Iron Man ,” “ Guardians of the Galaxy ,” and “ Captain America: The First Avenger .” Call it cheap fan service, but one of my biggest issues with these films, especially “Infinity War,” has been a sense that they’re merely commercials for movies yet to be made. “Endgame” doesn’t have that. Sure, the MCU will go on, but this movie has a finality and depth given to it by MCU history that the others have lacked.      

Of course, it needs to work as just a movie too. The middle hour is as purely enjoyable as the MCU has ever been, but there are times when I wished I could sense a human touch below the incredibly-polished, carefully-planned surface of “Avengers: Endgame.” In the long build-up first hour, I longed for one of the pregnant pauses about the seriousness of the situation to lead to something that felt spontaneous or an acting decision that didn’t feel like it had been run through a committee. Every single aspect of “Endgame” has been foreshadowed for years by other films and finely tuned by the hundreds of people it takes to make a movie like this one. The result is a film that often feels more like a product than a piece of art. Roger Ebert once famously wrote that “video games can never be art,” but he may have been surprised to see art becoming more like a video game, something remarkably programmed and determined, lacking anything that really challenges the viewer.

However, people aren't lining up at dawn for “Avengers: Endgame” to challenge them. It’s really about rewarding commitment, fandom, and expectations. Whatever its flaws, “Endgame” does all of that, and with a sincere admiration for the fans who have made this universe a true cultural phenomenon. The stakes are high and the conclusions actually feel resonant. It’s an epic cultural event, the kind of thing that transcends traditional film criticism to become a shared experience with fans around the world. The biggest question I had coming out was how they could possibly top it ten years from now. 

Brian Tallerico

Brian Tallerico is the Managing Editor of RogerEbert.com, and also covers television, film, Blu-ray, and video games. He is also a writer for Vulture, The Playlist, The New York Times, and GQ, and the President of the Chicago Film Critics Association.

Now playing

Asphalt City

Glenn kenny.

Veselka: The Rainbow on the Corner at the Center of the World

Dusk for a Hitman

Robert daniels.

Peyton Robinson

Kaiya Shunyata

Film credits.

Avengers: Endgame (2019)

Rated PG-13 for sequences of sci-fi violence and action, and some language.

181 minutes

Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark / Iron Man

Chris Evans as Steve Rogers / Captain America

Mark Ruffalo as Bruce Banner / The Hulk

Chris Hemsworth as Thor Odinson

Scarlett Johansson as Natasha Romanoff / Black Widow

Jeremy Renner as Clint Barton / Ronin / Hawkeye

Don Cheadle as James "Rhody" Rhodes / War Machine

Paul Rudd as Scott Lang / Ant-Man

Brie Larson as Carol Danvers / Captain Marvel

Karen Gillan as Nebula

Bradley Cooper as Rocket Racoon (voice)

Gwyneth Paltrow as Virginia "Pepper" Potts / Rescue

Josh Brolin as Thanos

Zoe Saldana as Gamora

Stan Lee as Stan Lee

• Anthony Russo
• Christopher Markus
• Stephen McFeely
• Jim Starlin

Cinematographer

• Trent Opaloch
• Jeffrey Ford
• Matthew Schmidt
• Alan Silvestri

Latest blog posts

Sonic the Hedgehog Franchise Moves to Streaming with Entertaining Knuckles

San Francisco Silent Film Festival Highlights Unearthed Treasures of Film History

Ebertfest Film Festival Over the Years

The 2024 Chicago Palestine Film Festival Highlights

“300” by ‎Zack Snyder Film Analysis Essay (Movie Review)

Initial impression, emphasis on masculinity and physical perfection, examining the film within the context of american cinema, my views on the movie.

The movie “300” is a retelling of the Battle of Thermopylae where King Leonidas fought against the incursion of the Persian army into Greece.

I have to stay that the movie was incredibly impressive since, from a cinematography standpoint, it was unique due to the manner in which the locations, characters and weapons had a “faded” and historic feel to them. It was as if I was really looking back into the past and viewing all the events that lead up to the great battle where Leonidas and his army of 300 Spartan warriors lost their lives.

There was a definite emphasis on masculinity within the film where the various warriors were shown in nothing more than leather briefs while holding weapons that were made of bronze. This of course contrasts with general common sense since during the time when ancient Sparta was in existence, its warriors did in fact wear substantially more protection that the skin on their backs. It is based on this that when viewing the movie, it is obvious that the director wanted to depict the “manliness” and bravado of the Spartans. This was intended to build upon the historical knowledge that Spartan warriors were not only strong but resolute when it came to their dedication towards war.

The warrior culture of the Spartan state was emphasized not only in the scenes depicting their military and governmental infrastructure but also in the way in which they placed a considerable amount of importance on physical strength and health. The scene where the Spartan babies that were deemed as “unworthy” and were thus thrown off the cliff showcases just how far the Spartan culture was willing to take their concept of physical perfection to its utmost limits.

It is undeniable that American cinema places a considerable amount of focus on action, adventure, violence, battles and destruction. The movie “300” is merely another iteration of this proclivity towards developing action films. In fact, it can even be stated that Hollywood tends to take such a behavior a bit too far. This can be seen in the movie “Noah” where a bible story was subsequently combined with numerous action sequences involving fighting and death.

However, it should be noted that the reason why American cinema produces so many films in this category is due to the fact that audiences simply enjoy watching movies such as these. Action movies are often the highest grossing films, both in the U.S. and in international markets. As such, it is likely that Hollywood will continue to make films such as these because it makes them a lot of money.

Overall, I have to say that the movie was brilliant both in the acting and general cinematography that was employed. The dialogue, the scenes and the background music that was utilized mesh perfectly into a seamless theatrical experience. There was never a dull moment in the film and I could not help but be absorbed into the world of the ancient city states. I have to say though that while I thoroughly enjoyed the movie, I could not help but notice the various historical inaccuracies since there was actually a fort instead of just a mountain pass during the Battle of Thermopylae.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2020, March 31). "300" by ‎Zack Snyder Film Analysis. https://ivypanda.com/essays/300-by-zack-snyder-film-analysis/

""300" by ‎Zack Snyder Film Analysis." IvyPanda , 31 Mar. 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/300-by-zack-snyder-film-analysis/.

IvyPanda . (2020) '"300" by ‎Zack Snyder Film Analysis'. 31 March.

IvyPanda . 2020. ""300" by ‎Zack Snyder Film Analysis." March 31, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/300-by-zack-snyder-film-analysis/.

1. IvyPanda . ""300" by ‎Zack Snyder Film Analysis." March 31, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/300-by-zack-snyder-film-analysis/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . ""300" by ‎Zack Snyder Film Analysis." March 31, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/300-by-zack-snyder-film-analysis/.

• Battle of Thermopylae in the “300” Film by Snyder
• Battle of Thermopylae: Course and Results
• "300" the Movie by Zack Snyder
• Film and Multiculturalism: Zack Snyder's "300"
• The Role of Women in Athenian and Spartan Societies
• The Legend of Tutanekai of Sparta
• Mitch Snyder and the CCNV
• 300, Zack Snyder, 2006, a Comparison With the Real Historical Accounts
• Snyder v. Turk Case: Case Briefing
• Case Brief on Snyder v. Phelps
• Film Studies: "One Fine Spring Day"
• "Minority Report" by Steven Spielberg Film Analysis
• "Memento" by Christopher Nolan Film Analysis
• War Horse Film Analysis
• Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas Film Analysis

Notice: All forms on this website are temporarily down for maintenance. You will not be able to complete a form to request information or a resource. We apologize for any inconvenience and will reactivate the forms as soon as possible.

• DVD & Streaming
• Action/Adventure , Drama , Sci-Fi/Fantasy , War

Content Caution

In Theaters

• Gerard Butler as King Leonidas; Lena Headey as Queen Gorgo; Dominic West as Theron; David Wenham as Dilios; Vincent Regan as Captain; Michael Fassbender as Stelios; Tom Wisdom as Astinos; Andrew Pleavin as Daxos; Andrew Tiernan as Ephialtes; Rodrigo Santoro as Xerxes; Stephen McHattie as Loyalist

Home Release Date

• Zack Snyder

Distributor

• Warner Bros.

Movie Review

“Go tell the Spartans, stranger passing by, that here, obedient to their laws, we lie.”

So says a stone epitaph in Thermopylae, Greece, commemorating 300 Spartan warriors who sacrificed their lives in an epic battle against the invading forces of the Persian king Xerxes in 480 B.C. Based on a graphic novel by Frank Miller (Sin City) , 300 mythologizes and immortalizes these soldiers’ absolute commitment to secure their homeland from tyranny.

The story begins amid political discord. On the eve of Xerxes’ invasion, a Spartan oracle has foretold doom if the city’s king, Leonidas, sallies forth into combat during an important religious festival. But the ferocious Leonidas—the epitome of Sparta’s fiercely disciplined martial culture—puts little stock in the gods’ supposed warning. Defying the oracle and the city’s governing council, Leonidas takes leave of his wife, Queen Gorgo (a lioness in her own right), and marches with 300 men from his personal guard to meet the enemy.

Leonidas’ plan to defeat Xerxes’ 100-nation force—which numbers in the hundreds of thousands—requires defending a narrow mountain pass near the sea known as the Hot Gates— Thermopylae in Greek. Joined by 700 volunteer fighters from Thespiae, Leonidas and his professional soldiers prepare to take their stand. Defeat is likely, but they believe their sacrifice will buy time for the city-states of Greece to rally a larger army (a cause Gorgo pursues in her husband’s absence).

The Spartans’ fabled military prowess handily repels the first waves of Xerxes’ army. Neither Xerxes’ elite “Immortal” troops, cavalry, a rhinoceros nor even elephants can dislodge Leonidas and his men from the pass. Enter: treachery and betrayal. History (and this movie) tells the rest.

Positive Elements

Leonidas and Gorgo repeatedly make impassioned speeches about the values Sparta holds dear. These include glory, reason, justice, respect, family and freedom. Bravery is hardly a strong enough word to describe these warriors’ fearlessness. Dying on Sparta’s behalf is the highest possible honor, which yields statements such as Gorgo’s words to her husband as he departs: “Come back with your shield or on it.”

Spartan war tactics depend on interdependence. Leonidas says, “A Spartan’s strength is the warrior next to him.” The king’s willingness to sacrifice himself for his men contrasts with Xerxes’ megalomania; the Persian ruler willingly sends hundreds to their death with no concern for their welfare. The only men Leonidas invites to join his war party are those with sons, lest any family’s line be wiped out.

Leonidas and Gorgo enjoy a strong marriage as equals (in a culture that’s known for generally treating women as second-class citizens). Leonidas also displays affection for his 6-year-old son. And he teaches him, “Fear is constant. Accepting it makes you stronger.”

A soldier known as Captain regrets never telling his son, who’s perished in battle, how he truly felt. “I don’t regret that he died. I regret that I never told him I loved him the most. He stood by me with honor. He [represented] all that was best in me.” A mortally wounded Spartan says to his king, “It is an honor to die by your side.” Leonidas replies, “It’s an honor to have lived at yours.” The only words Leonidas wants delivered to his people are simply, “Remember us.”

Spiritual Elements

Spiritual content in 300 revolves around two axes: the Greek belief in a pantheon of gods and oracles who communicate with them; and Xerxes’ insistence that he is a god to be worshiped.

Leonidas visits an oracle, an entranced young woman who’s “tended to” (more on that below) by horribly disfigured men called Ephors. While there, Leonidas is told, “Trust the gods. Your blasphemies have cost us enough already.” The king dismisses the Ephors as “diseased old mystics.” In passing, Leonidas tells his troops to “pray to the gods.” A storm that sinks many Persian ships is attributed to Zeus’ wrath.

Xerxes is frequently described (by himself and his underlings) in divine terms, such as “god of gods,” and he mimics scriptural language when he says things about himself such as, “The lord of hosts is prepared to forgive all.” He speaks of his divine power and promises (almost like Satan’s temptation of Jesus) to make Leonidas the warlord of all Greece if he submits. His Immortals are described as “Persian ghosts, hunters of men’s souls.”

Sexual Content

The oracle is barely clothed in a gauzy sheet that reveals her breast. It’s implied that the Ephors use her sexually at will, and one licks the oracle’s neck as she delivers her prophecy. A graphic sex scene between Leonidas and his wife includes movement, his uncovered rear and several shots of her breasts. Xerxes invites Ephialtes into his harem and uses promises of sexual pleasure to get him to betray the Spartans. Several women are topless and kiss one another in this sensual, orgy-like scene; others are nearly naked.

Queen Gorgo’s chief opponent on the council is a devious man named Theron; in exchange for his help, she allows him to have his way with her. It’s implied (as he violently grabs her) that he’s virtually raping her. (We briefly glimpse her robe fall to the ground.)

Spartan women, especially the queen, wear cleavage-baring robes without undergarments. The Spartan warriors themselves fight shirtless, and the camera often focuses on their physiques. An offhand reference is made to Athenians being “boy lovers.”

Violent Content

Let’s put it this way: Neither torsos nor appendages fare well in 300 . Perhaps thousands of soldiers find themselves on the receiving end of spears, swords and arrows for about an hour and 15 minutes of this two-hour film. A giant is knifed in the eye. Extremities get hacked off (at least three heads, half-a-dozen arms, legs, hands, etc.). After one decapitation, the father of that soldier cradles his son’s headless body (the head lies nearby). Spartans repeatedly wander the battlefield skewering unfortunates who’ve not quite perished yet. (“No mercy” is a Spartan watchword.) Add to such brutality scenes depicting piles of corpses—some skewered on stakes, others “attached” to a tree with arrows and still others used to construct a defensive wall—and you’ve an epic amount of violent imagery in this film.

Non-battlefield violence includes Leonidas spearing a wolf in the mouth as a youth; 7-year-old Spartans-in-training pummeling and bruising each other; older boys receiving whip lashings to learn how to resist pain; a soldier’s wound being cauterized by white-hot metal; and Queen Gorgo stabbing (and killing) a traitorous Spartan. When a herald of Xerxes arrives in Sparta dangling a chain of skulls for emphasis, Leonidas shoves him and several members of his party into a seemingly bottomless pit. Xerxes’ executioner is a monstrosity of a man whose arms have been replaced with blades (which he dutifully uses to dislodge heads of failed generals).

Crude or Profane Language

In telling a story about a war hundreds of years before the time of Christ, filmmakers weren’t able to logically include abuses of His name. Likewise, they knew it’d be a pretty far stretch to include f-words or s-words. So this R-rated-in-every-other-way movie fades to credits with only one mild profanity (“h—uva) to its name.

Drug and Alcohol Content

Leonidas describes the oracle as “a drunken adolescent girl”—and she definitely looks as if she’s in an artificially induced stupor. During the orgy sequence in Xerxes’ tent, some of the people in the background hold goblets presumably containing wine.

Other Negative Elements

Sparta’s devotion to warcraft has a terrible dark side. When baby boys are born, they’re evaluated for physical defect. Imperfect newborns are discarded into a pit to die. (We see a pile of skulls indicating this happens regularly.) Spartan law also makes retreat from battle illegal. Not surprisingly, revenge and glory are closely connected. When Captain tells Leonidas, “I fill my heart with hate,” the king replies, “Good.”

Ephialtes is a disfigured, hunchbacked man whose father was a Spartan but fled the city because he refused to kill his misshapen son. He raised Ephialtes to be a true Spartan warrior. But the man’s deformities prevent him from functioning as an equal. Embittered, Ephialtes betrays his people.

The queen is greeted with derision by the Spartan ruling council, which normally would refuse to let any woman, even a queen, speak to them. When Theron betrays her before the council, she spits in his face. Both the Ephors and Theron are secretly taking bribes from Xerxes to keep the Spartans out of battle.

I can’t remember the last time I went to a movie so violent and tragic. But that’s only the first half of the sentence. Because afterwards, I watched as scores of moviegoers (mostly men) walked to their cars laughing and pounding each other on the back. You’d have thought we’d all just seen Top Gun for the first time. Such is the influence of the latest big-screen Frank Miller adaptation, a hyper-violent, hyper-masculine ode to honor and duty by way of blood, blood and more blood. Did I mention the blood ?

Stylistically, 300 ‘s melees recall the Wachowski Bros. Matrix trilogy and V for Vendetta . Just as those films raised the visual-effects bar, so 300 could well become a new cinematic benchmark. Combat feels dance-like in its choreography, alternating between real time and slow motion. This results in highly stylized violence—which is all the more emphasized by plumes of blood erupting from combatants’ wounds. Regarding the film’s look, director Zack Snyder commented, “It’s not trying to be reality. The blood is treated like paint, like paint on a canvas. It’s not Saving Private Ryan .” Snyder also admitted he was more interested in creating visually compelling shots than he was recreating historically accurate fight scenes. “It’s bulls—,” he said of some combat elements, “but it looks good.”

Looking good felt to me like Gladiator on steroids—with several graphic sex scenes tossed in to add titillation. Despite its consistent and at times moving emphases on duty and sacrifice, family and freedom, this blood-bathed epic remains so thoroughly saturated with visceral imagery that those virtues risk getting buried in battle.

Given that, I think I can safely say that the enthusiasm of the crowd I witnessed had much less to do with the film’s positive themes than the fact that the filmmakers have managed to make slaughter (and sensuality) look so very cool.

Adam R. Holz

After serving as an associate editor at NavPress’ Discipleship Journal and consulting editor for Current Thoughts and Trends, Adam now oversees the editing and publishing of Plugged In’s reviews as the site’s director. He and his wife, Jennifer, have three children. In their free time, the Holzes enjoy playing games, a variety of musical instruments, swimming and … watching movies.

Latest Reviews

Spy x Family Code: White

Villains Inc.

Rebel Moon – Part Two: The Scargiver

The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare

Weekly reviews straight to your inbox.

Travel, Literature & Culture

I am a big sucker for period movies. 300 didn’t have great reviews, so my expectations were low going in. Well honestly, I really enjoyed the movie. It wasn’t the lesson in Greek history which made it interesting, but the cutting edge use of CGI. Its absolutely stunning and never has a battle scene looked so good.

So what’s it about?

300 is based on the true story of the ‘ Battle of Thermopylae ” in which a group of a few thousand men of Sparta and Greece stood against the Persian attack of demigod Xerxes I.

The movie opens with a snapshot of the life of the average Spartan male – born, bred and trained to be ruthless soldiers. When Persian messengers bring the ultimatum, surrender or perish, the brave King Leonidas I decides to do the latter. For the sake of glory and freedom. He is determined to keep the freedom of his country and protect it from the large armies of Asia, led by Xerxes.

Alas, it is a losing battle as no support comes from the council of Sparta. Leonidas knows his time is limited. A traitor betrays their only weakness and seeing their sure defeat, Leonidas retains only 300 of the spartan soldiers and sends the rest off. These 300 go on to become the symbol of freedom vs tyranny in Greek history forever. These men lived by Spartan law – win or die on the battlefield but never surrender.

Things worth noting

The interesting thing to note is that the movie is quite true to the real account, even down to the use of actual dialogues. The most famous reference is in the scene when the Persian army warns Leonidas to surrender his weapons. He replies, ‘Come and get them’. This line can be found inscribed on his statue in Greece. The details to the costumes, sets and the fighting techniques are informative and interesting.

The casting is good. I am not familiar with any actors but the performances were brilliant. Also, the typical saga of indiscretions and conspiracies in the court of the king add spice to the story. The plot is not inherently complex. Its all fight scenes, special effects and lots and lots of gory bloodshed.

The story of 300 highlights the universal theme of good vs evil, freedom vs slavery, and so on. Emotions are high and there is something to be learned from his lesson in history.

Is 300 a must watch?

I enjoyed watching it but it’s not a MUST watch. There have been better period/war movies.

Save it for later? Pin it!

300 movie review

Vipula is a culture and travel blogger from Los Angeles, California. She completed her MBA and currently works full time in a Fortune 10 company. She is a avid reader and loves traveling around the Globe. You will find her tips and reviews on best travel destinations, books and movie/tv shows on Shades of Words.

R.I.P Michael Jackson

Why you shouldn’t watch harry potter and half blood prince, you may also like, why ‘gone girl’ will leave you on the..., lucifer: devilish detective show, miss fisher’s murder mysteries: a perfect escape into..., marvel studio’s dr. strange – silly & psychedelic, miss pettigrew lives for a day – a..., travel the world with these books, letters from iwo jima: a profound exploration of..., the remains of the day, solving crimes from los angeles to kolkata, 5 fiction titles recommended for women’s history month.

Yes I would watch Gladiator any day over this one. I dont really like sad endings.

LOTR was an amazing series although I dozed off while watching part 1 🙂

I loved 300.. ‘Tonight we shall dine in hell’ .. I loved the way he said it.. and abt LOTR.. same pinch.. I dozed off too.. in part 1… 😀

Girls – I loved LOTR and have seen each movie atleast 3 times – and did not doze off once – just ffwded parts i dint like 🙂

Excellent post but I was wondering if you could write a litte more on this subject? I’d be very thankful if you could elaborate a little bit more. Kudos!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

You must be logged in to post a comment.

• Classic Movies

300 (2006) Movie Review: Dazzling, Brainless Epic

• 300 (movie 2006) review: In his best role to date, Gerard Butler stands out in Zack Snyder’s video-game-like recreation of the lopsided 5th-century B.C.E. war between the Spartan and Persian armies.

300 (movie 2006) review: Starring Gerard Butler, Zack Snyder’s historical war ‘epic’ is a dazzling visual fest akin to an HD video game playing itself

Director Zack Snyder’s 300 may not be the most sophisticated war epic to hit the big screen, but with its series of mesmerizing tableaux and extreme graphic violence the film unquestionably succeeds in dazzling its audience.

In other words: Watching 300 is like watching a video game that plays itself.

State-of-the-art CGI

Set in 480 B.C.E., 300 recounts the fate of King Leonidas (Gerard Butler) of Sparta, as he leads three hundred of his men to battle the superior Persian army of Xerxes the Great (Rodrigo Santoro). The battle is fought at Thermopylae, where Leonidas and his outnumbered soldiers struggle to block the only route through which the enemy could pass.

Setting new standards in the field of computer-generated effects, Zack Snyder (who co-wrote the screenplay with Kurt Johnstad and Michael B. Gordon), cinematographer Larry Fong, editor William Hoy, and the movie’s visual effects team used blue screen technique – through which actors are filmed in front of a blue screen before the addition of CGI-created backgrounds – to assemble glorious, nail-biting battle scenes. As a plus, the omnipresence of sepia mixed with blue and red provides the war epic with the appropriately gloomy mood.

Those who enjoyed Snyder’s 2004 remake of Dawn of the Dead already know that he’s a dab hand at fast-paced filmmaking. But this time, Snyder combines his energetic style with a substantial number of spectacular slow-motion sequences depicting every detail of the battle’s ferocious brutality.

In fact, 300 is packed with decapitations and severed body parts, but considering that the film is based on a graphic novel co-written by Frank Miller (with Lynn Varley) its degree of violence should not surprise anyone.

• Anne Heche Body & Ashton Kutcher Shirtless + Buff Gerard Butler & Jennifer Aniston

How to Train Your Dragon (2010) Movie Review: DreamWorks Succeeds

Stand-out gerard butler.

Apart from the battle sequences, however, 300 has little else to offer.

A subplot – involving Leonidas’ wife, Goro (Lena Headey), fighting against political discrimination – falls flat, while the focus on the Spartans’ refusal to surrender doesn’t spark any significant interest.

On the other hand, Gerard Butler stands out as the King of Sparta – the Scottish actor’s best role yet. Butler fully conveys Leonidas’ fierceness and sacrificial beliefs even though the screenwriters failed to supply him with coherent lines.

‘This is where we look for the game controller!’

In fact, sentences like “Madness? This is Sparta” or “This is where we fight! This is where we die!” made this reviewer look for a game controller so as to skip the dialogue bits.

Although 300 lacks the storytelling flow of Frank Miller and Robert Rodriguez’s adaptation of Miller’s Sin City , Zack Snyder’s epic works just fine as a brainless blockbuster. Indeed, the visuals alone are worth a trip to the theatre.

300 (movie 2006) cast & crew Director: Zack Snyder. Screenplay: Zack Snyder, Kurt Johnstad, and Michael B. Gordon. Cast: Gerard Butler. Lena Headey. Dominic West. David Wenham. Vincent Regan. Michael Fassbender . Tom Wisdom. Rodrigo Santoro. Andrew Pleavin. Andrew Tiernan. Giovani Cimmino. Stephen McHattie.

“ 300 (Movie 2006): Dazzling + Brainless Historical Epic” review text © Franck Tabouring; excerpt, image captions, bullet point introduction, and notes © Alt Film Guide.

“ 300 (Movie 2006): Dazzling + Brainless Historical Epic” notes

Gerard Butler 300 movie image: Warner Bros.

“ 300 (Movie 2006): Dazzling + Brainless Historical Epic” last updated in April 2023.

Recommended for You

Sucker punch box office: zack snyder appeal increasingly shaky, glenn close, michael fassbender: academy’s governors awards, channing tatum magic mike 2 director, golden globes: ‘diversity’ hollywood style, leo and kate reunited, wall street: money never sleeps box office: flop sequel, leave a comment.

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I submit a comment.

300 is without question one of the poorest films I have ever seen. And I’ve seen lots of movies. I sat, mesmerized, waiting in vain for it to improve. Poor narration, terrible dialog and wooden acting. I felt slightly embarrassed to be watching it. One or two ‘scenes’ are visually clever, but I will never waste my time watching this movie again. When compared to the ‘Illusionist’, 300 seems to have been made by teenagers. Very poor movie indeed. Save your money. Don’t say you were not warned.

I didn’t know how to describe 300 to my friends who wanted to see it (I saw an advanced screening).

“Watching 300 is like watching a video game that plays itself.”

I couldn’t have said that better myself.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We don't sell your information to third parties. If you continue browsing, that means you've accepted our Terms of Use/use of cookies. You may also click on the Accept button on the right to make this notice disappear. Accept Privacy Policy

• Become a Critical Movie Critic
• Movie Review Archives

Movie Review: 300 (2007)

• General Disdain
• Movie Reviews
• 5 responses
• --> March 14, 2007

Where do I begin? After all the initial movie reviews and hype surrounding the opening of 300 what else is there to say?

Let me begin, by saying the movie definitely lives up to the fervor surrounding it. You want action? You got it. You want crazy, vivid battle scenes? You got it. You want ripped, hot and sexy actors (for the men-who-like-men and ladies) and actresses (for the ladies-who-like-ladies and men)? You got it. Basically, everything you could want it all rolled up and packaged nicely into a two hour film.

As you know, or will know now, 300 is movie adaptation of a graphic novel by none other than Frank Miller. The novel is loosely based on the real Battle of Thermopylae and inspired by the movie “The 300 Spartans.” It chronicles the futile stand of King Leonidas (Gerard Butler) and 300 Spartan warriors against the hordes of Persia led by Xerxes (Rodrigo Santoro). This stand ultimately wins the war as it provided the time for the Greek city-states to assemble their armies and navies and repel the advancing Persians. But enough about history — lets talk about the movie.

Visually, the movie is shot in a similar fashion as “ Sin City ” (another Frank Miller adaptation). The lighting is muted, scenery is glossy and spectacular and intense detail is spotlighted on areas the director wants your eyes to travel. It is evident 300 has spent countless hours being edited and altered on a Macintosh to ensure the perfect dramatic effect has been placed at exacting moments and proper angles. I can’t see a single scene that doesn’t appear to be CGI shaped in some fashion — even if it didn’t necessarily need it.

Action-wise, this movie is filled to the brim. Aside from ten to twenty minutes worth of backdrop in Sparta involving Queen Gorgo (Lena Headey) and the council, everything else is violence. I’ve seen it said elsewhere (or at least I think I have), but without a doubt, a tightly choreographed dance of death and dismemberment await all those that go to see this. The scenes are extravagant and overloaded. Yet, through it all, the blood and gore is presented in an almost comic fashion. The blood looks like paint droplets and its’ spray and splatter seems to move in unison with the mayhem all about.

The characters, for the most part, are interchangeable. After all, Sparta men are warriors and there is little to discern one from another. It is rather disconcerting to see that everyone within the city are absolutely fantastic to look at. Every man is pumped up with chiseled features. The women are all slim and sleek with wonderfully long legs. If only I was born a Spartan (of course I would have been cast aside as all unworthy children were)! As expected, there isn’t much dialogue, yet the few words spoken by Leonidas are captivating and insightful — hell, he’s trying to keep 300 men motivated and ready to battle 100,000 foes. He’d better have something good to say!

For the faint of heart and those who cannot escape reality, 300 is not the movie for you. Every scene is over-the-top and exaggerated and its done purely for visual effect. The speeches about Sparta are beyond blusterous. And, I’m no history major, but I’m guessing there is very little in the way of historical fact here. But it all works. It all works very good. Kudos to Zack Snyder, the director, for presenting us with a well painted portrait.

Tagged: graphic novel adaptation , Greece , king

I'm an old, miserable fart set in his ways. Some of the things that bring a smile to my face are (in no particular order): Teenage back acne, the rain on my face, long walks on the beach and redneck women named Francis. Oh yeah, I like to watch and criticize movies.

Movie Review: Ghosted (2023) Movie Review: Bill & Ted Face the Music (2020) Movie Review: Fantasy Island (2020) Movie Review: Snatched (2017) Movie Review: Horrible Bosses 2 (2014) Movie Review: ABCs of Death 2 (2014) Movie Review: Life After Beth (2014)

'Movie Review: 300 (2007)' have 5 comments

March 16, 2007 @ 1:56 pm Ray

I found the movie to be boisterous and full of itself. This was just an exercise in glorifying gore and decapitations.

Log in to Reply

March 17, 2007 @ 10:06 am General Disdain

I agree on both points. Doesn’t mean the movie wasn’t a successful endeavor though, now does it?

March 18, 2007 @ 7:28 pm Corpus Cannabis

Zack Snyder’s 300 begins with thunder, blood-red lettering followed by the overblown 300 slices, dices and decimates into music video styled computer generated monster mash with no sign of intelligent life sign. This adaptation of Frank Miller’s graphic novel is no where close to what Sin City was.

One can discern what is happening on the screen, though it doesn’t make much sense except as some grand visual dramatisation of kill fantasy. Everything is phony in this movie, memorable sights abound, arrows soaring in the sky, Persians plummeting off a cliff and some fantastic visual display of dead villagers festooned to a tree.

It’s sad after all the hype, 300 is humor-less and so utterly over the top with no flavor any realism. I give 300 4 piles of dog poop.

November 26, 2007 @ 8:11 am Atomic Popcorn

I loved this movie, well done adaptation.

March 24, 2010 @ 10:03 pm guchi

If you can’t enjoy a movie like this you’re quite possibly full of yourself or belong in a PG rated theatre.

Privacy Policy | About Us

 |  Log in

The Definitive Voice of Entertainment News

Subscribe for full access to The Hollywood Reporter

site categories

The Frank Miller experience continues with the mythology of the ancient Battle of Thermopylae in 480 B.C. where, according to legend and his graphic novel, 300 Spartan warriors went up against the barbarous hordes of the Persian god-king Xerxes.

By Kirk Honeycutt , The Associated Press February 14, 2007 8:00pm

• Share this article on Facebook
• Share this article on Twitter
• Share this article on Flipboard
• Share this article on Email
• Show additional share options
• Share this article on Linkedin
• Share this article on Pinit
• Share this article on Reddit
• Share this article on Tumblr
• Share this article on Whatsapp
• Share this article on Print
• Share this article on Comment

This review was written for the festival screening of “300.”

BERLIN — The Frank Miller experience continues in “300.” This is the second movie to transfer a muscular story and visuals from a Miller graphic novel to the screen. Instead of the neo-noir, pulp-fiction theater of cruelty in the Robert Rodriguez’s 2005 film “Sin City,” “300” dives into the mythology of the ancient Battle of Thermopylae in 480 B.C. Here, according to the graphic novel by Miller and Lynn Varley, 300 Spartan warriors went up against the barbarous hordes of the Persian god-king Xerxes and died valiantly defending Greek notions of freedom and justice.

Related Stories

K-pop powerhouse ateez on making history at coachella, record store day and the grammy museum, céline dion says she hopes to "find a miracle" while fighting stiff person syndrome.

Those turned off by the sex-and-violence cartoonery of “Sin City” can embrace “300,” which screened Out of Competition here. In epic battle scenes where he combines breathtaking and fluid choreography, gorgeous 3-D drawings and hundreds of visual effects, director Zack Snyder puts onscreen the seemingly impossible heroism and gore of which Homer sang in “The Iliad.” A raging hero mowing down multitudes with sword, shield and spear suddenly seems plausible.

The designed look of this alternative world, the abstraction and beauty of its topography, colors and forms, open up the human action to larger-than-life deeds and grand gestures that in a more realistic context would be pure camp. The film, which opens domestically March 9, will attract a sizable worldwide audience, skewering heavily male, of course.

Greece in the 5th century B.C. is a land truly favored by the gods, bathed in rich, harmonious dark chocolate, beige and gray colors. A prologue swiftly establishes the austere warrior city-state of Sparta, whose men are trained from birth to fight, to never retreat and never surrender.

The film’s hero, King Leonidas (Gerard Butler), has lived his entire life to fight this battle against the Persians. Its sole survivor, Dilios (David Wenham), is the one who narrates the tale. Messengers from the Persian army arrive in Sparta, arrogantly offering either capitulation or annihilation. Leonidas kills the messengers.

But political opportunism rules the Spartan Council, which insists that Leonidas consult the Oracle. This consists of beautiful young and drugged women controlled by sickly, corrupt priests. The Oracle refuses to release the Spartan army to its ruler as no battle can occur during an upcoming religious celebration.

So Leonidas has little choice but to “take a stroll” to the north with 300 of his best warriors as “bodyguards.” He chooses to engage the Persians in the Thermopylae pass, a narrow corridor between the steep cliffs of the Aegean Sea. Here the vast numbers of the enemy count for little since only a few can go up against Sparta’s best at any one time.

The stage is thus set for a cinematic meal: A succession of charges by Persian forces — slave warriors, physical oddities, African animals, magic wizards and an elite guard called the Immortals in black Darth Vader masks — is slaughtered by the 300. Snyder instinctively knows when to shift to slow motion or quick stop-action to catch the brilliant athleticism of his fighting choreography. This is thrilling stuff.

Then comes Xerxes (Rodrigo Santoro) himself, a bejeweled, depraved giant carried on a high tower by his slaves. The god-king tries unsuccessfully to seduce Leonidas in a homoerotic passage as the ancient world stands still.

But it is a deformed and pathetic creature, Ephialtes (Andrew Tiernan), an outcast Spartan, who betrays the 300 by showing Xerxes a hidden path leading behind Spartan lines. The 300 are doomed yet die “beautiful deaths.”

Adapting Miller’s take on Spartan battle wear, Snyder and costume designer Michael Wilkinson strip the warriors down to essentials: a helmet, shield, red capes, loin cloths and scandals in warm colors. All the rest is manly flesh. The Persians, by contrast, are dressed in all sorts of jewels, peacock color, gold, purple, black — a hooker’s ball of exotic, foreign and decadent costumes.

Snyder and his writers Kurt Johnstad and Michael B. Gordon open up a second front of villainy back home as wily politician Theron (Dominic West) manipulates the council against sending reinforcements and crudely takes Queen Gorgo (Lena Headey) sexually. This is weak and unconvincing, but it does get the writers around the historical fact that the expedition against the Persians, fully supported by the city-state, probably numbered around 7,000 rather than 300.

Butler is a paragon of manhood as the fine warrior-king, but in a Frank Miller world there is no time for introspection and doubt, making him a two-dimensional creature in this 3-D world.

Headey, looking alarmingly skinny, seems more like a fashion model than reigning queen. Vincent Regan as the Captain is a man with a ferocious appetite for killing. All other roles are somewhat perfunctory as Spartan ideals overrule much of an inner life.

Obviously, the true stars here are the armies of technicians, designers, fight choreographers and cinematographer Larry Fong, who collaborate on this stylized vision of the ancient world. Then add Tyler Bates’ robust, haunting and soulful music.

What isn’t clear after two Frank Miller graphic novel movies is where this technique is leading. So far it has served only exaggerated blood, guts and sex. “300” suggests that it might create worlds of myth and fantasy not necessarily ruled by mayhem. If not, though, it’s going to get old, even ancient, very fast.

300 Warner Bros. Pictures Warner Bros. Pictures in association with Legendary Pictures and Virtual Studios present a Mark Canton/Gianni Nunnari production Credits: Director: Zack Snyder Screenwriters: Kurt Johnstad, Michael B. Gordon Based on the graphic novel by: Frank Miller, Lynn Varley Producers: Gianni Nunnari, Mark Canton, Bernie Goldmann, Jeffrey Silver Executive producers: Frank Miller, Deborah Snyder, Craig J. Flores, Thomas Tull, William Fay, Scott Mednick, Ben Waisbren Director of photography: Larry Fong Production designer: James Bissell Visual effects supervisor: Chris Watts Music: Tyler Bates Costume designer: Michael Wilkinson Editor: William Hoy Cast: King Leonidas: Gerald Butler Queen Gorgo: Lena Headey Dilios: David Wenham Theron: Dominic West Captain: Vincent Regan Stelios: Michael Fassbinder Astinos: Tom Wisdom Xerxes: Rodrigo Santoro Ephialtes: Andrew Tiernan Running time — 117 minutes MPAA rating: R 

THR Newsletters

Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day

More from The Hollywood Reporter

Karlovy vary festival piles on angsty adaptations with franz kafka retrospective, jerry seinfeld says “disorientation replaced the movie business” and talks directorial film debut, anne hathaway recalls being asked to “make out” with 10 different men for chemistry test, eiza gonzalez talks ‘ministry of ungentlemanly warfare,’ ‘3 body problem’ season 2 and her real-life ‘ambulance’ sequel, david mamet calls hollywood’s diversity efforts “fascist totalitarianism”, ‘severance’ actor tramell tillman joins next ‘mission: impossible’ (exclusive).

Josho Brouwers 21 March 2014

Good quotes

To Athens and Sparta he did not send heralds to demand earth for the following reasons. On a former occasion, when Darius sent for the same purpose, the former having thrown those who made the demand into the barathrum [a deep pit in Athens in which certain criminals were thrown], and the latter into a well, bade them carry earth and water to the king from those places.

Elements of Spartan culture

The overall plot, omissions and unnecessary additions, errors and anachronisms, the monstrous persian army, an army of slaves, portrayal of king xerxes, closing remarks.

• International edition
• Australia edition
• Europe edition

T he political and media classes of Iran are reportedly up in arms about this fantastically silly retelling of the Battle of Thermopylae in 480BC, co-produced by Frank Miller, author of the pulpy shocker Sin City, and also the graphic novel on which this movie is based. With the kind of tremulous fervour that only prepubescent boys can work up on the subject of war, it recounts how the barbarous invading hordes of Persia were heroically held back by just 300 oiled and muscly Spartan warriors long enough for the Greek armies to regroup and for Athenian democracy - and by implication, all our inherited western values - to be saved for ever more. Iranian commentators, sudden and quick in quarrel, have found the slight intolerable. These people will presumably now redouble their commitment to historical sensitivity with another Holocaust Denial Conference.

And anyway, please. The Persians aren't made to look that bad. If they were, they'd be played by Brits. As it is, their leader, King Xerxes, is semi-nude (like everyone else) with loads of ethnic-looking body jewellery and he is played by pert Brazilian actor Rodrigo Santoro, last seen almost getting off with Laura Linney in Love, Actually and almost getting off with Nicole Kidman in Baz Luhrmann's multimillion dollar Chanel ad.

It's the Spartan King, Leonidas, who is played by a Brit: the grizzled, masculine, shouty figure of Gerard Butler, like a poor man's Russell Crowe. He's even shown in a rippling cornfield with his lady wife, like the great Gladiator of old. Like the other 299 warriors, he models an unattractive pair of trunks, looking like no one so much as the legendary 1970s English wrestler Mick McManus, although Mick never had those twin slabs of pecs and the kind of ripped abs that come from 1,000 crunches a day - or at any rate a fair bit of digital tweaking in post-production.

The biggest laugh comes when Leonidas, while striding purposefully around in his dun-coloured pants, gruffly denounces the culture of Athens as "poets and boy-lovers!" Oh Leonidas! Do you really want to go there, your Majesty? Do you really want to poke the lid of that worm-filled can with your great big Spartan spear? I had a feeling that, whatever the historical reality of the Spartans' sexual conventions, the Spartan armourer here should have been working overtime running up the 300 handbags necessary for the kind of martial contest for which this vast platoon of gym-bunnies is most obviously fitted. The Spartans were historically joined by Thespians, and frankly they are all Thespians in spirit. I don't think I have ever seen a more unintimidating bunch. Were they up against Ron Weasley, Hermione Granger and Hyacinth Bucket we would see 300 arses - that is to say 600 tastefully smudged, semi-revealed Spartan buttocks - getting well and truly kicked. The silliest-sounding one is the Australian actor David Wenham, who has a strangulated English accent, as if he is auditioning to be a commentator on Test Match Special.

Xerxes commands a vast force and moreover has at his disposal a number of gigantic beasts, real and legendary, along with weird claw-handed giants whose job is to decapitate underperforming generals pour encourager les autres. He arrogantly sends word to Sparta, demanding of Leonidas some token form of submission: a tribute of earth and water. Leonidas refuses, kicks the Persians' emissary into a well, and slaughters the rest of the messenger's entourage too, apparently reckoning that, in the richness and fullness of time, their non-reappearance back in the Persian camp will tell Xerxes all he needs to know. Yet a corrupt cadre of Spartan priests, given to slobbering loathsomely over beautiful dancing girls, tries to tell Leonidas that the time is not propitious for Sparta to go to war. These hideous misshapen old men - and I have never seen a film go in quite so enthusiastically for the ugly-equals-wicked equation - are in the pocket of Sparta's most duplicitous and corrupt politician Theron, played by Dominic West.

Theron's most abysmal act of wickedness, while the King is away, is to force himself upon Leonidas's queen, played in full spirited-filly mode by Lena Headey . "This will not be over quickly," he hisses malevolently into her ear. "You will not enjoy this." I checked my watch at this stage, and found that on this issue, Theron had a point.

And yet it has to be said that there is a level of cheerfully self-aware ridiculousness, which means that 300 is not entirely without entertainment value. Pundits might be pretty quick to invoke Leni Riefenstahl in connection with this movie, and certainly Nazi Germany did indeed have a belligerent-sentimental soft spot for the Spartans at Thermopylae. But no one could possibly take it seriously, and surely no one in their right mind in the US could find in Frank Miller's homoerotic battle fantasy of Thermopylae an incitement to war against Iran. Apart from anything else, the idea of America having the Spartans' underdog status is not plausible.

• Action and adventure films
• Science fiction and fantasy films
• Period and historical films
• Lena Headey

Most viewed

Home — Essay Samples — Entertainment — Movie Review — A Personal Review of the Historical Movie 300

A Personal Review of The Historical Movie 300

• Categories: 300 Movie Movie Review

About this sample

Words: 766 |

Published: Jun 5, 2019

Words: 766 | Pages: 2 | 4 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Verified writer

• Expert in: Entertainment

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

3 pages / 1283 words

5 pages / 2284 words

4 pages / 1842 words

7.5 pages / 3441 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Movie Review

In this "The Notebook" movie review we delve into the poignant narrative of Duke, an elderly man who recounts a captivating story from his notebook to a fellow patient suffering from dementia in a nursing home. The story begins [...]

The movie Little Miss Sunshine provides an amusing and honest portrayal of a typical American family. This Caucasian, middle-class family embarks on a disaster filled road trip, to take seven-year-old Olive from their home town [...]

Watching a good movie is one of my favorite pastimes. After a long day of school or work there is on other sensations such as curling up on the couch and watching a great movie. Epic stories throughout our history our best [...]

In this film The Lorax advocates for nature and everything that lives inside of it. As you watch the Film you can see the spiritual and emotional connection the Lorax has to the land. The Lorax and the environment around him was [...]

Sylvester Stallone’s “Rocky” is universally regarded as a classic film. Winning multiple Oscars, launching the acting career of Stallone himself (perhaps not the best consequence in the long run…), and inspiring several people [...]

The movie, Whale Rider, takes place in New Zealand, somewhere of in the mountains in the 2000’s. Our main character’s story starts off in a hospital setting and a mother is giving birth to a freshly born, baby girl, named Paikea [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

3. movie review in 300-words

September 7, 2011 at 6:17 pm · Filed under Uncategorized

3. movie review in 300-words

Flipping through the local Comcast HBO channels, the movie “The Perfect Getaway,” struck my attention. After reading the short description of the movie provided, I was instantly interested in this thrilling horror adventure of two murderous newlyweds.

The movie involves three main couples who all seemingly are enjoying themselves in the vast tropical islands of Hawaii. This quickly ends when word spread about two young people on the run after killing a few locals. One couple, the newlyweds, appears to be the most innocent and continuously show the audience that they are the victims, rather than the villains. This aspect of the movie grabs the audience because the criminals are never revealed until the few remaining minutes of the film.

The newlyweds framed one of the couples by informing the police that they were indeed the killers. They placed bloody teeth in the bags of this couple to ensure the evidence. The newlyweds and the other couple than continue their vacation. The young unmarried couple of course thinking that the murderers are finally gone. Just when the new groom had his chance he attempts to kill the other man, leaving his girlfriend in complete fear as she is left hopeless fighting for survival.

The appearance of the newlyweds is a very good cover up of their true identity. The husband acts to be a geek as the wife is very shy and awkward.  The format of this movie was much different than many that I have seen. I predicted so many things to happen and the majority all wrong, which I think is why this is a very good movie. The plot was carefully constructed, and all the puzzle pieces form together by the end. Overall I think this is a very thrilling film (that is for a free HBO movie), well recommended.

Share this:

No comments yet », leave a comment cancel reply.

• September 2011
• Uncategorized

Just another WordPress.com site

• Get Inspired
• Get Polling
• Get Support
• Learn WordPress.com
• Theme Showcase
• WordPress Planet
• WordPress.com News
• Entries RSS
• Comments RSS

Get a free blog at WordPress.com The Fjords04 Theme

• Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
• Subscribe Subscribed
• Copy shortlink
• Report this content
• View post in Reader
• Manage subscriptions
• Collapse this bar

• User Reviews

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews

• User Ratings
• External Reviews
• Metacritic Reviews
• Full Cast and Crew
• Release Dates
• Official Sites
• Company Credits
• Filming & Production
• Technical Specs
• Plot Summary
• Plot Keywords
• Parents Guide

Did You Know?

• Crazy Credits
• Alternate Versions
• Connections
• Soundtracks

Photo & Video

• Photo Gallery
• Trailers and Videos

Related Items

• External Sites

Related lists from IMDb users

Recently Viewed

Newsmoor.com is an educational website for online learning. It Provides information: on verbal and nonverbal communication elements, noise, models, and theories, print, broadcast, and online journalism, and feature article writing. It also includes business models, theories, plans, profile examples, advantages and disadvantages of several models, facts, research methodology, research proposal writing, assignment writing, a study abroad, including top public and private universities and educational consultants.

Film Review Writing of 3 Idiots For Students Examples

Film Review Writing of 3 Idiots For Students Example PDF. 3 Idiots Movie Review Essay PDF.  Movie Review Writing Class 11, 12 3 Idiots.

Film Review

A film review refers to a feature article analyzing the quality of the film strategically. It is a process of providing an opinion based on the strengths and weaknesses of the film. The film review is the most common type of feature writing , followed by the travelogue, how-to, and personal feature story.

The film review statement is formed based on the film’s plot, dialogue, acting, theme, location, sound, music, and more. Hence, a film review is a process of analyzing a film thoroughly and critically. The 3 Idiots is the most famous Indian film for writing a film review feature story .

Film Review of 3 Idiots For Students

Description of the 3 idiots film.

The 3 Idiots is a 2009 Indian comedy-drama film directed by Rajkumar Hirani. It has managed to secure a position in the top Bollywood movie list. It is one of the best motivational blockbuster films in the history of Bollywood. The 3 Idiots film has become the highest-grossing opening-day collection film. It has also become the highest opening weekend collection film in India’s history of Bollywood films. It is one of the first Indian films that earn Rs 200 Crores net at the box office. Finally, it earned Rs 395 crores globally.

The most famous Indian actor Aamir Khan played the leading role in the film 3 Idiots. Apart from Aamir Khan, R. Madhavan, Sharman Joshi, Kareena Kapoor, Boman Irani, and Omi Vaidya acted in the lead roles. They are also very familiar faces in the Bollywood world. The 3 Idiots film is directed by Rajkumar Hirani and Produced by Vidhu Vinod Chopra. The film director offered Actor Shah Rukh Khan the character of Rancho. He declined the offer citing date issues, and the role went to Aamir Khan .

The three essential roles of the 3 Idiots film are Aamir Khan as Rancchoddas “Rancho” Shyamaldas Chanchad or Phunsukh Wangdu, R. Madhavan as Farhan Qureshi, Sharman Joshi as Raju Rastogi. They studied engineering at the Imperial College of Engineering and shared a room in a hostel. Apart from them, the additional stars are Kareena Kapoor as Pia, Omi Vaidya as Chatur Ramalingam (Silencer), Boman Irani as Viru Sahastrebuddhe (Virus), Parikshit Sahni as Mr. Qureshi,  and Mona Singh as Mona Sahastrebuddhe (pia’s sister).

The Imperial College of Engineering is one of India’s best colleges for engineering studies. Rancho got admission as a rich man’s son in India, while Farhan and Raju are from an average family. Farhan dreamed of being a wildlife photographer, but his father insisted he study engineering because it had his wish. Indeed, Rancho was the son of a gardener.

Raju has come to study to uplift his family’s fortunes because he is from an impoverished family. Rancho’s passion is earning knowledge rather than the conventional obsession of the other students with exam ranks. With his different approach, Rancho suffers the wrath of the dean of the college, Professor Viru Sahastrabudhhe (ViruS) (Boman Irani). Rancho terms the dean as ViruS.

He irritates his lecturers by giving creative and unique answers. Joy was also a student of the Imperial College of Engineering. She had requested the dean to extend his major project on the compassionate grounds that his father had suffered a stroke. But, Virus refused, saying he was utterly unmoved by his son’s accidental death after being hit by a train. Rancho condemns the learning system of the institution, blaming it for Lobo’s death.

Threatened by Rancho’s talent and free spirit, ViruS labels him an “idiot,” and he attempts to destroy his friendship with Raju and Farhan. In contrast, (Omi Vaidya) Chatur Ramalingam, or “Silencer,” is the model student in the eyes of ViruS, who always wants to get high marks through memorizing rather than understanding.

Finally, Rancho comes first, and he was awarded ViruS’s pen that he had been keeping for a few decades to gift to the most brilliant student.

3 Idiots Film Review- Opinions

The 3 Idiots Bollywood film is a great film to motivate students. It has come up with an excellent message for university students. Three Idiots film teaches us to be more creative rather than only memorizing books. Every student should watch this film to understand better how to study well at University without remembering books.

The 3 Idiots film will help differentiate between the students who like to memorize only without understanding and those who want to understand topics rather than memorize. The audience will get a clear concept of the duties and responsibilities of a successful student. I immensely enjoyed this film for its fantastic story, casting, dialogue, and music.

Strengths of the 3 Idiots Film

This film teaches us that we should focus on what we like to do and stop doing what people suggest doing us, just like Farhan. From a personal or professional perspective, calm and motivate yourself when you face difficulties or critical situations. It results in positive things in our lives. We should not be just confined to bookish Knowledge. Only getting higher ranks won’t help you succeed, but you will surely succeed if you get excellent at your work.

Don’t run behind the success; achieve excellence first; the success will automatically come looking for you. Be always creative in your answers, work, & things, which helps you become more capable of your own life.

Believing in our own is very much important. If you want to achieve something, you must think you can fully achieve it. It will surely get easier to achieve your goal. If you’re going to succeed, you can’t just race with others; instead, you will have to think more advanced than them, more significantly, and more efficiently.

Based on the 348,000 responses in IMBD,  the 3 Idiots film obtained a rating of 8.4/10.

Weaknesses of the 3 Idiots Film

This film has many pranking scenes, such as pranking teachers and mocking professors. Moreover, the prank with Chatur was too terrible; it could tear up any student’s self-confidence and push them towards depression. There are a few scenes where students drink alcohol, which badly impacts students’ psychology and questions the engineering college system. Students are died of suicide instead of solving problems.

Additionally, in this film, the audience can see the delivery of a baby with a suction pipe, giving exams after times up, and just fleeing quickly by mixing their papers with other papers.

We think the filmmakers haven’t done enough research on baby delivery. Otherwise, they would have known that the placenta was also delivered after the baby’s delivery. Doctors can find such mistakes in the film.

The leading role in this film is Aamir Khan, who did not struggle enough to achieve success. But it is a fact that struggle and handwork are inevitable for success.

Additionally, the writer Chetan Bhagat claimed that the story of the 3 Idiots film has taken from his novel “Five Point Someone.” This controversy came up just after released the movie. However, Rajkumar Hirani explained that he had taken permission from Chetan Bhagat while writing the script.

3 Idiots Film Evaluation with Evidence

Based on the evidence, it is safe to say that this is one of the most successful films in Bollywood history. The 3 Idiots film earned around US$90 million, making it the highest-grossing Bollywood film. Additionally, the film has won six Filmfare Awards, including Best Film, and three National Film Awards. It has won overseas awards, such as Japan’s Videoyasan Awards Grand Prize. Further, the 3 Idiots film has been nominated for Best Outstanding Foreign Language Film at the Japan Academy Awards and Best Foreign Film at China’s Beijing International Film Festival. The 3 Idiot film was a hit in China, and they were even interested in remaking it.

 Lessons from the 3 Idiots Film

Raju: I have learned to stand up on my feet after breaking my legs.

Rancho: Follow your passion. Don’t study something you know you are not interested in or are bad at.

Rancho: Learning is not memorizing the exact words from the textbook. Learning means understanding the topic and describing it in your own words with your ideas.

Recommendations to Watch 3 Idiots Film

I want to recommend people to watch this motivational film. Firstly, It is a family-friendly film. So, all family members, from the eldest to the youngest, can sit together to watch this film. There is no intimate sexual scene except a kissing scene. In addition, this film story is appropriate to student life so that students will enjoy it very much. Students can get motivation from this film to study well. Finally, it is a motivational film and gives positive thoughts to acquire success in life.

The 3 Idiots Film Review PDF Download Link- Download PDF

Author: M M Kobiruzzaman

M M Kobiruzzaman is a researcher, lecturer, and academic & creative content writer. He studied for a Master of Management By Research at the School of Business and Economics Faculty, Universiti Putra Malaysia. Previously, he graduated from the Department of Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia. His research interests contained Journalism, Social Media Communication, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), and Corporate Communication. He has published several journal articles globally. He prefers to impart academic knowledge to other people through content writing.  View all posts by M M Kobiruzzaman

5 thoughts on “Film Review Writing of 3 Idiots For Students Examples”

Thank you very much for good film review

It is very thankful

Thanks for amazing film review

Thanks for best film review

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .